Gone are the norms for decorum and political process. Swept away by constant bloviating, obstructionism, open disrespect, disinformation and personal smears.
While politics has always been fraught with conflict, generally reality wasn’t debated or created through discourse.
Democracy is a tricky concept to define. A few believe it’s limited to free and fair voting. Voting makes up a tangible part of democracy, but overall, democracy is a belief system. So it’s abstract in nature and difficult to fit into a narrow universal definition.
Democracy can be interpreted several ways by people with vast differences in ideology & values. And that ability to shift the meaning of democracy to reflect ideological belief systems always makes defining democracy tricky.
But in Canada, the definition was stable for decades.
That is until support for conservatism began to wane.
Canada started off as a conservative offshoot of the British Empire. Staunch, rigid, Eurocentric, and categorically British in nature.
Over time, the cultural zeitgeist became more liberal, humanist, moderate.
After WW2, Canada was defined by its banality, politeness, explicit humanism and its hodgepodge social safety net.
Known as the globe’s peacekeepers and for our conciliatory and moderate nature.
Who knew this branding was objectionable to the conservative far right?
There have been Prime Ministers that have redefined Canadian culture. Many would say for the better. Lester Pearson & Pierre Trudeau come to mind. They shared a vision of Canada that was a democratically robust, pluralist, mosaic of people with shared citizenship & human rights.
Democracy in Canada was defined by mid 20th century Liberals. Secular, with freedom for all faiths. Principled, with flexibility to adapt to modern needs and pressures. Stable, with defined rights and freedoms to encourage individuals & communities affirm their values & beliefs.
This was the Canada I grew up in and knew, loved and appreciated. For all its warts of past errors in judgement, Canada became almost an ideal. A refuge for all and a safe stable democracy to work towards social equality and democratic ideals.
But what were those ideals. What was the democracy Canada offered?
Intangible and abstract, we took them for granted and they are now under severe threat.
Democracy is fragile. It’s a narrow set of beliefs and behaviours that reflect those beliefs.
Trust is crucial to democracy. There’s no democracy if there’s no trust between citizens & leaders.
Democracy is entrusting elected representatives to govern in the best interests of all citizens. We may not agree on how, but we trust the greater good is the guiding principle.
Compromise is also foundational to democracy. If the best interests of all are the benchmark, compromise is a requirement. You know walking in you won’t get everything you want, but you’ll get enough to keep society functioning & peaceful.
Cooperation is required. Conflict is a part of politics and pluralism only aggravates the potential for conflict. So agreeing to ultimately cooperate for the good of all is essential.
Rule of Law is an extension of cooperation. We must all agree that the rule of law is paramount to ensure peace and stability. The laws apply to all equally. And we agree to uphold the laws to ensure reliability and consistency to all citizens. This reduces conflict.
Political Agency is afforded to every individual. Not just those who qualify to vote. Every resident of Canada, regardless of age, gender, race or sexuality has the ability to voice opinions, call for political action and seek to have their individual and community’s needs met.
Fairness is required for democracy. Inequities, hierarchies, special privileges, inconsistency in rule of law, all put pressure on a society. Reducing those pressures are conducive to strong democratic norms being adopted. Increasing pressures reduces commitment to democracy.
Facts are required for democracy. Democracy cannot function if reality is not established.
We can disagree on how to address reality, but if we don’t agree on what is fact and what is fiction, democracy is impossible to be established.
Concession to decision making is required to achieve democracy. Every political group (political party, special interest group, lobbyist, community) must agree to concede when a decision is made. Society can’t function if decisions aren’t made. All must respect final decisions.
Consideration is also a required element of democracy. Unless all individuals, groups and special interests acknowledge and tolerate plurality, democracy cannot be achieved.
Political Dissent is a crucial element to establish democracy. The ability to provide feedback to decisions made by govt is essential. But there are defined limits to methods of dissent. Obstruction isn’t dissent, it’s impeding a decision. Dissent is persuasion not coercion.
If these elements are observed and supported by the citizenry and elected leaders, a democratic society exists. In the absence of any one or more, it is a variation of autocracy.
So it’s always a curiosity to me that some people argue that because they continue to believe in democracy, that makes our province or nation democratic.
But that’s not how democracy works.
If the people in power don’t explicitly support democracy, it no longer exists.
Regardless of your personal beliefs and values, the absence of democratic beliefs by leadership negates any belief the citizenry has.
You cannot continue to call dictatorial leadership democratic. Well you can, but that is called deluded thinking. Refusing to accept reality.
And that is Alberta’s current situation.
UCP has destroyed trust, refused to compromise or cooperate with opposition, mocked rule of law and political agency, eliminated fairness and facts, refused to concede to public pressure, rejected plurality, & tried to eliminate dissent.
You’re deluded if you continue to believe Alberta continues to be a democracy. The party elected has attacked democracy on every front. Alberta has significantly shifted to autocratic governance.
Examine your own beliefs and stop trying to define your own reality.
This is why liberals and lefties should stop pointing fingers. The left is not very good at it. But the right excels at double standards and hypocrisy.
Yesterday, PMJT revealed that CPC is led by a man courting white supremacists.
But today, people are repeating the word “whacko” in relation to the PM and BC drug policy and debating whose leader was more ethical.
No one is discussing white supremacy being given legitimacy by PP this past weekend.
Who gives a crap about decorum & process in QP?
Apparently it’s more important to focus on the process and decorum than the fact the attack on the Speaker was a coordinated event by CPC & perfectly demonstrates that CPC IS courting white supremacists and attacking the first Canadian black Speaker for doing his job.
Weak leadership of Nicholas II & an uninterrupted feudal system were inadequate to provide for the whims of the elite and the sustenance of the poor. He became untenable in an time when rigid social status was being challenged by liberalism.
Marxism is a 19th century Enlightenment influenced theory of social organization and economics that is an ideal, not reality. For all the effort Marx made to emphasize his ideas be brought to fruition through revolution, the public often confuses Marxism with anarchism.
Our social and political systems legitimize devaluation of the poor, PWD, seniors and children because they do not produce profits, rather they consume resources.
Society would need to reconsider the premise of its systemic foundations to alter this reality.
The premise that most human beings are just capital that can either produce or consume goods and services became reality at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. A product of feudalist social strata.
Why people fail to recognize these beliefs is unknown, they surround us.
It’s the same strategy that was used for Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplements for citizens over age 65.
Benefits for seniors is actually the province’s jurisdiction as listed in the BNA 1867.
After industrialization in Canada and people began moving to cities and towns, seniors were dying in abject poverty. So the feds stepped in. But not without some constitutional manoeuvring first.
People forget, retirement is a 20th century concept.
Cascading series of failures means individuals are unable to address all the problems. Frankly, I’d be surprised if people were aware of all the failures occurring simultaneously.
This is a strategy.
Multiple serious problems means the electorate is divided in attention.
Some will focus on strip mining at headwaters for most of Alberta’s fresh water supply.
Some will focus on drought and access to water.
Some will focus on NICU imminent collapse.
What few will do because these catastrophic failures are emotionally overwhelming on their own, is to recognize there is one source for all of these problems.
No, it’s not Danielle Smith. She’s just a figurehead.
I always remember Art Finkelstein was a man of Jewish descent who manipulated voter perception ruthlessly to elect some very antisemitic people. Because it made him wealthy and in high demand by the far right.