Disappointing to here CPC denied the proposed project at the 3G intersection. I'll post more thoughts after watching the video, but it sounds like it got veto'd by neighborhood pastoralists again. lakewood.advocatemag.com/2021/04/22/dal…
So glad we get to keep this streetscape a while longer instead of 10' sidewalks and 15 affordable units.
Ahhhh, we might see the roof from the lake or something!
We must preserve the neighborhood character of Grand Avenue!
Ever since I was stairpilled by @holz_bau I've been curious why scissors stairways don't count for two stairways even if fire separated, so I just started flipping through old versions of the IBC.
FYI: I am not an architect or engineer, or design professional of any sort.
The first mention I saw of it was in the 2003 IBC. I found a note in a code forum that they'd heard it was because of terrorism concerns after the WTC attacks.
Sure enough, in the NIST report, they specifically mention that scissor stairs shouldn't be allowed to count as multiple stairs.
Just tuned into the CPC hearing, they're currently voting on whether to allow a .3 acre lot to be subdivided into 2 parcels...some don't want to allow it because it isn't consistent with neighborhood character...ugh.
The reasoning? While there are smaller lots in the neighborhood, but there are also lots this size, so we shouldn't get rid of it?
Now commissioners are confused about the zoning vs. the platting. They're not sure what happens with the zoning. Fortunately it's in the staff report.
Like many cities, Dallas started downzoning ("backzoning") large swaths of the city. In this 1977 article they discuss a proposal to downzone 120 blocks all at once. Conveniently timed just before election day!
A frequently cited reason for requesting downzoning is that banks wouldn't lend on single-family homes in areas zoned multi-family. Is there any truth to this? @JakeAnbinder
It's been a hot week. You know what'd help with that? Parking Reform. Guess what? Today the ZOAC is discussing this very topic! 🥳
Sadly, there are 2 topics ahead of Parking Reform, including amending P(A) districts. This is very arcane! Funny enough, I actually own a property with one of the few P(A) districts in Dallas!
Basically ZOAC is discussing allowing amendments to P(A) districts to go through a less onerous process than a full zoning review.
The article just barely touches on the remaining factor: "land costs", lack of construction sites and NIMBY-ism which are interrelated and definitely largely within the City's control.
Dallas' residential land is zoned for about 85% detached single family homes. Another 10% allows only low-rise moderate density housing. We don't even really allow ADUs!