Gone are the norms for decorum and political process. Swept away by constant bloviating, obstructionism, open disrespect, disinformation and personal smears.
While politics has always been fraught with conflict, generally reality wasn’t debated or created through discourse.
Democracy is a tricky concept to define. A few believe it’s limited to free and fair voting. Voting makes up a tangible part of democracy, but overall, democracy is a belief system. So it’s abstract in nature and difficult to fit into a narrow universal definition.
Democracy can be interpreted several ways by people with vast differences in ideology & values. And that ability to shift the meaning of democracy to reflect ideological belief systems always makes defining democracy tricky.
But in Canada, the definition was stable for decades.
That is until support for conservatism began to wane.
Canada started off as a conservative offshoot of the British Empire. Staunch, rigid, Eurocentric, and categorically British in nature.
Over time, the cultural zeitgeist became more liberal, humanist, moderate.
After WW2, Canada was defined by its banality, politeness, explicit humanism and its hodgepodge social safety net.
Known as the globe’s peacekeepers and for our conciliatory and moderate nature.
Who knew this branding was objectionable to the conservative far right?
There have been Prime Ministers that have redefined Canadian culture. Many would say for the better. Lester Pearson & Pierre Trudeau come to mind. They shared a vision of Canada that was a democratically robust, pluralist, mosaic of people with shared citizenship & human rights.
Democracy in Canada was defined by mid 20th century Liberals. Secular, with freedom for all faiths. Principled, with flexibility to adapt to modern needs and pressures. Stable, with defined rights and freedoms to encourage individuals & communities affirm their values & beliefs.
This was the Canada I grew up in and knew, loved and appreciated. For all its warts of past errors in judgement, Canada became almost an ideal. A refuge for all and a safe stable democracy to work towards social equality and democratic ideals.
But what were those ideals. What was the democracy Canada offered?
Intangible and abstract, we took them for granted and they are now under severe threat.
Democracy is fragile. It’s a narrow set of beliefs and behaviours that reflect those beliefs.
Trust is crucial to democracy. There’s no democracy if there’s no trust between citizens & leaders.
Democracy is entrusting elected representatives to govern in the best interests of all citizens. We may not agree on how, but we trust the greater good is the guiding principle.
Compromise is also foundational to democracy. If the best interests of all are the benchmark, compromise is a requirement. You know walking in you won’t get everything you want, but you’ll get enough to keep society functioning & peaceful.
Cooperation is required. Conflict is a part of politics and pluralism only aggravates the potential for conflict. So agreeing to ultimately cooperate for the good of all is essential.
Rule of Law is an extension of cooperation. We must all agree that the rule of law is paramount to ensure peace and stability. The laws apply to all equally. And we agree to uphold the laws to ensure reliability and consistency to all citizens. This reduces conflict.
Political Agency is afforded to every individual. Not just those who qualify to vote. Every resident of Canada, regardless of age, gender, race or sexuality has the ability to voice opinions, call for political action and seek to have their individual and community’s needs met.
Fairness is required for democracy. Inequities, hierarchies, special privileges, inconsistency in rule of law, all put pressure on a society. Reducing those pressures are conducive to strong democratic norms being adopted. Increasing pressures reduces commitment to democracy.
Facts are required for democracy. Democracy cannot function if reality is not established.
We can disagree on how to address reality, but if we don’t agree on what is fact and what is fiction, democracy is impossible to be established.
Concession to decision making is required to achieve democracy. Every political group (political party, special interest group, lobbyist, community) must agree to concede when a decision is made. Society can’t function if decisions aren’t made. All must respect final decisions.
Consideration is also a required element of democracy. Unless all individuals, groups and special interests acknowledge and tolerate plurality, democracy cannot be achieved.
Political Dissent is a crucial element to establish democracy. The ability to provide feedback to decisions made by govt is essential. But there are defined limits to methods of dissent. Obstruction isn’t dissent, it’s impeding a decision. Dissent is persuasion not coercion.
If these elements are observed and supported by the citizenry and elected leaders, a democratic society exists. In the absence of any one or more, it is a variation of autocracy.
So it’s always a curiosity to me that some people argue that because they continue to believe in democracy, that makes our province or nation democratic.
But that’s not how democracy works.
If the people in power don’t explicitly support democracy, it no longer exists.
Regardless of your personal beliefs and values, the absence of democratic beliefs by leadership negates any belief the citizenry has.
You cannot continue to call dictatorial leadership democratic. Well you can, but that is called deluded thinking. Refusing to accept reality.
And that is Alberta’s current situation.
UCP has destroyed trust, refused to compromise or cooperate with opposition, mocked rule of law and political agency, eliminated fairness and facts, refused to concede to public pressure, rejected plurality, & tried to eliminate dissent.
You’re deluded if you continue to believe Alberta continues to be a democracy. The party elected has attacked democracy on every front. Alberta has significantly shifted to autocratic governance.
Examine your own beliefs and stop trying to define your own reality.
Accusing liberals of being communists was the common far right distraction from noticing efforts to install the same surveillance systems authoritarian nations have installed since roughly 2018.
When was Huawei CFO Meng Wenzhou arrested and held in Canada?
December 2018.
Western Society is being kettled by multiple authoritarian regimes whose ambitions include elimination of the public square, the death of liberal democracy and “peace” sustained through THOUGHT REFORM.
In other words, China is imposing its SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM globally.
I’m amplifying this again since Danielle Smith has openly defied Canadian federalism to promote the interests of land lease owners to profit from O&G resource development.
Bear in mind, Canada subsidizes American producers & American consumers of refined Oil Sands.
It’s Albertans and Canadians taking a financial hit, not the US. Royalties are at an all time low and the owners of the resources continue to lose out on profits from the sale of Oil to US companies.
Danielle Smith is unequivocally stating she refuses to adjust that arrangement.
Smith is not working for Albertans or Canadians.
Her statements and policy positions, including refusal to apply Canadian tariffs on raw product shipped to US for refining in retaliation for US tariffs on all Canadian exports.
Traitors already sold out Canada over a decade ago. It’s why they want back in power so bad.
Enough to perform multiple coup attempts. Like 2022 convoy and 2025 convoy and threat from Trump. Also arranged for multiple provincial takeovers by con politicians loyal to the agenda.
Why has the effort been to remove PMJT? To assassinate his character? To link him to multiple false scandals disproving his progressive credentials?
To discredit him so they can take over and rip apart Canada.
Why is Danielle Smith leader of Alberta?
Because this plan has existed since at least 2012 when she ran as leader of the Wildrose Party. Remember, when unable to oust the conservatives, she crossed the floor to takeover Alberta Progressive Conservative Party from within.
As we have all been coping with the news that PMJT has stepped down, JCCF has been ramping up their efforts to perform a coup.
These people are relentless in their pursuit of power & their demand for all Canadians to be forced to live under their interpretation of biblical law.
John Carpay should be in prison as far as I’m concerned. Not for these shenanigans. For putting surveillance on a chief judge who was presiding over his court case.
But this takes the cake! Trying to reverse prorogation of parliament? WTF!
These are bold moves by such idiots.
When people light fires to force firemen to put out the fire, we call that ARSON.
What do we call it when a group of religious fundamentalists attack the constitution, our judiciary and duly elected officials? An attempted coup d’état.
@Danni79021355 @KekwayB @JohnnyRickman14 Some of those documents were 5 Eyes top secret info. Additionally, some documents were military assessments of defence weaknesses of US allies. Canada is an ally of the US.
Now do the math. Create the timeline. It becomes more obvious when you do.
@Danni79021355 @KekwayB @JohnnyRickman14 J6 was 2021. The second failed impeachment conviction distracted many while Trump vacated the White House.
Trump had possession of stolen files from at very least January 2021.
Trump has recently flagged the Canadian/American border as a weakness. He’s threatening to annex us.
@Danni79021355 @KekwayB @JohnnyRickman14 What occurred in February 2022 in Ottawa and at major border points of entry across Canada? Convoy occupation of Ottawa and border barricades.
Who were the main funders of those events as evidenced by leaked donation records?
It’s the tribalisation of liberal supporters from within.
That thread within a thread clearly demonstrates camps forming before your eyes. One supports PMJT and the other supports Freeland. Both using principles to delineate lines in the sand which must not be crossed.
Can’t help but notice it’s two middle income, high status white men making a principled stand, demanding liberal voters pick their allegiances and support them. One is a principled centrist, the other is a principled centre left progressive.