Gone are the norms for decorum and political process. Swept away by constant bloviating, obstructionism, open disrespect, disinformation and personal smears.
While politics has always been fraught with conflict, generally reality wasn’t debated or created through discourse.
Democracy is a tricky concept to define. A few believe it’s limited to free and fair voting. Voting makes up a tangible part of democracy, but overall, democracy is a belief system. So it’s abstract in nature and difficult to fit into a narrow universal definition.
Democracy can be interpreted several ways by people with vast differences in ideology & values. And that ability to shift the meaning of democracy to reflect ideological belief systems always makes defining democracy tricky.
But in Canada, the definition was stable for decades.
That is until support for conservatism began to wane.
Canada started off as a conservative offshoot of the British Empire. Staunch, rigid, Eurocentric, and categorically British in nature.
Over time, the cultural zeitgeist became more liberal, humanist, moderate.
After WW2, Canada was defined by its banality, politeness, explicit humanism and its hodgepodge social safety net.
Known as the globe’s peacekeepers and for our conciliatory and moderate nature.
Who knew this branding was objectionable to the conservative far right?
There have been Prime Ministers that have redefined Canadian culture. Many would say for the better. Lester Pearson & Pierre Trudeau come to mind. They shared a vision of Canada that was a democratically robust, pluralist, mosaic of people with shared citizenship & human rights.
Democracy in Canada was defined by mid 20th century Liberals. Secular, with freedom for all faiths. Principled, with flexibility to adapt to modern needs and pressures. Stable, with defined rights and freedoms to encourage individuals & communities affirm their values & beliefs.
This was the Canada I grew up in and knew, loved and appreciated. For all its warts of past errors in judgement, Canada became almost an ideal. A refuge for all and a safe stable democracy to work towards social equality and democratic ideals.
But what were those ideals. What was the democracy Canada offered?
Intangible and abstract, we took them for granted and they are now under severe threat.
Democracy is fragile. It’s a narrow set of beliefs and behaviours that reflect those beliefs.
Trust is crucial to democracy. There’s no democracy if there’s no trust between citizens & leaders.
Democracy is entrusting elected representatives to govern in the best interests of all citizens. We may not agree on how, but we trust the greater good is the guiding principle.
Compromise is also foundational to democracy. If the best interests of all are the benchmark, compromise is a requirement. You know walking in you won’t get everything you want, but you’ll get enough to keep society functioning & peaceful.
Cooperation is required. Conflict is a part of politics and pluralism only aggravates the potential for conflict. So agreeing to ultimately cooperate for the good of all is essential.
Rule of Law is an extension of cooperation. We must all agree that the rule of law is paramount to ensure peace and stability. The laws apply to all equally. And we agree to uphold the laws to ensure reliability and consistency to all citizens. This reduces conflict.
Political Agency is afforded to every individual. Not just those who qualify to vote. Every resident of Canada, regardless of age, gender, race or sexuality has the ability to voice opinions, call for political action and seek to have their individual and community’s needs met.
Fairness is required for democracy. Inequities, hierarchies, special privileges, inconsistency in rule of law, all put pressure on a society. Reducing those pressures are conducive to strong democratic norms being adopted. Increasing pressures reduces commitment to democracy.
Facts are required for democracy. Democracy cannot function if reality is not established.
We can disagree on how to address reality, but if we don’t agree on what is fact and what is fiction, democracy is impossible to be established.
Concession to decision making is required to achieve democracy. Every political group (political party, special interest group, lobbyist, community) must agree to concede when a decision is made. Society can’t function if decisions aren’t made. All must respect final decisions.
Consideration is also a required element of democracy. Unless all individuals, groups and special interests acknowledge and tolerate plurality, democracy cannot be achieved.
Political Dissent is a crucial element to establish democracy. The ability to provide feedback to decisions made by govt is essential. But there are defined limits to methods of dissent. Obstruction isn’t dissent, it’s impeding a decision. Dissent is persuasion not coercion.
If these elements are observed and supported by the citizenry and elected leaders, a democratic society exists. In the absence of any one or more, it is a variation of autocracy.
So it’s always a curiosity to me that some people argue that because they continue to believe in democracy, that makes our province or nation democratic.
But that’s not how democracy works.
If the people in power don’t explicitly support democracy, it no longer exists.
Regardless of your personal beliefs and values, the absence of democratic beliefs by leadership negates any belief the citizenry has.
You cannot continue to call dictatorial leadership democratic. Well you can, but that is called deluded thinking. Refusing to accept reality.
And that is Alberta’s current situation.
UCP has destroyed trust, refused to compromise or cooperate with opposition, mocked rule of law and political agency, eliminated fairness and facts, refused to concede to public pressure, rejected plurality, & tried to eliminate dissent.
You’re deluded if you continue to believe Alberta continues to be a democracy. The party elected has attacked democracy on every front. Alberta has significantly shifted to autocratic governance.
Examine your own beliefs and stop trying to define your own reality.
@ThomasPSulliva2 @papillon4444 He is using Vassy’s show to legitimize the separatist movement’s complaints and attempting to separate the lunatic extremists from the main body of this movement.
But they’re one and the same.
The breach has seriously impacted the legitimacy of the separatist movement.
@ThomasPSulliva2 @papillon4444 Along with the data breach and the confirmation that both US and Russia are using propaganda on social media to manipulate perception, the legitimacy of the complaints of this group are now being seriously questioned.
@ThomasPSulliva2 @papillon4444 As they should be because they’re completely false.
Kenney, Smith & others are doing PR to maintain the perception that “western alienation” complaints are valid and hold substance. But they’re don’t.
@MyFirstSocialM2 @TheBreakdownAB Yes it is. Meaning this started long time ago with the 2018 yellow vest movement. When Kenney was still running for leadership of a merged party and relied on the votes of this movement to get elected as leader and the following year as premier.
@MyFirstSocialM2 @TheBreakdownAB The people in this movement have been radicalized into irrationality & extremism using the exact same tactics that radicalized Trump supporters. And before that, radicalized Russians about Ukrainian “Nazis” and before that radicalized young muslims to create ISIS 2013.
@MyFirstSocialM2 @TheBreakdownAB Where did these tactics come from?
It’s hybrid warfare. It’s the hacking of the human mind that was the chosen weapon after the failure of Russian annexation of Afghanistan.
Russia used hybrid warfare that resulted in the establishment of Al Qaeda & the Taliban.
When will the public realize that passing bill 54, despite the explicit warning, in addition to passing legislation giving immunity to the AG, should be considered a subversion of democracy by destroying the institution of free & fair elections?
EVERY ALBERTA VOTER’s personal voting data and unique voter code are now held by white supremacist separatists AND EVERY FOREIGN ADVERSARY who will now be able to sabotage EVERY Alberta provincial and municipal election in perpetuity without fear of being investigated.
There are real physical risks for some people who were doxxed.
But mainstream media is not doing its job.
The MAIN RISK is that free and fair elections WILL NOT EVER be POSSIBLE in Alberta ever again because EVERY ALBERTA VOTER’s personal data was compromised.
Withholding transfers will only help UCP to accelerate the displacement of public healthcare with for-profit healthcare.
So while symbolic in presenting a united front, this letter remains a deficient strategy. It will not engage the federal govt to ‘enforce’ compliance.
There continues to be complete confusion about the limits of federal and provincial power.
I’m guessing, but I imagine signatories think PMMC can fine UCP, charge UCP with a crime, or even step in to cancel or amend the legislation AB UCP have used to enable private healthcare.
Alberta has a corrupt… no, a deeply corrupt govt, which is actively working to harm the most vulnerable and redistribute resources and wealth to those who already have wealth and corporations that pay-to-play.
But because this is so counterintuitive and grossly unorthodox to established democracies, few even have the required mental framing to recognize it.
This is the mindset of most Albertans. Stunned shock, disbelief & confusion.
The wave looks familiar, but the danger isn’t recognized until it’s too late. Our brains are not hardwired to recognize danger unless we are familiar with the anomalies to recognize.
Human beings are at a disadvantage to other herding species of social mammals.
A former paper boy and a former mailroom clerk are trying to embarrass the PM because they’ve never actually worked a real job with real problems.
This is why life experience and NOT just education, should be a requirement for public service.
If you’ve only spread rumours and disinformation to harm political opponents & raise funds to pay for you to spread rumours & disinformation, you don’t get it. But if you’ve ever had real life experience, you know the PM job is to address the emergency, not discuss the emergency.
Maybe PMMC is actually working with other global leaders? Trying to prevent WW3?
Working with others is one of PMMC’s strong skills.
It’s not Scheer’s nor PP’s, so maybe they don’t know. Scheer and PP have no idea what work is, having never had a real job in the real world.