“Many residents in one of the Bay Area's most popular day-trip destinations are being told that they may need to abandon their homes as sea levels rise.” Stinson Beach is a fascinating case study in adaptation and retreat (1/x). sfgate.com/local/article/…
“Studies show that numerous homes in Stinson Beach will flood with just one foot of sea rise, an unavoidable result of human-caused climate change. Data from NOAA projects that this will likely happen in under 20 years.”
“Six years ago, residents in two of the lowest lying neighborhoods in Stinson Beach — Calles and the Sonoma-Patio — received notice from the county informing them that sea level rise would ‘have an impact on their ability to get permits for improvements on their properties.’”
"Lots of people delighted with their beach house and their one-and-a-half-minute walk to the beach all of a sudden discovered that you wouldn't be able to get a permit, for anything," resident and HOA President Mike Matthews said.
"That equates to 'can’t sell your house,' and that equates to loss of the value of it so there was an extreme reaction."
“The commission sees the loss of homes as inevitable and is advocating for a ‘managed retreat,’ meaning the homes in the low-lying areas will need to be moved or abandoned.”
“The more affluent area of Seadrift at the north end of the beach installed an expensive rock wall along the ocean. Many of the multi-million dollar homes in the Seadrift community are also based on raised foundations, unlike the housing down the beach.” (X/x)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Wallace-Wells

David Wallace-Wells Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dwallacewells

21 Apr
"For all the admirable sophistication of its targeting, there is one outstanding and all-important question: is the investment program big enough, and will it actually reduce emissions?" The great @adam_tooze gives the Biden Jobs plan a close read. (1/x) newstatesman.com/world/north-am…
"At a generous estimate, half of the $2trn to $2.7trn is devoted to tackling the climate crisis. Spreading $1trn to $1.3trn over eight years comes to around 0.5 per cent of current GDP annually. That is far short of any reasonable estimate of the investment needed."
"The Bernie Sanders camp, backed by the writer and activist Bill McKibben’s 350.org campaign, wanted $16.3trn. The Thrive Act proposal supported by groups associated with the Green New Deal is asking for $10trn, with 80 per cent focused on the climate."
Read 16 tweets
21 Apr
“The scientists call for the state to reduce its emissions nearly 80% by 2030, rather than the currently mandated 40%, through what they describe as a ‘a wartime-like mobilization of resources.’ Why should the Golden State double its efforts?” (1/x) latimes.com/business/story…
“The paper rattles off a dizzying series of facts about the climate consequences already confronting Californians: 4.3 million acres burned in 2020, about 4% of the state... “
“... Nearly $150 billion in health and economic damages from smaller firestorms two years earlier, and conflagrations so bad experts didn’t expect to see them for another 30 years.”
Read 5 tweets
16 Apr
Yesterday, I had the humbling privilege of testifying before the Senate Budget Committee on the cost of climate inaction. Recent net-zero commitments show the world finally understands the gains to be seized through decarbonization, I said. "Do we?" (1/x) budget.senate.gov/hearings/the-c…
Because a five-minute opening statement can only contain so much, I wanted to thread together some of the major points of my written testimony, which can be found here: budget.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
First, the impacts of climate change are already here and already enormous. This fact should be clear to anyone watching a television, and yet some of the present estimates are astonishing even to those of us paying close attention.
Read 75 tweets
16 Apr
“In May 2011, the government-appointed Climate Commission released its report The Critical Decade. The report’s final section warned that to keep global temperature rises to 2℃ this century, ‘the decade between now and 2020 is critical.’” (1/x) theconversation.com/failure-is-not…
“As the report noted, if greenhouse gas emissions peaked around 2011, the world’s emissions-reduction trajectory would have been easily manageable: net-zero by around 2060, and a maximum emissions reduction rate of 3.7% each year.”
“Delaying the emissions peak by only a decade would require a trebling of this task – a maximum 9% reduction each year.”
Read 6 tweets
7 Apr
"Individual actions are no panacea. After reading Nicholas’ book, I used the University of California, Berkeley’s Cool Climate Calculator to take a peek at my own carbon footprint." The great @themadstone on the limits of individual climate action. (1/x) grist.org/culture/cuttin…
"I was alarmed to discover that, at around 25 metric tons of CO2 per year, it’s 10 times higher than the 2.5 metric tons per person per year researchers say we need to reach by 2030 to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F)."
"But when I simulated doing everything I reasonably could do to reduce my footprint in the calculator, including getting rid of my car and going vegan, my footprint only shrank by 3 metric tons."
Read 4 tweets
25 Mar
“The ‘energy transition’ tag is a misnomer. Radically reducing fossil-fuel energy will represent an energy and an economic revolution.” The great ⁦@HelenHet20⁩: (1/x) engelsbergideas.com/essays/the-geo…
“When the first UN Climate Change Conference was held in Berlin in 1995, fossil fuels constituted 86 per cent of the world’s primary energy consumption. By 2019, that proportion had fallen by just two per cent.”
“In 2018, the increase in fossil fuel production was more than three times higher than the increase in renewables. The following year, the annual increase in fossil fuel energy consumption was slightly under that of renewables.”
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!