The destruction of the Arecibo telescope in Puerto Rico by neglect, with no plans to replace it, was just one of many tragedies last year, but it hit me personally very hard.
Now, China's FAST appears to have risen as a replacement -- a potent symbol.
Like much of the decaying infrastructure of the United States, the Arecibo telescope was built in the social-democratic period, before neoliberalism. It was not only a matter of pride for Puerto Rico, but also a tool used by scientists around the world.
What does it mean for the US empire that such infrastructure can, it seems, no longer be maintained? Or that no plan by which to systematically replace it is anywhere on the horizon?
What does it mean, or perhaps more importantly what else does it imply for global power politics, that China's FAST arrived right on time for the world's scientists to use it instead?
Neither the US nor the Chinese system is actually democratic, which is what socialists care about. Each in its own way is a powerful enemy of democracy. But one knows how to plan the economy, and one has forgotten it. We ought to internalize this & make our own plans accordingly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nothing is so exhausting -- or so triggers my own self-loathing, when I replicate it -- as the sneering tone of smug, self-satisfied nihilism and ironic detachment from one's own moral commitments which is the house style of everyone on this stupid website.
It's interesting from a litcrit point of view. Through the later part of the last century & the start of this one, something like this register of writing -- DFW called it "postmodern irony" -- was used for a very different reason.
As he explains in his famous TV essay, the point of this obligatory, flat-affect, preening cynicism towards the idea that anybody could ever believe in anything was to reconcile oneself to the (false) notion that all previous attempts at earnest commitment failed and had to fail.
Conservatism was rich people telling small business owners that taxes are theft & govt bureaucrats are a ruling class.
"National" conservatism is @AmericanAffrs cryptofascists telling rural workers & small business owners that the ruling class is urban workers & PMC kids in DSA.
While it is perhaps salutary that the right has discovered class exists -- if only because it allows public discussion to finally approach honesty -- all it has to offer by way of class analysis is scapegoats. Immigrants. "The [middle] managerial overclass." Pick your outgroup.
Actually understanding class society, however, & thus how we've gotten to this point, requires understanding who's making the production and investment decisions, and who must suffer the consequences without a say.
This, needless to say, remains beyond the ability of "natcons."
"The Bolivian dictatorship has announced that starting Monday it will arrest legislators from [@evoespueblo's] Movement Towards Socialism Party. [Arturo] Murillo, [a govt minister] who days ago spoke of a "hunt" being on, says he has a list of MPs to detain. This is very grave."
@evoespueblo I'm somebody who's been critical of Evo's decision to defy the referendum & run again (among other sins), and have pointed out the involvement of many parts of the Bolivian Left in recent protests.
But this coup is obscene. The new govt is a dictatorship. It must be stopped.
@evoespueblo Bolivian working-class and indigenous activists who have been critical of Evo and the MAS party seem to agree. They are rallying together in dual power spaces like the El Alto neighborhood in La Paz to fight the coup govt.
@the_point_mag At the heart of the essay is a simple question.
Socialism was dead — and that wasn’t just an illusion.
So how has it suddenly returned in such force?
My youth was haunted by a narrative of inevitably failed revolutions (eg Orwell’s Animal Farm).
Now everything’s changed. Why?
@the_point_mag I’d wager the reason answering such a question (if you even can) takes so long — 17,000 words is, as you’ll see, little more than a surface skim — is it requires a whole theory of historical change.
It needs a story tying individuals, society, culture, politics, & economics.
Part of the reason the Russia story matters to the radical Left is that it’s helped reveal the extent to which Russian intelligence have been using sockpuppet accounts to promote both “Left” and fascist positions which benefit them.