I wrote about something Facebook should break more often: the glass in front of its toxic content dial

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Facebook can turn down the distribution on "borderline content" that approaches the line of breaking the rules. And it does, in emergency situations. But it's never explained why it doesn't do that all the time.
Indeed, in 2018, one Mark Zuckerberg argued they should

facebook.com/notes/75144900…
We argue a lot about individual posts. But an individual piece of content is a mere drop in the ocean of Facebook content; the underlying systems that move this content around are the tides. When you're weathering a storm, what matters is the tides.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with evelyn douek

evelyn douek Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @evelyndouek

16 Mar
Content Moderation in the stack watch

This is an incredibly useful article. The obvious fact that we need different approaches for different services/layers goes underappreciated.

We've been here before: a Universalizing approach does not work
That's the easy part, though. Working out the different obligations in different contexts is the hard part, and we've barely started.
Read 4 tweets
17 Feb
"Content-moderation decisions are momentous but they are as momentous as they are bc of fb’s engineering decisions & other choices that determine which speech proliferates... & in what context [users] see it"

Great op-ed by @JameelJaffer & @KGlennBass

nytimes.com/2021/02/17/opi…
I think it's unlikely the @OversightBoard will take their recommendation to refuse to answer the question abt Trump's account until fb commissions & publishes a study abt the lead up to Jan. 6

(Altho I think it should and likely will recommend such a study in their decision)
But what if they do? A fun hypothetical for this wannabe law professor to imagine.

A possible "constitutional" show down!
Read 7 tweets
11 Feb
It's quite remarkable to see the extent of serious engagement with the public comment process at the fb @OversightBoard re: Trump's account

Here's a strong letter from, amongst others, @rickhasen, @davidakaye and @alexstamos

politico.com/f/?id=00000177…
Things I'm curious about:
1. If the decision goes against public comment, will that discourage future participation?
2. Level of intl engagement
3. If future overseas cases can also garner such considered engagement (I sure hope so!)
Really starting to regret not putting my comment on letterhead...

Read 17 tweets
26 Jan
"The First Amendment of the era aided us. The guarantee of free speech is for democracy; it is worth little, in the end, apart from it."

Great @emilybazelon piece.

Fun fact from this humble foreign observer...

nytimes.com/2021/01/26/mag…
The US has a rich tradition of seeing the 1A as existing to facilitate democracy and self-government. Australia drew on that thinking in implying a freedom of political communication into its Constitution which, famously, has no right to free speech.
During the same period (as Emily documents, drawing on @glakier's work), the US itself moved way from that tradition, adopting an increasingly libertarian view of the 1A instead.
Read 5 tweets
11 Jan
I want Facebook to refer its suspension of Trump's account to the @OversightBoard. You should too.

lawfareblog.com/facebook-overs…
absolutely nailed the spelling of "too" this time ☺️
@OversightBoard Checks and balances shouldn't exist only for decisions taken against the winds of public opinion. Facebook should allow oversight of its most high-profile and controversial content moderation decision yet.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
After thinking about it, I think Facebook should refer its Trump suspension to the @OversightBoard, and it should use the expedited process to do so.

You should to.
This is one of the most consequential and high profile decisions in content moderation, and we don't trust that it was made on principal rather than business expediency.

This is *exactly* what the @OversightBoard and its expedited process is for. If not now, when?
The usual calls for @OversightBoard intervention are quiet, but we should not only want checks and balances for decisions we agree with.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!