@DrHannahWhite kicks us off and introduces our guests. There have been many changes to the way parliament works during the pandemic. Some have been positive, others have caused controversy.
We start with a quick question to Tracey Crouch about the Football Review announced yesterday. Tracey Crouch: It is undoubtedly the case that the news on the ESL has triggered this review.
TC: The government will look at everything, and there is nothing off the table for the review.
Matthew Hamlyn: In March 2020, it became clear that the model of a crowded chamber in parliament and committees was not going to be viable. The trailblazers were the select committees.
MH: Voting was about as covid insecure as one can imagine. Both houses introduced electronic voting, the Lords stock with that, and the Commons began to use security passes to swipe and vote. The commons also expanded proxy voting.
Phillip Norton: parliament has done rather well compared to other nations in being able to continue with proceedings. The staff who made this possible are due a lot of credit.
PN: The electronic voting in the house of Lords is very convenient. Some say that it may be too convenient, simply opening the laptop and pressing a button.
PN: On the limitations of the system in place. There is no spontaneity, the system is very time consuming, and there has been a need to stop interventions. This has led to a lack of sense as to what the feeling of the chamber is.
PN: There are no informal spaces in the new digital system. Informal spaces are a vital part of parliamentary life, and for the integration of new members. This inherently favours the executive, as members can't get together easily to discuss what is happening.
PN: The informal dimension is also key in knowing what is happening in the other house. Portcullis house has been essential in the past. This is what is missing in the new covid-secure operation of parliament.
Tracey Crouch: There are two main challenges. The first, personally, is that she usually will spend her week in Westminster and be totally focused on parliament. Working from home, especially with a small child, complicates this.
TC: The procedural approach has been an issue too. After her personal experience with breast cancer she wanted to participate in a parliamentary discussion, but technical issues prevented it.
TC: Proxy Voting covers parental leave, but not bereavement leave. If we want a wider range of people coming into parliament, we need to make it more accessible.
TC: A lot of the conversations and work in parliament goes way beyond the chamber. Many issues could have been resolved by a conversation or discussion. There is no guarantee that a telephone call will be answered.
MH: There is now more data available about who is speaking in debates. This has led to a change in practice where the names of members who will take part in debates are published ahead of time in the commons.
MH: A big opportunity is with select committees. It is now easier to call a wider range of witnesses when they can do it on zoom, rather than have to come to Westminster for the day.
PN: On participation, there have been some positives. At question time there has been a broader range of peers participating. Before the questions were dominated by a much smaller number of peers.
PN: One aspect of this has been an increase in participation by women in the House of Lords, facilitated by the new online way of doing things. #IfGParliament
TC: Most work MPs do for constituents is casework. More work has been done during the pandemic on this than at any point in her 11 years in parliament.
TC: It has been harder to bring constituent issues before parliament in debate or adjournment debates. However it has still been possible, and it shouldn't be underestimated what MPs can do from their laptops.
TC: The truth is that, in the face of the pandemic, parliament had to put faith in the government to act quickly. As time has gone on, parliament has provided more scrutiny. Ideally we would have liked more discussion, but parliament had to act the way it did
TC: Some issues, like vaccine passports, will require parliamentary debate. This is not the same as the legislation that had to be done rapidly last year.
PN: There is always a need for a balance between speed and scrutiny. With time there is more capacity for scrutiny, and less need for speed of legislation. #IfGParliament
PN: Sometimes you will learn important information simply by bumping into people. You can contact people online, but it is much more clunky.
TC: MPs are working from home to stop the spread of the virus. Working from home is not more convenient, it is not easier, and MPs are not doing it because they are lazy.
When June comes 'I will be on that first train'
TC: The pandemic has let MPs see that working from home can work well. Going forward there will be more openness to flexible working arrangements, depending on staff needs.
PN: There will be desire for MPs and peers to have input in how things will proceed after the pandemic. There will be a balance between continuity and reversion.
MH: Things will likely work differently between the two houses. All the standing orders in the House of Commons have an expiry date, and could just lapse without any proactive decision by the house.
TC: Parliament is not just about parliamentary proceedings. It is for the people, and the public enjoy visiting parliament and speaking with people. MPs are looking forward to getting back to work.
The pandemic has had a huge impact on the way public services are delivered – from courts to hospitals. Years of innovation have happened in months. What can central govt do to embed new approaches?
@DrHannahWhite kicks us off and explains that @instituteforgov has had a longstanding interest in civil service skills and has been tracking the development of the Functions over the years #IFGcivilservice
Lord Maude has been asked to review the Cabinet Office - @bronwenmaddox will be discussing with him how it has performed, especially during the pandemic.
Lots of hope is being placed on Lord Maude's review. Maude says the TOR are very specific, looking at the spend controls, and the operation of the functions, HQ'd in the Cabinet Office, and to assess progress on Civil Service Reform since 2012.
A lot that was managed to be fudged in the centre during the coalition, but it 'can no longer be fudged' if we are concerned with the effectiveness of government.
Nick Davies is just introducing the speakers at our event on government outsourcing: David Lidington MP, Rachel Reeves MP, Richard Cockett from the Economist and our own Tom Sasse. Thread.
We are very grateful to the sponsor to this event - WLG Gowling - currently giving an introduction and stressing why it is important that we understand what works in outsourcing as well as why.
@tom_sasse: the debate over outsourcing has often generated "more heat than light" - our report aims to inform that debate in a constructive way