Liverpool publish 2020 results: Headlines
Revenue down 8% to £490m
Wages up 5% to £326m
Net transfer spend zero
Net debt (borrowings less cash) up £28m to £119m #LFC
Overall revenue down but only goes to 31 May and includes 31 PL matches, which will bounce back in 2020/21 as more broadcast income from more matches #LFC still 2nd highest revenues in PL
Matchday income down due to closed stadium and lockdown. Would have been a record amount had it not been for Covid. LFC have 31 May year end, some other clubs have 30 June or 31 July so squeezed in more matches.
Broadcast income took a 23% hit but will be much higher in 2020/21 due to more live matches. Still 3rd highest in LFC history though & top for PL last season
Commercial income up 16% on back of bonuses from sponsors. Potentially can rise again if Nike deal generates higher sales volume.
Biggest cost for clubs is wages, up 5%, but if you win trophies you have to pay trophy bonuses. #LFC
Liverpool ave weekly wage now exceeds £150k but wages still only two thirds of income.
The other player related cost is amortisation (transfer fees spread over contract life). Liverpool's amortisation cost fell by £5m reflecting a quiet year in the transfer market and so relatively low by G6 standards.
Combination of Covid related lower income & higher costs meant that Liverpool had first loss from day to day activities since 2016. FSG approach is to break even on operations & make profit from player sales.
Liverpool have had significant profits from player sales in recent years following departure of Coutinho, Sterling & Suarez, as well as being Bournemouth's feeder club for a short period. 2019/20 was more modest with just £27m.
Liverpool do have some borrowings but some is from FSG. Interest costs are a relatively benign £3m. Much lower than when the clowns were in charge.
After taking into account player sales and interest Liverpool made a £46m loss before tax. Still modest by PL standards but poor by their own, although once again Covid has distorted the numbers.
Liverpool player signings lowest since 2012. Matched by sales.
Liverpool did increase their cash balance at the year end but this was linked to the club borrowing money too.
Auditors report not a barrel of chuckles for Liverpool but can’t see FSG turning off financial support.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bristol City publish 23/24 accounts: 🔑figs:
⚽️Revenue £42.4m ⬆️16% despite only covering 12 months instead of 13 in 22/23
⚽️Wages £34.9m ⬇️3%
⚽️Underlying losses £22.5m ⬇️20%
⚽️Player sale profits £21.7m ⬆️128%
⚽️Player purchases £3.7m
⚽️Player sales £21.7m
⚽️Total losses over the years £224m
⚽️Total Steve Lansdown investment £282.4m
Development at Ashton Gate has been a big driver of ⬆️revenue at Bristol City, with commercial income now 60% of total. This means that City generate more revenue than any other non-parachute payment club. (Most figures are for 2023, except for the clubs that have not published 2024 such as #BCFC, and Reading, who have a rogue owner who thinks the law does not apply to him).
Main costs for clubs are player related. Staff numbers slightly ⬆️but wage bill ⬇️ due to only 12 months period. Average weekly wage of £16K very competitive for a non-parachute team but wages continue to fall as a proportion of income. Other player related cost is amortisation (player transfers spread over contract life) and this is mid table by divisional standards.
Hull City publish 23/24 accounts: 🔑figures
⚽️Revenue £21.2m ⬆️17%
⚽️ Wages £29.6m ⬆️25%
⚽️Average weekly wage £13,700
⚽️Underlying losses £26.4m ⬆️28%
⚽️ Player sale profits £8.3m ⬇️45%
⚽️Player purchases £8.5m
⚽️Player sales £10.4m (plus £30m post season)
⚽️Loans from owner in year £27.9m
Revenue fairly evenly split, rise in year mainly due to better commercial sales and slight rises in matchday and new EFL TV deal. Only a handful of clubs have submitted 23/24 accounts, Reading's owner thinks the laws of the land do not apply to him so has not yet submitted 22/23
Main costs for clubs are player related. Substantial increase in wages and amortisation (player signings spread over contract length) as new owner invested heavily in playing talent resulting in Hull being at top end of non parachute payers.
A history of Premier League transfer spending. First season (1992/93) total spend was £65m and QPR spent just £197k. Newly promoted Blackburn were the biggest spenders due to Jack Walker's investment in the likes of Alan Shearer, Stuart Ripley, Kevin Gallagher & Graham Le Saux.
1993/94 spending up to £78m. Blackburn continue to be the biggest spenders, Champions Manchester United were outspent by...err...Swindon.
First £100m spend season, Everton became the first team to eight figures spent in a season with Ferguson, Samways, Amokachi and Barrett all joining the club on big deals. QPR again smallest spenders. Man City and Chelsea outspent by Wimbledon.
Chelsea FC Holdings submit 22/23 accounts. 🔑 figs
⚽️Revenue £512m ⬆️ 6%
⚽️Wages £404m ⬆️ 18%
⚽️Player costs (wages & amortisation) £119 for every £100 of revenue
⚽️Day to day losses £249m
⚽️Player purchases £745m
⚽️Player sales £203m
⚽️Borrowings in year £428m
Losses ⬆️ from £242m to £249m for day to day running of club but sale of hotel to another part of group, £30m of financial settlements & player sales ⬇️ this to £90m
Chelsea have cash in bank, total losses adding all the years together now £1.135 billion
Whilst #Rovers 🔑 revenue streams, matchday, broadcast & commercial all ⬆️ significantly. However general overheads ⬆️ too which meant no change to op losses. Sale of Armstrong in 21/22 halved losses
Both accounts & audit report reference that there is a material uncertainty over ability of club to trade as a going concern. Should no noted that audit report dated December 2023 & things may have improved since then
Burnley publish 22/23 accounts; 🔑 figs
Revenue £65m ⬇️ 47%
Wages £54m ⬇️ 42%
Loss pre player sales £41m
Player purchases £84m
Player sales £21m
Borrowings £101m
Big change in pre tax profit of £36m in 21/22 to a loss of £36m in 22/23. Mainly due to ⬇️ in revenue following relegation and player sale profits ⬇️ from £54m to £11m.
Burnley still have substantial cash but this due to the Club borrowing substantial amounts during the year as liabilities ⬆️. Burnley still profitable over the years.