The notion that face masks have zero cost to the wearer or other persons has been, as suspected, false. While the ramifications have been underrated their effectiveness has been overrated.
“Psychologically, wearing facemask fundamentally has negative effects on the wearer and the nearby person. Basic human-to-human connectivity through face expression is compromised and self-identity is somewhat eliminated [47], [48], [49].
These dehumanizing movements partially delete the uniqueness and individuality of person who wearing the facemask as well as the connected person [49]. Social connections and relationships are basic human needs, which innately inherited in all people,
whereas reduced human-to-human connections are associated with poor mental and physical health [50], [51].
Despite escalation in technology and globalization that would presumably foster social connections, scientific findings show that people are becoming increasingly more socially isolated, and the prevalence of loneliness is increasing in last few decades [50], [52].
Poor social connections are closely related to isolation and loneliness, considered significant health related risk factors [50], [51], [52], [53].
A meta-analysis of 91 studies of about 400,000 people showed a 13% increased morality risk among people with low compare to high contact frequency [53]. Another meta-analysis of 148 prospective studies (308,849 participants) found that
poor social relationships was associated with 50% increased mortality risk. People who were socially isolated or fell lonely had 45% and 40% increased mortality risk, respectively.
These findings were consistent across ages, sex, initial health status, cause of death and follow-up periods [52]. Importantly, the increased risk for mortality was found comparable to smoking and exceeding well-established risk factors such as obesity and physical inactivity[52]
An umbrella review of 40 systematic reviews including 10 meta-analyses demonstrated that compromised social relationships were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, depression, anxiety suicide, cancer and overall physical illness [51]
As described earlier, wearing facemasks causing hypoxic and hypercapnic state that constantly challenges the normal homeostasis, and activates “fight or flight” stress response, an important survival mechanism in the human body [11], [12], [13].
The acute stress response includes activation of nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and the immune systems [47], [54], [55], [56]. These include activation of the limbic part of the brain, release stress hormones (adrenalin, neuro-adrenalin and cortisol),
changes in blood flow distribution (vasodilation of peripheral blood vessels and vasoconstriction of visceral blood vessels) and activation of the immune system response (secretion of macrophages and natural killer cells) [47], [48].
Encountering people who wearing facemasks activates innate stress-fear emotion, which is fundamental to all humans in danger or life threating situations, such as death or unknown, unpredictable outcome.
While acute stress response (seconds to minutes) is adaptive reaction to challenges and part of the survival mechanism, chronic and prolonged state of stress-fear is maladaptive and has detrimental effects on physical and mental health.
The repeatedly or continuously activated stress-fear response causes the body to operate on survival mode, having sustain increase in blood pressure, pro-inflammatory state and immunosuppression [47], [48].”
🧵THREAD: What Really Happened in World War I The Great War
Not the story you were taught. A tale of broken empires, ritual inversion, and the memory war that never ended.
🕯️ On this day, August 3rd, Germany declared war on France. But the real story started long before…and it’s still unfolding.
1. The End of a Sacred Order
World War I was not just a geopolitical accident.
It was a ritual dismemberment of the old world monarchies, lineages, and sacred patterns of time and memory.
Czar Nicholas. Emperor Franz Joseph. Kaiser Wilhelm.
All related. All gone by war’s end.
This was not chance.
2. A War Against the West
What collapsed in 1914 wasn’t just empires.
It was faith itself—the covenant between the individual, the sacred, and the real.
It wasn’t only Christendom that fell,
but the very promise of religion:
That life had meaning.
That suffering had dignity.
That the soul stood before God - not the State.
THREAD 🧵 | Why some media outlets may shut down instead of reporting the truth: The hidden history behind the Smith-Mundt Act, intelligence-media networks, and the rise of the information-industrial complex (2012 to 2025) - a study.
1. They call it the Great Narrative. We call it what it is: weaponized consensus built by midwit technocrats, intel cutouts, and corporate priests.
You’re not watching collapse.
You’re watching controlled reconstruction through chaos.
Let’s name it all.
Let’s ✨Zachor what we learned from Covid.
2. It started in 2012. Quietly.
Congress passed the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, buried in the NDAA. It repealed a Cold War rule that banned the U.S. government from deploying propaganda against its own citizens.
The firewall came down. The machine turned inward.
1. In Oct 1944, Stalin and Hitler helped a fringe paramilitary party — the Arrow Cross — seize power in Hungary in 1944 - A Catholic priest, András Kun, used religion to justify mass executions.
2. The Arrow Cross Party began in the 1930s as a minor extremist movement in Hungary.
They called themselves “Green Shirts”, copying the uniform tactics of militant groups in Europe.
The color “green” was meant to signal renewal, nationalism, and peasant identity as a branding move to appeal to “the people.”
Something changed in us after the lockdowns. Not just mentally. Not just emotionally. Deeply. Spiritually. Here’s what I’m seeing—and why we may be living through the long echo of mass psychological programming. 🧵
1/ After the mandates, lockdowns, and messaging loops, I’ve been watching people. And what worries me most isn’t fear.
It’s this:
People no longer seem moved to act just because something is good.
Only if it is “effective,” “impactful,” or “productive.” This inverts Hope.
2/ Rather than Hope being relational and personal it’s mechanized, institutionalized, made into something determined by a system. Vaclav Havel said this about Hope.
What the Talmud really says—and why misunderstanding satire leads to dangerous distortion.
Let’s talk about Peter Schäfer, “Yeshu,” and why misreading rabbinic humor is like thinking A Modest Proposal advocated cannibalism. 🧵
1/ @RealCandaceO here cites Princeton scholar Peter Schäfer to claim the Talmud says disgraceful things about Jesus.
That’s not just incorrect—it’s a misreading of satire, of literary context, and of Jewish interpretive tradition. Remember what Robin Williams said about killing all the funny people?
@RealCandaceO 2/
In Jesus in the Talmud, Schäfer analyzes stories about “Yeshu” (a figure some associate with Jesus) in rabbinic texts written centuries after his death.
These stories are not creeds…they’re literary, often satirical, and encoded for a reason.