NEW: @GoogleAds, @RhythmOne, @OpenX, @taboola, @disqus, @sovrnholdings, @AcuityAds, @criteo, @TheTradeDesk, @xandr & @NextRoll_Inc are all violating U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the advertising industry.
branded.checkmyads.org/p/its-wild-how…
Two weeks ago, the @USTreasury announced sanctions on four outlets it had identified as Russian-backed disinformation operations.

Naturally, the first thing we did was go hunting for ads. And boy, did we find ads. Nearly every major adtech co is sending $$ straight to Russia.
This isn't just a "brand safety" issue. These adtech companies are facilitating extremely illegal transactions on behalf of their advertiser clients.

Clients like @oldspice, @saks and @nikestore.
Some of these outlets were listed as national security threats by the @StateDept last summer. How did every single one of these adtech companies miss this?

The answer is simple: they genuinely have no fucking idea what they're doing.

state.gov/wp-content/upl…
But seriously, here's why: First, they fully rely on brand safety vendors like @OracleDataCloud, @integralads & @doubleverify to filter for "unsafe" content.

Problem is, their technology is incredibly limited. In fact, it's useless against most disinformation efforts.
Second, the men running adtech co's (and in charge of dispensing your ad spend) are openly ignorant of what disinformation is.

It's like they've never cracked open a book or watched a @BostonJoan talk. 🤔
Finally, the @wfamarketers - a powerful interest group for advertisers - has never bothered to include disinformation on their list of bad things they don't want their ads on.

How are you going to keep your ads off of disinfo if you can't even figure out a definition❓
Btw, the @4As has an EXCELLENT definition of disinformation + misinformation sitting on its website.

The work has been done. We can use this. What's the hold up at @wfamarketers? How long are we out to lunch?

aaaa.org/index.php?chec…
My gut tells me that GARM hasn't adopted this definition of disinformation because its members believe that disinformation and "fake news" is a matter of bias, opinions & free speech.

I'm sorry to say that is foolish and ignorant. They need to read a book too.
If we are going to stamp out disinformation from our ad buys, we're going to need to establish a working definition in this industry ASAP. Until then, we will be sponsoring all this by default:

•COVID disinfo
•anti-vaxx disinfo
•election disinfo
•conspiracy theories
Read the full piece here, subscribe and send it to your friends at the U.S. Treasury! ❤️

branded.checkmyads.org/p/its-wild-how…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nandini Jammi

Nandini Jammi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nandoodles

29 Apr
Yesterday, we wrote about the adtech companies that are violating U.S. sanctions to funnel cash to Russian disinformation operatives.

But there are quite a few other tech platforms involved too. Image
SouthFront uses @PayPal for donations. They collect the cash under the very innocuous "Payment for information provision and analysis services."

This is all hella illegal. ImageImage
SouthFront is also raising funds through @spring4creators. This means Spring is also violating U.S. sanctions to work with a Russian disinformation operation. ImageImageImage
Read 6 tweets
31 Mar
NEW: I think I know how Steve Bannon is still collecting his ad bucks — and it's with a little help from some of the biggest ad agencies in the world.

branded.substack.com/p/steve-bannon…
Last week, I was watching War Room Pandemic (as one does) when they cut to an *unusually* high-quality commercial break.

Naturally, I tweeted about it and knowing what I know, knew that this was going to be news to some of these advertisers.
And I was right. Like clockwork, @NortonLifelock, @GoDaddy and @GoodRx all vanished from the lineup after my tweets.

This told me they didn’t place their ads themselves - their agencies did it for them.
Read 11 tweets
11 Mar
Guys, I got my hands on a secret Fox News sales deck lmao
Yes, I promise you this is real.
Rent is expensive these days, so I’m just thrilled to learn that I’m living rent-free in their heads along with @juddlegum!!!
Read 6 tweets
11 Mar
It’s not just the @nytimes that should be denouncing Tucker Carlson Tonight.

The @iab is still partnering with Fox News, lending it credibility and support — and actively encouraging advertisers to sponsor the network.
I’ve raised this issue privately several times with @bradberens, who has hosted Fox News on @iab panels like “The Value of News.”

I said actual news orgs don’t launch targeted harassment campaigns towards female reporters (like @BrandyZadrozny.)
I emailed @bradberens twice last month to open up a discussion on @iab’s relationship with Fox News.

I didn’t hear back. I’m not surprised. They don’t see themselves as playing a role in the harassment and physical endangerment of reporters just doing their job.
Read 8 tweets
9 Mar
Hi Scott Kriens! Why don’t you just post under your real name, buddy? 🙃
Ha, looks like I’ve been chatting tonight with one of the investors behind Gloo, the company that was selling data to the GOP under his fake leftist name “DEFUND THE POLICE.”

I was tipped off by one of my sources.
I’m guessing my source is correct because I’m blocked now.
Read 5 tweets
9 Mar
Yeah, unfortunately @talkspace @Headspace and @betterhelp are not therapy providers — they are data brokers mining your most intimate conversations & reselling them to 3rd parties incl. advertisers.

You should not use them under any circumstances.
It’s no joke: Before the 2020 elections, software co’s were helping churches identify mentally unwell & vulnerable people to recruit to into the church...and were then reselling that data to the Republican Party.

The GOP knew it could manipulate these voters more easily.
We don’t (yet) have proof of a direct link between the aforementioned services and the GOP, but given how little we know about how our personal data is used, managed and sold, I would assume it’s being used in the worst ways possible.

Because why not? What’s stopping them?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!