Ok, lets assume that Devonta was actually 21 and only look at those guys.
EEK.
Ok, lets remove the age filter and change it to seniors (what Devonta is).
Ok.... But lets now switch it to juniors and give Devonta the benefit of the doubt that he could have declared early last year and been a first round pick.
Ok, now we are removing the senior/junior filter and are tackling breakout age.
Here are the guys with an age 20 breakout age.
But Devonta *could* have broken out at 18 or 19 if he didnt play at Alabama so lets flip it to them.
Devonta would need to gain 30 pounds to qualify for alpha status, but lets presume that EVERYONE else's weight was inflated at the combine due to water weight and the only legitimate non-water inflated weight was Devonta's 166 pounds.
So our assumption is that he is closer to alpha than the weigh-ins would lead us to believe.
The Alphas tend to hit a lot when they hit in this range.
IF Devonta's 166 is in fact real, as is everyone else's weigh-in... Here are the Coinflip Betas
The hits tend to be one-hit wonders so far... And Calvin Ridley of course
I also thought I fixed it but it looks like his top 5 finish from last season is missing. Pretend its there
So like, Devonta would have been a much better prospect IF the following would have happened.
Henry Ruggs didnt hold him back from breaking out at 19.
He was an early declare
He dominated consistently
And he was an age 21 rookie...
If those would have happened... he'd have fit in this category:
So in summary, if he was a totally different prospect, he'd be a lot better prospect.
Until then, he will remain a Coinflip and no amount of configuring will change that.
If you are into a bunch of useless but fun analysis like this, I went through this with the patrons a month or two ago. 🤣
One of the best ways to win fantasy football championships is by rostering the RB that breaks out out of nowhere
This is a hard feat to pull off as there are approximately 3700 options
I would like to introduce you to one of the bets that you simply have to make
Sean Tucker.
From a size and athleticism perspective Sean Tucker looks the part. Per @rotounderworld in the screen shot above Tucker measured in at a fairly robust 5-9 and 207 pounds while running a 90th-percentile 4.44 40.
We like that very much.
@rotounderworld Was Sean Tucker a one-dimensional runningback in college or was he trusted in all aspects of the game?
As evidenced by his 75th-percentile college dominator and his 95th-percentile target share, it is pretty clear that the offence in Syracuse ran through Sean Tucker.
If y'all want me to say, "Voldemort has peripheral metrics that suggest that he might be better than the 10% target share and 8 fantasy ppg player that he's been" then Ill admit it.
I am in fact expecting him to have greater than 10% targets and 8 fantasy ppg this season.
There are two things at play here.
#1 - The binary notion of is he "good or evil" at football.
#2 - Regardless of #1, is he a good pick in any format?