Thread by @lukerosiak

A MO school district told principals to create two sets of lesson plans: real ones, focused on topics like "privilege," and fake ones to show parents

"Prior to the pandemic you didn't send everything home or have it available... We are going old-school."

dailywire.com/news/rockwood-…

"Keep teaching! Just don’t make everything visible on Canvas. This is not being deceitful. This is just doing what you have done for years. Prior to the pandemic you didn’t send everything home or have it available. You taught in your classroom and things were peachy keen."

"Anything that could be picked apart I would suggest using this above approach… I wouldn’t throw it out, but you could just not give them access to the story.

When you get to Power Imbalances – You might remove the two examples and just go over them in class (same as above)."

The assistant superintendent who wrote the memo ordering hiding materials from parents was also an ELECTED SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER.

Parents voted for someone with not only the conflict of interest of working in schools, but who deemed parents a terrorist-style "cell" to deceive.

Rampant indoctrination came to light because of coronavirus.

But there is an interesting resolution here that other school districts could adopt. To restore trust, the district says it will continue to post classroom materials online for parents even after schools are fully open

Of course, as seen by the original incident, there's no guarantee this material would be what kids are really hearing.

But there's really no reason all schools shouldn't do this -- the technology is already there and parents are used to it.

The school district didn't quite apologize, but expressed "regret" for letting down parents, who it says are "allies" in educating "our children."