Hello from Judge Chris Cooper's virtual courtroom, where arguments are starting soon on Richard Barnett's motion for release — he's the one who told reporters he left Pelosi a note that said, "Nancy, Bigo was here, you bitch" (looks like "bitch" was misspelled on the actual note)
Barnett lost the last time he tried to argue for release in January, with Chief Judge Howell saying that his "entitled behavior ... shows a total disregard for the law": buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
He's arguing the legal landscape is very different now, given rulings in other cases
If you'd like to listen to the hearing in Barnett's case, here's the public dial-in info for the court, it's before Judge Cooper: dcd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-emerg…
AUSA Mary Dohrmann says she's started having plea talks with Richard Barnett, but hasn't formally extended a plea offer yet. Barnett is facing an est'd sentencing guidelines range of 70-87 mos (not counting any credits for things like accepting responsibility)
Judge Cooper begins by saying he was "confused" about Barnett's release motion connecting Jan. 6 to the George Floyd/Black Lives Matter protests. "Clear that up for me," he says to Barnett's lawyer Joseph McBride
McBride says they brought up BLM to show that 2020, leading up to Jan. 6, was full of lots of protests, and to highlight examples of cases where people arrested at other demonstrations that involved violence were granted release. Cooper indicates he doesn't see the relevance
A key part of Barnett's case and the scope of charges is that he was carrying a walking stick stun gun at the Capitol. McBride claims Barnett took the batteries out so it wasn't operational, and Cooper presses him about how he knows that's a fact (feds never found the stun gun)
McBride argues the exhibits presented by the govt don't show lights on that would indicate the stun gun was on and powered up on Jan. 6. The govt has called this line of argument "self-serving" and "pure fiction"
Cooper asks about govt's evidence of Barnett's participation in demonstrations associated with QAnon where he was armed. McBride says he was engaging in constitutionally protected activity. Cooper pushes back, saying that can be true but it also can be relevant to community risk
AUSA Dohrmann is arguing that Barnett is different from Munchel (who was released after appealing to the DC Circuit) because:
- "aggressively" confronted law enforcement carrying stun gun
- phone is missing = evidence of concealment
- left disturbing note for Pelosi
- QAnon ties
Cooper is taking a short recess and then will announce his decision. Tone-wise, he sounded pretty skeptical of the presentation from Barnett's lawyer that enough has changed since Jan to merit release (always with the caveat that covering audio-only hearings has limits!)
But Cooper also had to press the AUSA to address the DC Circuit's opinion in Munchel, saying there didn't seem to be "a whole lot of daylight" between the two cases
Cooper's back and not mincing words: "The notion that the events of Jan. 6 were a legitimate or excusable social protest against ruling elites or worse yet a reaction to some people in society feeling that they have been unfairly scapegoated for racism is, in a word, absurd."
Cooper is still going through the factors re: detention and hasn't announced his ruling yet — he just began by making clear that he was very unimpressed by Barnett's invocation of the George Floyd/BLM protests and connecting those to what happened on Jan. 6
Now: Judge Cooper will release Richard Barnett to home detention, indicating that he found the facts and circumstances concerning, but ultimately concluded that Barnett's case was too similar to the Munchel case to warrant keeping him in jail pending trial
Cooper ends with something of a warning to Barnett, saying his ruling granting release is not an indication of what he'll do at sentencing if Barnett pleads guilty or goes to trial and is convicted. "Consider this a test, okay?" Barnett thanks the judge.
Story: The man photographed with his foot on Nancy Pelosi’s desk during the Capitol riots will be released from jail — it's the latest setback for prosecutors since the DC Circuit raised the bar for pretrial detention in these cases buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Three months ago, a judge ordered Richard Barnett — the man photographed smiling and with his foot up in Nancy Pelosi's office on Jan. 6 — to stay in jail pending trial.
Hello from Judge Thomas Hogan's virtual courtroom, where arguments are set to begin shortly on release motions filed by the two men charged with conspiring to assault Officer Sicknick at the Capitol, Julian Khater and George Tanios.
If you'd like to listen in to the Khater/Tanios detention hearing, here are the court's public lines, it's before Judge Hogan: dcd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-emerg…
Khater's lawyer Joseph Tacopina goes first, reiterates the argument from his brief that what Khater is accused of — spraying pepper spray at police — was a "limited and isolated" act, and contends he's unlike other rioters who crossed police barriers and went into the Capitol
Judge Lamberth writes that Fairlamb fits the profile of a Jan. 6 defendant warranting detention that the DC Circuit had in mind when it wrote the Munchel opinion, which set the bar higher for pretrial detention for people not charged with specific acts of violence
Lamberth also not buying a "puffery" arg re: Fairlamb's pre-Jan. 6 social media posts.
"He said it was time to 'put up or shut up' and then he, as promised, put up, assaulting a police officer. When a person follows through on a threat, his words cannot be taken as hyperbolic."
It's been more than a decade since SCOTUS ruled in a major gun rights case. Last year, the court's conservatives signaled that they thought it was time to revisit the scope of 2nd Amendment rights buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Kavanaugh wrote in April 2020 that he shared Alito's "concern that some federal and state courts may not be properly applying Heller and McDonald" (the last big 2A cases SCOTUS decided, which struck down handgun bans and reinforced gun rights in the home) buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
What about the court's newest member? In a 7th Circuit case about state laws banning people convicted of most felony crimes from possessing a firearm, then-Judge (now Justice) Amy Coney Barrett warned about treating the 2nd Amend. as a "second-class right" buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Busy week for the DOJ Civil Rights Division: One day after the announcement of a probe into the Minneapolis Police Dept., the govt has filed a statement of interest in a case about the constitutional rights of transgender persons in prison assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2068…
Biden pledged during the campaign to return to the Obama-era version:
@dominicholden DOJ's latest filing is about the Georgia Department of Corrections, not federal prison facilities. The brief notes that there's an open DOJ investigation into the treatment of LGBT people housed in the GDC that launched in 2016 (justice.gov/crt/special-li…)
This is the first I've seen of DOJ bumping up the estimate for how many prosecutions to expect re: Jan. 6 and updating boilerplate language in motions to delay deadlines. Previously it was 300+ charged with at least 100 to go, now it's 400+ charged with at least 100 to go
Note the rest of the language that DOJ has used in these continuance motions stayed the same in terms of giving the court a sense of the resources expended so far in the investigation (search warrants, hours of footage, tips, etc.)
An est'd 800 people went inside the Capitol, and many others were on the grounds with varying degrees of interaction w/ law enforcement. As Ryan notes, there's a known universe of people who haven't been identified/arrested but have been flagged by the FBI
A judge is hearing args now on Capitol riot def. Michael Curzio's request for release. It's an unusual situation — he's charged with misdemeanors only, but the govt is arguing for detention given his crim history (attempted 1st degree murder conviction) + white supremacist ties
Prosecutors argue that because he was wearing a "Thor's hammer" pendant when he was arrested, that's proof of ongoing white supremacist ties (see excerpt above). Curzio disputes that, saying that he practices Odinism and has disassociated from the prison gang he'd been part of
Curzio asks to speak directly to the judge to explain what Odinism is (it's very unusual to hear from defendants at detention hearings, but his lawyer let's him go for it) — he says he got really into Norse mythology some years ago, reads the poetry and studies "the runes"