All of our readers are welcome—encouraged—to participate. We’ll be running a number of excellent essays about fossil fuels, nuclear power, and green tech; we’ll be taking all questions from our readers—as well as submissions, should they wish to write at length.
At the end of the week, we’ll wrap it up with a Grand Cosmopolicast Debate ... followed by the announcement of a winner.
We aim to showcase a wide variety of opinions, because we wish not only to discuss energy without partisanship or empty slogans--
--but to demonstrate, conclusively, this point: *contact with an opinion not one’s own will not cause any participant, nor any reader, spontaneously to combust.*
We understand some of you are unsure of this and think it's a crazy risk:
but we are *so confident* that no one will spontaneously combust--indeed, that speech we dislike is *nothing at all* like violence in any way--that we're willing to put our own lives on the line.
Watch us as we entertain views with which we disagree--all day long!
And live to tell the tale!
According to our theory, by the end of the week, we'll all be alive, and indeed, smarter and better for having encountered many different opinions.
If you agree with this theory, join us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I agree with @AmbJohnBolton. It isn't a matter of "if" the Taliban resume control. They will resume control, boosting the morale and gladdening the heart of every lunatic jihadi in the world. And here's what will happen:
The Taliban will roll over Kabul. Scenes of utter horror and depravity will follow. Washington will realize--as it did when ISIS rolled over Mosul--that this is a serious problem and can't be ignored.
Since it will be impossible to persuade Americans to send ground troops back to Afghanistan--not least because it would be an admission that leaving was a grievous mistake--we will deal with this as we dealt with Mosul; i.e.,
Disgust is my first reaction too, for what it's worth, but it isn't worth much. I've been trying to assemble my thoughts to write about this phenomenon, but I can't yet understand--*really* understand--what's behind this worldview. I wish the interviewer had asked this:
1. Do you believe Covid19 is real? 2. If not, have you tried to confirm this by going to hospitals and looking for Covid patients? By asking people you know if they've had it, or know someone who has? How many did you ask?
3? If not, what makes you think it's not real?
4. If you think it's real, why wouldn't you wish to take measures to stop its spread? 5. If you don't think these measures reduce the risk of spreading it, why not? 6. How do you explain why your views diverge so sharply with those of people who deal with this disease daily?
Last year, during the first wave, India seemed to be one of the world’s success stories. Now it is chaotic, terrified, and helpless. Cases are zooming up.
Patients and families are turned away, sobbing, from hospitals that have no beds. On social media, the clamor for oxygen cylinders, ventilators, and antibiotics grows louder and more desperate. The government dithers over lockdowns. Political rivals point fingers.
Television presenters scream of government incompetence. Vaccination centers run out of vaccines. Despair and death are ubiquitous.
As the Cosmopolitan Globalists have argued—at length—the United States is the only country that could end the pandemic.
I wish to report that I've discovered a 100 percent excellent way to recycle the San Pellegrino bottles, and I'm so pleased by this that I must take to Twitter *immediately* to tell the world.
I've had five of them lying around since forever. I felt guilty about that, too. They weren't expensive, but I feel guilty about anything I buy and don't use. The problem: They're too big for seedlings. Filling them with soil is costly.
Behold the empty San Pellegrino bottle:
(I've cut holes in it. You have to look closely. I didn't do a very attractive job, but they're about to be covered in soil.)
I just woke up and only just saw about the (condign) George Floyd verdict. I'm baffled by the emotions people are feeling. I'm seeing reports of joyful celebration, as if it's a football game. But this verdict can't undo his death. Shouldn't this be a somber moment?
There are two tragedies here: Floyd's death and whatever killed Chauvin's soul. One man will never live again, the other is will live in a prison cell, a pariah and symbol of depravity. What's happy about this outcome?
Justice is a sober thing. A necessary thing. But it can't be, in a case like this, a joyful thing. There's no way to make it right. Only just.
The whole thing just makes me sad and sick.
I don't get the celebrations.