Battle for Brick Lane
The planning policy argument against Truman Brewery decision 5pm today
I asked to speak tonight as well but I missed deadline by a few hours & 5 people already registered
But I would have said that planning is a balancing act based on planning policies 1/
But not how planning works in TH, planning department won’t present a balanced view of what their & GLA policies say but as they support this development they will only quote policies that support this application
Not those policies which do not support this application 2/
These tweets try & supply a balancing corrective by quoting from the TH Local Plan 2031 towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgnl/planning_…
Most Cllrs voted to approve this Plan last January (I didn’t) so they should be familiar with them
Decision makers (Cllrs tonight) have to weigh all of the policies
3/
before deciding whether to approve/reject
Council report tonight makes clear tonight the range of employment & economic uses of the wider Truman Brewery site. this is a key issue, the range of employment
To be replaced by offices, 1 restaurant, 15 shops democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/documents/s184… 4/
TH Council have so far resisted any attempt to consider the impact of COVID on the office market, maybe too soon but I think clear demand will be less in future (see Canary Wharf)
The pictures are from TH Local Plan document policy (my red boxes) which I think provide policy 5/
argument against this
Why is Brick Lane attractive? why do tourists, shoppers, residents go there? will this application help?
What kind of jobs are therefore attracted?
Are they the same kind of jobs & employment offered in office space or even new shops?
I would say no 7/
I think this is a risk that Brick Lane becomes just another office neighbourhood with less footfall
& will generate fewer of the types of jobs / business that exist today
We do not lack office space in London anymore but we do not have enough employment places like Brick Lane 8/
Truman Brewery may not be a formal ‘market’ but in practice that is what it is
I am not clear 15 new shops will be an adequate replacement
So Council policy to protect markets should be relevant
These are all policies that should be part of the planning decision tonight 9/
There are a wide range of other relevant policies but this one about Heritage is also relevant
I believe there are enough planning policies to justify refusal tonight
If it does get permission then the same will happen to the wider area and a precious asset will be lost 10/
, an asset that generates a wide range of employment
I cannot see this application as currently configured will benefit TH
Not saying that there should not be a change but it has to be a change that better preserves character of the area & keeps wide range of people visiting
11/
It would also be good to know more about the new Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan policies and whether & how they apply to this application but only briefly mentioned 12/
This @TheEconomist article is very strange, odd & not really based on much evidence
It also repeats various myths without evidence, misses the big issues, and therefore comes to the wrong conclusions
A 🧵on its inaccuracies
a. no mention of leasehold or commonhold at all ! 1/
b. it correctly says these buildings are expensive which is true but then talks about land value in England as one main reason why tall towers in big cities are expensive
Economist article in black, my comments in red
The main reason why tall towers are expensive is 2/
because construction is v expensive
As evidence this agreement that Westferry Printworks could only deliver 21% affordable housing on a big site agreed by the developer, Tower Hamlets Council & the GLA
Construction costs £630 m
v
Land value £28m
v
Taxes (CIL & s106) = £49 m 3/
The issues are more extensive than @PlanningMag article states
Councillors who made the decision to reject the resident's Yes vote in favour of the business No vote
Incorrectly, used the wrong business turnout % to suggest a higher proportion of businesses voted than residents 1/
Proportionally more residents voted than businesses
Councillors were also not officially told that:
Some of the business votes were illegal (three people voted more than twice)
49.5% of all the business vote came from a single office building
Cllrs also not told that there was
2/
an active Police investigation underway
"amid suspicions of a “possible conspiracy to subvert the referendum”, allegation of multiple voting, and claims that some business owners had exerted “undue influence” to sway the vote against the council’s plan" standard.co.uk/news/london/po…
3/
Problems with Homes of Multiple Occupation (HMO) & why a man died due to Council inaction
A man died earlier this month in a flat fire, had the Council been more proactive and responsive he might still be alive but an attempt to get them to do so in January 2021 was rejected 1/
18 people, primarily students and delivery couriers from Bangladesh, lived in a 2-bedroom former Council flat at the time of the fire, 22 beds were seen in the property including in the kitchen (mainly bunk beds)
2/
The owner had bought the leasehold flat in 2005 but the freeholder was Tower Hamlets Council and the managing agent Tower Hamlets Homes, their arm's length management agency
Neighbours made complaints about number of people & leaks from the bathroom in late 2021 and 2022
3/
New independent private primary school in Canary Wharf planning application
CW Group has applied to build a new 9-storey (thin but tall) nursery and primary school in the middle of Wood Wharf
402 pupils (150 nursery pupils and 252 primary school pupils) and 80 FTE staff 1/
Summary here constructing-london.com/wood-wharf-sch…
This would be a fee-paying school separate from the Mulberry Primary state school already built opposite this proposed new school so there would be 2 schools on site
2/
It will be run by inspiredlearninggroup.co.uk/about-us/about… and would be the 3rd private school in the area including River House & Faraday
I assume CW Group are behind the idea of building a new private school as will generate a long run income and be popular with some of their new residents
3/
Local Plan consultation response - why the Local Plan needs to change
1st round of consultations on the new Local Plan ended on Wednesday - 2nd round of consultation should be later this year after they publish the draft policies
I wrote a 13 page response to it raising some 1/
of some of my issues with it & planning here in general
Fundamentally the objective of recent London and Local Plans has been to push most development in Tower Hamlets to Aldgate, Aberfeldy, Isle of Dogs including Blackwall & other parts of Poplar 2/
Development in most of the rest of Tower Hamlets is discouraged even when they have better transport links and better infrastructure than the growth areas listed above 3/
I went to the @ConHome Defence & Security Conference today
Several questions from audience about what will happen in Ukraine
All those who answered said, they don't know the outcome
That assumes Britain has a passive role
Britain could determine the outcome by helping Ukraine 1/
More western weapons would put Ukraine in a stronger position to win
(in the same way western support helped USSR defeat Nazi Germany) @BWallaceMP mentioned 250 vehicles sent by Britain
But Ukrainians crowdfunded to buy 101 ex-British Army armoured
vehicles themselves
(Ukrainians in UK find this harder to do as UK donation websites won't allow similar campaigns in the UK to buy 'weapons')
That we had 101 retired armoured vehicles incl. ambulances ready to go but were on the open market for sale suggests Britain not as
3/