“Owning the libs” often seems to be the only defining feature of the artist formerly known as conservatism. On its face, this should be weird: Why should so many people be so invested in what they imagine will make strangers mad? Strangers who mostly will never know or care?
It seems like a sort of fantasy version of acting out for attention. “I feel small and unimportant. But in my imagination, urban grad students are enraged that I eat meat and endanger my loved ones. When I imagine them mad, I imagine they care what I do, therefore I matter.”
Call this exhibit A. Nobody knows this oaf is unvaccinated when he walks into Target. Nobody is “shaking.” But imagining them shaking lets him imagine he’s significant. It’s all a little heart on the sleeve though, isn’t it?
I should note this tracks the sort of thing I’ve gotten from grumpy MAGA types in response to a piece I wrote about vaccine certificates. People I have never met & will never meet are very invested in fantasizing about me cross-eyed & livid with rage over their medical choices.
All I can think is: How starved for love do you have to be that you’ve got to resort to fantasizing about a stranger’s rage just to be able to feel like you matter to somebody?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julian Sanchez

Julian Sanchez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @normative

1 Apr
The discussion around “vaccine passports” would be immensely improved if we could separate two questions: (1) Is it desirable to have a secure mechanism for authenticating vaccine status for at least some use cases, and (2) when & where is such authentication appropriate?
The answer to (1) is pretty easy: “Yes, obviously.” We already have a mechanism of sorts—those little cards everyone posts on their Instagram post-jab—it’s just not particularly secure. Anyone with a printer can make one.
Clearly (2) is a lot thornier and more contentious. I think for the most part we should give private entities latitude to determine the circumstances where verification is necessary—it’s cumbersome enough that I doubt many will do it frivolously. But it’s a separate question.
Read 7 tweets
30 Mar
I keep seeing this being misinterpreted. The judge is evaluating a potential charge of *making terrorist threats* (like announcing you’ve planted a bomb in a public building, which is harmful & a crime whether you really have or not).
With respect to *that specific charge* the judge is being totally reasonable. Talking on a private small group chat might well be (an element of) conspiracy to commit the crime you’re talking about, but it’s not a public threat.
If you were talking about kidnapping someone (or doing some other violence) on a publicly accessible forum, then the very same conversation might indeed be a terrorist threat.
Read 5 tweets
24 Feb
One of many, many, many things I don’t understand about Imaginary 230 is that online fora with OBVIOUSLY non-neutral moderation policies have existed since long before 230.
Political & Religious boards. Listservs. Chat rooms. Blog comment sections. Online games. Thousands upon thousands upon thousands of different platforms and sub-platforms. All protected by 230. Like many folks, I’ve made use of all of these since way back in college.
Never, in all that time, did I hear anyone ever suggest that any of these platforms had some legal obligation to be neutral. That gay chats had to allow anti-gay trolls. That I would open myself to legal liability if I deleted comments on my blog I found rude or unpleasant.
Read 6 tweets
15 Feb
@juliagalef @slatestarcodex Well, the post is still thoughtful and interesting. But yeah, I think if you pushed a little, you’d find almost nobody actually categorically opposed to content warnings. The real dispute is which cases are appropriate & which are merely performative.
@juliagalef @slatestarcodex Imagine a film class studying “Straw Dogs” or “A Clockwork Orange.” How many people are seriously going to say it’s inappropriate to warn the students up front that these films contain disturbing scenes of sexual violence? Virtually nobody, I’d wager.
@juliagalef @slatestarcodex If, OTOH, we’re talking about “trigger warnings” for classism & sexism in, I don’t know, 19th century novels, the objection isn’t really to content warnings pe se. It’s that adults don’t need to be told 19th century novels are classist & sexist...
Read 4 tweets
2 Feb
One thing recent years have highlighted is that we’ve been substantially kidding ourselves about the answer to the puzzle of why so many people vote & are otherwise politically engaged. radicalclassicalliberals.com/2021/02/02/wha…
The “puzzle” had been that from the POV of narrow self-interest, investing time & energy in learning about politics & voting can seem irrational. The probability of your individual engagement as a voter affecting the outcome in a statewide or national contest is virtually nil.
So why do people do it? Why invest the time & energy when, for 99.9% of people, it makes zero difference to the outcome? The optimistic answer is OF COURSE people aren’t just narrowly self-interested and act out of civic duty.
Read 6 tweets
2 Feb
I assume enough time has lapsed to talk about WandaVision ep 4? Fun detail I spotted on rewatch. When Wanda yeets Monica out of WestView, she crashes through an interior wall of the house, exterior wall, fence, and finally the force field around the town/TV world...
In other words, when Monica exits the sitcom realm for “reality” she... breaks the fourth wall.
Also, they tweaked what SWORD stands for. In the comics it’s “Sentient World Observation & Response Department.” The show makes it “Sentient Weapon...” and the director drops a line about how they’re increasingly relying on developing their own “sentient weapons”...
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!