Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
David Menschel Profile picture
Twitter logo
20 Apr, 9 tweets, 5 min read
1. I’m going to start a thread as a way of documenting the use of the repulsive euphemism “officer involved shooting” as a way of documenting its use and shaming the reporters and news outlets that use it.
2. In April 2021 @WKBN, ostensibly a news outlet, used the euphemism “officer-involved shooting.”
3. In April 2021 @KOINNews, ostensibly a news outlet, used the euphemism “officer-involved shooting.” koin.com/news/crime/sus…
4. In April 2021 @LaceyCrisp, ostensibly a reporter, used the euphemism “officer-involved shooting.”
5. In April 2021, The Columbus Dispatch, ostensibly a newspaper, used the term “officer involved” shooting. dispatch.com/story/news/cri…
6. In April 2021 @alexiswsyx6 @wsyx6 ostensibly a reporter, used the term “officer-involved shooting.”
7. In April 2021 #WCMH @nbc4i ostensibly a news outlet, used the euphemism “officer-involved shooting.” nbc4i.com/news/local-new…
8. In April 2021, @jmuhammadtv, ostensibly a reporter, used the euphemism “police involved shooting.”
9. In April 2021 @danpearlman, ostensibly a reporter, used the euphemism “officer involved shooting.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with David Menschel

David Menschel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidminpdx

David Menschel Profile picture
22 Apr
1. The new ultra-conservative Supreme Court abandons the more muscular understanding of Miller/Montgomery which demanded that a judge find a juvenile is “permanently incorrigible” before sentencing a juvenile to life without the possibility of parole. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
2. The court guts 100,000s of hours of work by lawyers like me and others to end the barbarous practice of sentencing children to LWOP. It says that so long as a judge has discretion to sentence a child to less than LWOP, the constitution is satisfied.
3. This is pretty deep in the weeds, but in some ways today’s ruling by Kavanaugh is the fault of Justice Kagan whose poorly written opinion in Miller v. Alabama (as opposed to Kennedy’s broader Montgomery) makes such a retrogression easy.
Read 14 tweets
David Menschel Profile picture
10 Apr
1. Here I am what 10 paragraphs into this truly garbage fear-mongering piece of bullshit “journalism” and it hasn’t mentioned: the DA tried this for a year — a year when violent crime was up in many places — and in FELL in Baltimore.
2. It’s also yet to mention this new study that shows that PRECISELY the “tough on crime” behavior that the article *assumes would make crime go down ACTUALLY MAKES CRIME, INCLUDING VIOLENT CRIME GO UP. bostonglobe.com/2021/03/29/met…
3. The entire frame of the article is bad and wrong AND CONTRADICTED BY SCIENCE. This piece is akin to climate change denialism. It’s not journalism grounded in objective reality, it’s journalism grounded in false and ignorant bias.
Read 4 tweets
David Menschel Profile picture
9 Apr
1. The desire to denigrate the “defund the police” movement – an important goal of reactionary-liberal media-commentators who enjoy punching left – erases the massive value and deep insight that "defund the police" protests last summer brought to the fore.
2. Prior to last summer police reform mostly focused on improved training, systems to hold officers accountable, using new technologies (like body cams), etc. i.e. *things that were budget neutral or even increased police funding and didn’t shrink the scope of policing.
3. The insight of the “defund the police” movement is a recognition that police play too large a role in our understanding of and approach to public safety. And reforms must go beyond “reformist reforms” and instead that *shrink the scope* of policing and/or reduce budget,
Read 11 tweets
David Menschel Profile picture
8 Apr
1. So much of the focus on progressive prosecutors is about the “front-end” – i.e. new cases. But if you want to see what a progressive prosecutor can do on the “back-end” – i.e. bringing justice to old cases – look to New Orleans DA Jason Williams. thelensnola.org/2021/04/08/new…
2. Once you’re convicted, the legal system imposes so many barriers to getting your conviction overturned, even when your trial was clearly unjust – time bars, procedural rules, etc. It stacks the deck against you in so many ways.
3. Often innocent people, people convicted via misconduct/ineffective counsel or cases where racism infected trial cannot get relief, not because their substantive claim is insufficient, but because of a procedural bar preventing their substantive claim from being adjudicated.
Read 7 tweets
David Menschel Profile picture
5 Apr
This piece by @ryanlcooper @TheWeek is easily the best piece I’ve read on the relationship between progressive prosecutors, policing and the pandemic-year’s violent crime spike. theweek.com/articles/97515…
As the article points out, reactionary forces blame progressive DAs like Larry Krasner for a nation-wide spike in shootings. But that’s preposterous. Krasner prosecutes more than 98% of shootings. The problem is police – who solve fewer than 20% of them. theweek.com/articles/97515…
This article smartly rejects the typical ruse that almost all crime journalists fall for: police unions blame “reform” for every spike in serious crime to distract from the fact that police are so bad at what they do that they rarely solve serious crime. theweek.com/articles/97515…
Read 4 tweets
David Menschel Profile picture
1 Apr
1. Yesterday I watched a pretty remarkable hearing in New Orleans where thirteen men convicted by nonunanimous juries, some decades ago, were resentenced, mostly to time served. If I were a criminal law professor, I would assign it to students. nola.com/news/courts/ar…
2. It was unlike anything I had ever seen in a courtroom. In most courtrooms, one rarely sees people, defendants or otherwise, take responsibility for the harm that they caused. Our system rarely incentivizes that. But this was different.
3. All of the men were convicted by nonunanimous juries – juries that the Supreme Court has said were “racist” and violate the 6th Amendment. But that didn’t mean they were legally entitled to be retried. Law in this area is complex and “finality” is often preferred over justice.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @davidminpdx has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @davidminpdx!

Read all threads by @davidminpdx