The GOP says it's mad at corporations even as it protects shareholders from taxes. But that's the thing: Firms aren't their shareholders. The GOP's "woke capital" beef isn't with capital, it's with *managers* & the workers and customers who influence them. businessinsider.com/woke-capital-i…
As such, the Republican beefs about what corporations are up to are exclusively about things with no particular link to profits or shareholder value. They want to rein in executives, so long as it doesn't actually hurt owners. businessinsider.com/woke-capital-i…
For example, if you got firms to generally stop voicing support for progressive causes, that probably wouldn't affect aggregate profits. The stakeholders seeking those corporate statements are workers or customers, not shareholders. businessinsider.com/woke-capital-i…
"Woke" corporate acts might raise profits (probably not across a whole industry, so shareholders don't lose if the whole industry is dissuaded.) But people run firms. C-suites and PR shops are not immune to the suburban anti-Trump revolt. And workers and customers influence them.
So actually in a way, the GOP whining about "woke capital" isn't flailing from a party that once aligned with big business. It's an expression of the view that corporations should exist to serve shareholders and other stakeholders should pipe down. businessinsider.com/woke-capital-i…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump literally said in an interview on Monday that people should get the vaccine. I'd like him to say it more but we should emphasize that his vaccine advocacy is current and still applicable.
Trump is also out there saying the J&J pause is unwarranted and Biden should stop withholding it from people. This is also a useful message for reducing vaccine hesitancy.
This is the thing though: A lot of liberals talking about Trump and the vaccine are way more interested in talking about how bad Trump is and how dumb conservatives are than in convincing conservatives to get vaccinated.
This is just such horseshit. Conservatives who are vaguely mad about black activism but can't actually argue for Derek Chauvin's innocence have fallen back to this theoretical argument that the jury was under undue pressure. mediaite.com/tv/tucker-carl…
It's likely that people were worried about unrest if there was an acquittal. (We can see this in practice, like with LA closing vaccines sites for the day, which it should not have done.) But where is any evidence that this mattered at the margin, for the verdict?
You could theoretically have a condition where cops were unjustly convicted because people feared riots. But can people point to specific cases where that has happened? Whereas we can point to many cases where police and governments have been unaccountable.
The handful of European destinations opening to vaccinated Americans are getting nonstop flights from the US: Boston-Reykjavik, JFK-Athens, Newark-Dubrovnik, etc. businessinsider.com/united-delta-o…
It seems on at least some dates Delta will be flying twice daily to Athens from JFK
I remember reading this piece seven years ago and it's amazing how mainstream the subcultural dysfunction described here has gone in the following seven years. thenation.com/article/archiv…
Particularly this sort of stuff, where anyone who can say their identity is marginalized can declare something "harmful" and that's supposed to be the end of the discussion, no matter how ridiculous they're being.
... and the power associated with ability this has caused bizarre efforts to classify new categories of marginalization, such as "college student" (in the Alex Morse fiasco) or "reporter."
There was a trend a couple years ago with men wearing crop tops, if we survived that we’ll survive some people wearing masks long after they’re useful.
Although, I dunno, it might be kind of fun if we had a new social norm where you could scold people in public for wearing something tacky