Atomsk's Sanakan Profile picture
Apr 28, 2021 26 tweets 19 min read Read on X
1/Y

Many criticized the article below co-authored by Jay Bhattacharya, who also co-wrote the Great Barrington Declaration.

But I haven't seen a detailed explanation of why the article was wrong + dangerous. So I'll give one here



theprint.in/opinion/majori…
3/Y

Imagine the spread of SARS-CoV-2 as an accelerating car.

Some brakes help slow the car, such as masks, social distancing, contract tracing, etc.

But even without brakes, the car will eventually start slowing down on its own; that's herd immunity.

4/Y

Once you have enough people immune to infection at herd immunity (whether immune by prior infection or vaccination), you can stop using the brakes and the car still won't accelerate.

Bad idea to release the brakes too early without herd immunity.

5/Y

Bhattacharya doesn't like various brakes for ideological reasons (there's a reason he goes to right-wing outlets a lot).

So he exaggerated how close India was to herd immunity.

"a near majority of the population has developed immunity to the virus"
theprint.in/opinion/majori…
6/Y

That's consistent with Bhattacharya exaggerating the number of infections for over a year.
It's convenient for him in a number of ways, such as allowing him to give COVID-19 fatality rates so low they're impossible.



archive.is/QLmJt#selectio…
7/Y

Bhattacharya accepts models when they're convenient for his ideology, + ditches them otherwise. He mixed that with his usual bad extrapolations from non-representative samples.

Anyway, India was nowhere near ~50% of their population being infected.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
8/Y

So the car is facing the edge of the cliff.

Bhattacharya (falsely) tells the driver they are very close to not needing the brakes anymore to slow down the car.

What could be worse than that?

Well... Bhattacharya telling them brakes don't work. 🤦‍♂️

theprint.in/opinion/majori…
9/Y

I'm not going to rehash the reasons why limiting people being near each other limits transmission of a virus that spreads by people being near each other.

Not like Bhattacharya + his fans will learn at this point anyway.


10/Y

One of Bhattacharya's proposed solutions is to reserve vaccinations for people who were not infected before.

That would be an interesting point,... except that he can't help but add to that his distortions of immunology and vaccines.

theprint.in/opinion/majori…
11/Y

There's good reason to think that vaccines will work better than "natural" infection with SARS-CoV-2.

There's also a chance they may improve the immune response of those previously infected.

There are other issues as well.



12/Y

For herd immunity, we want antibodies + B cells / plasma cells that prevent re-infection; i.e. we want neutralizing antibodies that cause sterilizing immunity.

(If any non-expert says, "but T cells!!" to you, ignore them
)

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
13/Y

Unfortunately:

- not all antibodies are neutralizing
- neutralizing antibodies can wane, allowing for re-infection
- SARS-CoV-2 mutations could evade antibodies, or result in a more contagious form needing more people immune for herd immunity

Etc.

14/Y

Vaccines can help with this by increasing levels of neutralizing antibodies or addressing variants (see part 11/Y).

Conversely, allowing many infections facilitates the evolution of harmful mutants.

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…


15/Y

So who in their right mind would advocate for taking off brakes to allow for many infections?

Jay Bhattacharya, and his Great Barrington Declaration group.

At this point, he's just sabotaging the brakes for India and pushing the car off the cliff.

16/Y

But if you're going to push the car off the cliff, you may want to downplay how dangerous that is.

So Bhattacharya reaches into his usual bag of tricks for doing that. For example, citing Ioannidis' work on fatality rates:



theprint.in/opinion/majori…
17/Y

But Ioannidis' poor work leads to fatality rates so impossibly low that they require more people are infected than actually exist (Bhattacharya did the same in part 6/Y).

One of the places that happens is... India.



18/Y

And of course, Bhattacharya knowingly abuses the misleading "infection survival rate" framing.

Easy to cover up how bad 600,000 deaths are by saying '99.4% survival rate', without mentioning 100 million infected.



19/Y

As the car progresses on its descent towards the cliff, Bhattacharya downplays the risk to younger people onboard.

Ioannidis' debunked + impossible work makes room for that, as does willfully ignoring better studies



theprint.in/opinion/majori…
20/Y

Bhattacharya also downplays the risk of sabotaging brakes, by side-stepping how India + other nations under-estimate their number of COVID-19 deaths.

bmj.com/content/372/bm…

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
github.com/akarlinsky/wor…



theprint.in/opinion/majori…
21/Y

The "brakes / cliff" analogy might offend some.

I no longer care. 🙂

I value the feelings of deniers like Bhattacharya less than the lives they put at risk.



Red circle is when Bhattacharya's India article was published:

ourworldindata.org/explorers/coro…
22/Y

On vaccinating infected people (see part 10/Y):

- vaccines help infected folks
- other priorities, like vaccinating the elderly + those in regular contact with the infected (ex: healthcare staff)
- risk of doses expiring waiting to find non-infected
23/Y

And Bhattacharya's January 2021 article was in line with horrible advice he's given to India *for months.*

For example, before there was a vaccine he advocated for herd immunity via people getting infected.



July 30, 2020:
techpolicyinstitute.org/2020/07/30/jay…
24/Y

Yet Bhattacharya + his Great Barrington Declaration team refuse to admit to they were wrong.

That's in contrast to those with integrity like Monica Gandhi, who apologized for what she said on India + herd immunity.

😡



25/Y

The results in 7/Y showing ~24% infected, were out by February 4.
I re-tweeted them on February 10.

So if Bhattacharya bothered to pay attention, he had weeks to correct his dangerous mistake + warn people.

Yet he didn't.



26/Y

So hopefully this thread explained some reasons why so many experts were rightly upset with Jay Bhattacharya.

He's been ludicrously irresponsible during this pandemic.






• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Atomsk's Sanakan

Atomsk's Sanakan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AtomsksSanakan

Dec 14
@hausfath Within the uncertainty range of IPCC 1990 First Assessment Report's 1990-2025 projection.

x.com/grok/status/19…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

"predicted rise from 1990 (to 2030) of 0.7–1.5 °C with a best estimate of 1.1 °C"
nature.com/articles/nclim…

page xxii
web.archive.org/web/2019031407… Image
@hausfath 1990-2025 warming trend is ~0.25°C/decade.

psl.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/data/a…

Implies ~0.9°C of global warming for 1990-2025, i.e. close to the projected average value of 1°C.

48:40 - 55:02 :
youtube.com/watch?v=C-gdab…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

The red arrow is 1990:
climate.metoffice.cloud/current_warmin… Image
@hausfath Still end up with ~0.25°C/decade when starting in 1995 to avoid cooling from the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption.

"1993 was the low point of the post-Pinatubo cooling"
wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/15/mat…

x.com/mattwridley/st…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

psl.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/data/a… Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 7
1/F

Dr. Anthony Fauci complained about death threats to him, his family, public health experts + staff, etc.

This thread will cover some of the rhetoric that may have contributed to that, along with surrounding context.

1:43:53 - 1:47:40 :
2/F

Fauci is not alone in receiving threats.

For example, there's Dr. Nicole Kleinstreuer:

"Death threats to NIH official spark debate over aggressive campaign to end animal research"
science.org/content/articl…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

theguardian.com/us-news/articl… Image
3/F

Threats sometimes lead to physical harm.

"of 510 researchers who had published on SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19, 38% acknowledged harassment ranging from personal insults to threats of violence"
journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jv…

doi.org/10.1016/j.puhi…

pbs.org/newshour/natio… Image
Read 21 tweets
Nov 7
1/M

The most secure position in science is one that's both:

1) supported by an evidence-based scientific consensus
2) disputed by Matt Ridley [@mattwridley]

This thread will provide some examples.

x.com/mattwridley/st…
x.com/mattwridley/st…

archive.is/zpiYp Image
2/M

Ridley shows how one can get away with being wrong on topic after topic, as long one states the paranoid ideological narrative many conspiracy theorists want to hear.

Others made this point, such as Dave Farina.

pubpeer.com/publications/D…

youtube.com/watch?v=C-gdab…
3/M

So on to the secure positions that are:
1) supported by an evidence-based scientific consensus
2) disputed by Matt Ridley [@mattwridley]

There's an ongoing multidecadal global warming trend of ~0.3°C/decade.

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
Read 51 tweets
Sep 14
@curryja If it's anything like Steven Koonin's 2014 op-ed in WSJ, then it's filled with ideologically-motivated misinformation and denialism.

archive.is/FTvi1

realclimate.org/index.php/arch…
realclimate.org/index.php/arch…

web.archive.org/web/2014121322…
[archive.is/v03kY] Image
@curryja About 30% more warming occurred during the first quarter of the 21st century than during the last quarter of the 20th century.

Models did fine.

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
realclimate.org/index.php/clim…
x.com/hausfath/statu…

web.archive.org/web/2014121322… Image
Read 8 tweets
May 19
@grok @19joho @WSJopinion @mattwridley x.com/curryja/status…
x.com/curryja/status…

Ryan Maue:
"Use ERA5 or JRA-55"
archive.is/tAbpF#selectio…

archive.is/zsZIh#selectio…

"[...] according to ERA5 [...].
The increase for the last thirty years, from 1995 to 2024, is 0.26 ± 0.05°C per decade."
climate.copernicus.eu/climate-indica… Image
@grok @19joho @WSJopinion @mattwridley @grok Ridley predicted less than 0.5°C of warming.

"Matt Ridley's 2014 prediction that global warming from 1995 to 2025 would be about 0.5°C"
x.com/grok/status/19…

wsj.com/articles/matt-…
[archive.is/32FiP#selectio…] Image
@grok @19joho @WSJopinion @mattwridley Re: "The increase for the last thirty years, from 1995 to 2024, is 0.26 ± 0.05°C per decade"
climate.copernicus.eu/climate-indica…

Matches the ~0.3°C/decade projection Ridley attributed to climate models

"Whatever Happened to Global Warming?"
mattridley.co.uk/blog/whatever-…
[wsj.com/articles/matt-…] Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(