Does it really matter that the FTC lost its 13(b) authority? The FTC has been irrelevant for 30 years, ever since Tim Muris pioneered using that authority.

If Congress wants to act, it should make a private right of action to enforce the FTC Act.
@PharmaCheats
As @chopraftc notes, there are other things the FTC can do, like write rules or use dormant penalty authority.
Fundamentally, the FTC is not relevant to Wall Street or most actors in the economy because it hasn't actually held the powerful accountable for 30 years. Why should we care that the FTC just lost authority it started using at the time it became irrelevant?
I'm not opposed to Congress restoring 13B, but I would prefer (a) shutting down the Bureau of Economics (b) firing of senior staff and (c) a real top to bottom review to find out what other horrible messes the FTC caused similar to the Google 2012 corrupt fiasco.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Stoller

Matt Stoller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matthewstoller

21 Apr
Lina Khan being introduced by @SenAmyKlobuchar at Khan's nomination hearing. c-span.org/video/?511008-…
And now @SenBlumenthal also introduces Lina Khan. Seems like she's well-liked.
Senator Cantwell asks Lina Khan about the collapse of local news in the face of Google and Facebook. Khan responds by saying there are dominant gatekeepers, and that there are problems - "potential criminal activity" - in adtech.
Read 8 tweets
20 Apr
"While the FTC is quick to bring down the hammer on small businesses, companies like Google know that the FTC is simply not serious about holding them accountable."

🔥🔥🔥
"First, we must make clear that FTC orders are not suggestions. Google isn't the only repeat offender. In 2012, after the FTC finalized an order with Facebook on privacy abuses, the company violated the agreement almost immediately – and continued
violating it again and again."
Senate Commerce Committee hearing now with FTC commissioners. commerce.senate.gov/2021/4/strengt…
Read 9 tweets
18 Apr
The US is so much better than anywhere else on this front it’s not funny. I know people think Germany has ‘dealt with their past’ but German self-reflection is mostly a performative bad joke.
I don’t get the constant reflexive loathing of America as a nation. It’s weird. This is a good place with a good people.
The reason Germany is so ‘good at self-reflection’ is because the US and USSR utterly destroyed their military and occupied their nation for years after they caused TWO WORLD WARS. It’s not as if they woke up one day and said ‘let’s be better people.’
Read 4 tweets
15 Apr
Ok the House Judiciary committee is marking up the antitrust big tech report.
Now @RepAndyBiggsAZ tries to attach an amendment on reforming Section 230 to the big tech report because of attacks on conservatives.

Ugh. Section 230 is handled in a *different committee.*

This committee handles *breaking up big tech.*
There is clearly anti-conservative bias, but it is complex. They kicked Donald Trump off of Twitter, Facebook, etc, and stripped Parler of cloud services. Breaking up big tech will help that. There is no reason for either side to fight over this.
Read 17 tweets
13 Apr
1. The GOP has been aggressive about big tech, at least rhetorically. Clarence Thomas, for instance, called Google a monopoly twice last week. But there's also resistance, with some Republican using heated rhetoric in public but opposing action. mattstoller.substack.com/p/why-is-clare…
2. Tomorrow is when we get to see who is serious. There will be a symbolic vote on the most important work on big tech that has happened in our political system, a vote on whether the Judiciary Committee will adopt its investigative report on big tech. judiciary.house.gov/calendar/event…
3. The report is the result of a 16-month investigation of Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook, more than 1.3 million docs reviewed, hundreds of interviews, and 7 hearings. It was done in a bipartisan way. It was groundbreaking.

But there's a problem. mattstoller.substack.com/p/congress-get…
Read 14 tweets
8 Apr
1. @Diddy is making a populist argument. He's not just asking for black representation but black *ownership.* And ownership matters. It's a different and more fundamental claim than how progressives tend to think about social justice.
2. @Diddy is also taking a swipe at Comcast when he says "It’s disrespectful that distributors refuse to carry Black-owned media brands in an era where our impact and influence is undeniable." revolt.tv/news/2021/4/8/…
3. I wrote up a piece on black ownership in the cable business, the first major media business emerging after the Civil Rights movement. @Diddy is an important part of the story, as is Comcast's monopolization. prospect.org/power/remote-c…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!