So, a thread about #CarrieAntoinette and that wallpaper.

Princess Nut Nuts, fed up of living in the tatty filth left by the previous two occupants, and unwilling to suffer the indignity of John Lewis furniture, decides to give her fiancé’s gaff a makeover.
Now, Carrie has a loose grasp on what belongs to her, as the Conservative party found out when she put in her expense claims, which is why she got the boot - oh, and she was also useless, but you knew that already. According to her friends, she has ‘exquisite taste’. I doubt that
I doubt it on the basis of the fact that she shares her life with a man who looks like he covered himself with glue then ran naked through an Oxfam shop. In any case, Carrie decides she cannot carry on living in this filth, and she needs to cover the walls with gold.
This doesn’t come cheap, but Boris is too busy doing a shit job of running the country, so he lets her do whatever the fuck she wants. And what she wants is so much bling it would make Trump hesitate. When it is pointed out to him that the taxpayers will only stump up £30K ....
... he shits himself. He can’t afford this - his £150K annual salary barely covers the maintenance for his *insert estimate here* children and his crusted port. So he comes up with a plan so mendacious that Dominic Cummings refuses to have anything to do with it.
Now, this is a shock, because I didn’t realise that was possible, unless it was actual genocide or the harvesting of baby organs. But it is indeed the case, and when Cummings refused to find donors to pay for Carrie’s follies, Boris was rather fucked.
Plan B, to establish a charitable trust to pay for it, went tits up when grown-ups explained to Boris that it would be a) impossible and b) illegal, to do so.
However, he persisted with this for quite a while until eventually the penny dropped that it wasn’t going to happen
In the meantime, Princess Nut Nuts is still merrily replacing the doorknobs with Faberge eggs or whatever one needs to do to spend north of £200K on a flat which is already in perfectly good nick. So when the bills come in, a wealthy Tory bigwig pays.
However, when it becomes evident that Boris never had any intention of paying and he’d wanted Dommo to find him some chaps to pay for it, and that they had tried and failed to create what can only be described as a bogus charity, Boris is told that it must appear that he paid it
So now we have an embattled Boris, with a £57K shaped hole in his bank account, and a forthcoming appearance by Dom at the select committee to look forward to. He will tell them what they want to know. They, in turn, can call the PM, and he can’t bluster his way through that.
So the next month will be interesting; if the Tories want to be rid of Boris, this is the time to do it, when they can bury the fucking shambles of Brexit and the catastrophe of the Pandemic, under a “Well, it’s very sad, but he had to go”
The only question remains “Who inherits?”
My guess is it won’t be Gove because the public hate him. And they hate his wife even more. I think it will come down to whatever dirt Dommo decides to ditch, as he knows where all the bodies are buried and who buried them
Once again, the short-sighted Barnard Castle Botherer is the kingmaker. Watching this all unfold is going to fill the gap which remains after Line of Duty ends.
I can’t wait.
#CarrieAntoinette
#CashForCushions
#MajorSleaze

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Her Holiness Pope Mrs Trellis, the 1st

Her Holiness Pope Mrs Trellis, the 1st Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @theonlywayisup

Aug 16, 2022
🧵 - Period Dignity Officer

Never in all my life have I read such rubbish as I have encountered today.
Jason Grant - congratulations by the way, Jason - has been appointed to implement and raise awareness of a great new law in Scotland to provide period products FOC in ...
...public settings. It's a new initiative and I wish him every possible success. It sounds as if he is going to need it, judging by the screaming hysteria and abuse he has received at the hands of the press, those women who speak shit every time you put a microphone in ....
.....front of them, and of course the GCG - the Gender Critical Gestapo - who have the shrillest voice this side of the asteroid belt.
So let's just calm the fuck down a bit, shall we?
Firstly, Jason is not there to ''mansplain'' periods - one idiotic suggestion I read today...
Read 9 tweets
Jul 21, 2022
Brexit - a thread 🧵

One of the hardest things in life is to admit that you were wrong. The more adamant you were that a course of action was the right one to take, the harder it is to admit that you went the wrong way. This is how people end up following a SatNav into a river.
One of the biggest problems is that there is an inherent streak of Rule Britannia which runs right through the UK, regardless of class, income or party allegiance. Frankly, it's a streak of racism, and we all know it. It's always been there and I truly believe it is diminishing.
However, it's still there in enough depth to give rise to UKIP and the fall of the Red Wall seats. People who wouldn't vote Tory if you had a knife to their knackers fell for the myths and believed Johnson and Brexit would 'restore' a Britain which exists only in their narrow
Read 12 tweets
Apr 14, 2022
🧵This is the question which was posed on YouGov:
“The government has proposed a deal where some people who have entered Britain and applied for asylum will be flown to Rwanda, in Africa, for their asylum applications to be processed. Do you support or oppose this proposal?”....
More people opposed the proposal than supported it, which is good, but the question implies that people would he held in Rwanda while their applications for asylum IN THE UK were being processed.

This is not the case.

If they are taken to Rwanda, they will be told to apply...
....for asylum THERE.
To me, this is open to massive legal challenges. If they are deemed, by virtue of having entered the UK via an 'unauthorised' route that the government plans to make a criminal offence, to have failed in their application for asylum in the UK, then by ....
Read 4 tweets
Apr 14, 2022
I'm trying to figure out what I just heard on the news. The correspondent said that asylum seekers taken to Rwanda would be processed by the Rwandans, and if they passed would be offered a place in Rwanda. So is that the deal? Will their application for asylum here be considered?
I may have missed something, so please fill in the blanks for me, if you can?
Okay, I found this which explains it
They plan to criminalise coming to the UK without authorisation to seek asylum.

Isn't that the whole point of claiming asylum?
Read 4 tweets
Apr 14, 2022
🧵
On the eve of further revelations about more lockdown breaches by the lardy guff monster, and further fines, the government decides to announce their latest wheeze - to send refugees to Rwanda, in the hope that they won't come back.
So is that news being released now just...
....as a distraction?
Partly, yes. But they will have seen the polling, and it's not good. So this is an all-out attempt to appeal to the former UKIP-voting section of the population responsible for fatty bum-bum being in power. I can imagine the discussions, where they planned..
....to appeal to their voter's inner Nazi, with a good old dog-whistling policy on immigration. Because that has now become the core Tory voter:
1) Thought the lockdown was bollocks, so doesn't give a fuck who breached it
2) Would rather we took in no refugees at all, so .....
Read 11 tweets
Jan 27, 2022
Around Christmas, the daily number of Covid cases and deaths in the UK was very similar to the daily number in France. Their figures for new cases have stayed very high, whereas ours have declined, although the number of deaths remain very similar. So why is this?
It's because...
........we moved the goalposts, isn't it?
We stopped requiring a follow up PCR test
We had poor availability of LFTs
We stopped testing in schools
We stopped counting repeat infections

Now, if you take the ONS data on the prevalence of Covid in the community, which is ......
.....in excess of 3 million last week, then that would equate to a daily total more like 400k, very similar to what France is declaring.
The daily figures are being massaged and deliberately under-reported by a government attempting to justify their decision to end mitigation,
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(