Almost all aesthetic signals get coopted from the unacceptable fringes where energy is, into the mainstream (laser eyes, wojacks, pepe, Very Online stuff) which desires their vigor
This is a fractally illustrative feature of decentralization, how "what's next" becomes status quo
Most secular values, that is, principles on which actions are taken or not to create, destroy, or sustain material realities, are post hoc rationalizations
Almost all your own conceptions of "the good" come FIRST as an aesthetic inclination, thereafter are articulated as values
Genuine spiritual values (mortification is people basically identifying the wrong ebd of this) are ones which are unchanging, universal, and do not serve petty material concerns—so they often impose great material penalties on their adherents.
Being so unyielding, they are fixed in value. Any exchange, any decision, can use them as reliable pivots and anchor points. What is fashionable is ever changing. News is ever changing. Real commitments and history are unchanging, yielding aesthetic remove from the 'mainstream'.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In addition to NYers fun site design/cute artwork, this stood out:
"Two colleges in Pyongyang..often outperform American and Chinese colleges in the International Collegiate Programming Contest—a festival of **unsurpassed and joyful nerdery**."
there is a baseline of quantitative/logical knowhow that separates cognitively gifted people from the average—and a degree of grit, the ability to suffer with a purpose...and a canny, cunning nature, that separates the merely academically competent from real *killers*.
None of us are going to stop North Korea's cyber hackers. Again, ignore the news for what it is/The USA is over, etc. but look at this;
conservatives—a political species *only as old as WW2* keep opening a door labeled "FREE CANDY" are hit with a cattle prod and wail as it closes...they blink through the tears and greedily read:
Over time their generations; cohorts with as much proximity to the issue as you might get from being a young college republican to an elder statesman conservative organizer, die off/become unmotivated/make peace with loss
but, we can say biologically that to best avoid: severe birth defects, lower IQs, shorter lifespans, allergies, or straight up miscarriage/infertility, in general, most often, women should aim to have kids closer to 20 than 30
you know that whole 'holy shit lol @steak_umm is flexing on NDT' stuff? that drives significant interest to their product and personifies it with an upmarket yet irreverent position
strongest player in Brands Letting Hair Down arena
a human/s wrote the tweets, though
their corporate entity doesnt tell you who wrote it
not just to shield them from the potential retributive depredations of Neil de Grasse Tyson after dunking on him so hard (NDT leaves through the window..)
but also bc it *doesn't matter* for the actual project
essentially, women want to admire their man—it is a different respect and love than adoration; mentally and physically upwards
otherwise, women feel like they are caretaking a boy, a lout, someone lesser, or worse, feel BIG and MANNISH
awful! this is well understood w/ height
women, in the main, prefer a man is a bit taller
almost no women, cross culturally *prefer* a shorter partner—even short women do not; there is some evidence to suggest their taller height preference is even stronger than some taller womens'!