It’s been a hell of a decade for people accidentally creating monsters they can’t control or corral, isn’t it.
As I’ve been saying for a long time: people know exactly what the Tories are and they’re absolutely fine with it, as long as they’re getting what they want - maximum viciousness, raw spite, idiotic flag-waving, cruelty and crackdowns on people they don’t like.
Here’s the thing about the news/entertainment industry creating a monster backlash electoral bloc that only wants the dumbest, meanest, nastiest motherfucker it can get to crack the skulls of people they don’t like: you can’t make it stop if their stupidity gets your gran killed.
I think the Times in particular thought they could shitefest Johnson over the line then put him back in his box, and we’d go back to normal. But now “normal” is millions of people loving the most cretinous, cruel shit imaginable, thanks to people like the Times editorial team.
I’m sure the press really could bring Johnson down if they put their backs into it - Covid alone, Jesus Christ - but I don’t see how they can do it without basically torching the Conservative Party for a generation, and I don’t see where the cracks are you could jam a crowbar in.
It took them three years to realise the cracks in the Labour coalition were Brexity old farts and dim liberals. Even then, they were reliant on full cooperation by 40 or 50 MPs doing outright treason to the point of suicide bombing themselves, and they had to burn the house down.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Flying_Rodent

Flying_Rodent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @flying_rodent

29 Apr
Speaking as someone paid to ensure the public are kept informed on important matters that can have huge effects on their lives and prospects, I’m pleased to report they don’t give a fuck. “Why don’t you piss off back to London, briefcase boy”, they said and really I deserved it
As a professional politics journalist, it is simply awesome that the public don’t understand why rich donors funnelling money directly to the Prime Minister himself through poorly concealed payments is bad. Why, only swine would imagine the people would care.
As you get older, you start to recognise the cycle of Is this a scandal >>> Actually we’ve convinced ourselves the public loves lies and corruption >>> How did this terrible war/referendum result/public health calamity happen >>> It was our fault for being middle class >>> Repeat
Read 5 tweets
29 Apr
TBF we’d see it like that because it’s unusual in many countries for the government to stack broadcasters and public bodies with their craziest supporters, and for newspapers to employ as many current and former ruling party politicians, staff and their relatives as they can.
It’s not so unusual in Britain, where we’re in the end phase of final consolidation of that process, rather than the outset.
The most hilarious instance of this was the total death-punishable omertà on the Tories stacking the equality body with shit hacks, race weirdos and wingnut freaks, until it issued its report on the Labour Party, at which point a load of deeply critical stories suddenly emerged.
Read 4 tweets
29 Apr
I assume the point of this line of argument is to bait dipshits like me into pointing out the numerous front page headlines about serving and retired military officers threatening mutiny etc, which Dave certainly knows about but doesn’t mention. Well, here you go then.
The thing I’d note about the generals’ letter is that - if you take out the threat of civil war and replace it with dark hints about working class people turning fascist - it’s indistinguishable from the material you’d find on the Times opinion and editorial pages.
You don’t need a hypothetical for the Times telling readers Britain is menaced by a shadowy alliance of Marxist professors and minority radicals, or that liberalism has left Our Women at the mercy of Their hellish lust by not being racist enough. This already happened repeatedly.
Read 4 tweets
28 Apr
Important not because of any inherent value in the incident, but in firing the starting pistol on an incredibly ferocious media campaign of totally overt racism, xenophobia and general intolerance. The hacks took it as permission to do what they had long been straining to do.
The upsurge in pointedly brazen public racism and retail outrage this decade didn’t emerge organically from the public or from the politicians they elect. It was a media phenomenon: nurtured and unleashed by broadsheets and tabloids, which is why the Tories were blindsided by it.
When Cumberbatch/Cummings put his ear to the ground in that dumb TV show, it wasn’t a democratic uprising he could hear. It was thirteen million aging dipshits angrily repeating Sun scare stories and stupid daytime TV zingers at each other.
Read 7 tweets
28 Apr
This and active participation behind the scenes by senior Tories. That’s essential to keep it in the papers day after day. For a scandal to become a crisis, it requires the consent and full participation of the Mail, the Sun and a good chunk of the relevant political party.
There are almost no major Labour or Tory scandals in recent years without those parties’ MPs and backroom staff leaking material, giving interviews and quotes. Which means there are no scandals unless it’s in the personal interest of certain insiders for there to be a scandal.
Glaring examples include a blaring, constantly headlined racism scandal in one party, and near total silence on racism in the other. And the main reason for that was that one set of MPs couldn’t get on TV enough, while the other wouldn’t even talk off the record.
Read 6 tweets
28 Apr
All that’s left is to decide who’s playing the Ugly Sisters and who is the rear end of the cow IMO
As ever, I advise against getting wound up about double standards. It’s not that there are very stringent standards for some and none at all for others - there are just no standards worthy of the name, and when we talk about rules, we are instead describing political expediency.
Why get hung up on “You back (x) for far greater offences than the stuff you hammered (y) for” when the explanation - whatever is convenient for specific people in positions of power and influence, is always permissible - is sitting there on the rug like a fat black tarantula.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!