Some of these outlets were listed as national security threats by the @StateDept last summer. How did every single one of these adtech companies miss this?
The answer is simple: they genuinely have no fucking idea what they're doing.
Problem is, their technology is incredibly limited. In fact, it's useless against most disinformation efforts.
Second, the men running adtech co's (and in charge of dispensing your ad spend) are openly ignorant of what disinformation is.
It's like they've never cracked open a book or watched a @BostonJoan talk. 🤔
Finally, the @wfamarketers - a powerful interest group for advertisers - has never bothered to include disinformation on their list of bad things they don't want their ads on.
How are you going to keep your ads off of disinfo if you can't even figure out a definition❓
Btw, the @4As has an EXCELLENT definition of disinformation + misinformation sitting on its website.
The work has been done. We can use this. What's the hold up at @wfamarketers? How long are we out to lunch?
My gut tells me that GARM hasn't adopted this definition of disinformation because its members believe that disinformation and "fake news" is a matter of bias, opinions & free speech.
I'm sorry to say that is foolish and ignorant. They need to read a book too.
If we are going to stamp out disinformation from our ad buys, we're going to need to establish a working definition in this industry ASAP. Until then, we will be sponsoring all this by default:
Yesterday, we wrote about the adtech companies that are violating U.S. sanctions to funnel cash to Russian disinformation operatives.
But there are quite a few other tech platforms involved too.
SouthFront uses @PayPal for donations. They collect the cash under the very innocuous "Payment for information provision and analysis services."
This is all hella illegal.
SouthFront is also raising funds through @spring4creators. This means Spring is also violating U.S. sanctions to work with a Russian disinformation operation.
I’ve raised this issue privately several times with @bradberens, who has hosted Fox News on @iab panels like “The Value of News.”
I said actual news orgs don’t launch targeted harassment campaigns towards female reporters (like @BrandyZadrozny.)
I emailed @bradberens twice last month to open up a discussion on @iab’s relationship with Fox News.
I didn’t hear back. I’m not surprised. They don’t see themselves as playing a role in the harassment and physical endangerment of reporters just doing their job.
Ha, looks like I’ve been chatting tonight with one of the investors behind Gloo, the company that was selling data to the GOP under his fake leftist name “DEFUND THE POLICE.”
I was tipped off by one of my sources.
I’m guessing my source is correct because I’m blocked now.
Yeah, unfortunately @talkspace@Headspace and @betterhelp are not therapy providers — they are data brokers mining your most intimate conversations & reselling them to 3rd parties incl. advertisers.
It’s no joke: Before the 2020 elections, software co’s were helping churches identify mentally unwell & vulnerable people to recruit to into the church...and were then reselling that data to the Republican Party.
The GOP knew it could manipulate these voters more easily.
We don’t (yet) have proof of a direct link between the aforementioned services and the GOP, but given how little we know about how our personal data is used, managed and sold, I would assume it’s being used in the worst ways possible.