Maya Forstater Profile picture
Apr 30, 2021 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
People keep doing the awful, terrible thing of which I am accused....most recently Vic Parsons of Pink News misgendering Philip/Pips Bunce
They made a correction
As reported in the original judgment here are the things I said about Bunce, during a twitter discussion.

Nothing negative about Bunce's appearance at all
This is the relevant part of the Slack conversation referred to - (it is on page 404 of the "Skeleton Plus" in case of interest)

hiyamaya.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/forsta…
And this is my reply
Is it any wonder people are petrified of talking about this issue, when an ordinary conversation about whether it is appropriate to give an award for women in business to a man who wears a dress to work sometimes can get you painted as a monster who should be made unemployable?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

May 23
The @EHRC says that information about sex is "likely to constitute special category data for the purposes of the Data Protection Act and UKGDPR".

It gives no caselaw for this. Image
This means that organisations that are following the code would need revise their data protection policies and train all their staff.

Organisations like... the EHRC...

Whose own data protection policy doesn't say anything about treating sex as special category data.

equalityhumanrights.com/about-us/conta…Image
Read 11 tweets
May 13
The OfS-Sussex judgement is logically flawed and can't be allowed to stand. @ObhishekSaha with a very good analogy about paths.

Sussex's defence was that it had a high level sign saying "this path will only be closed for very good reasons". Therefore it must have had a very good reason 🙄

timeshighereducation.com/opinion/ofs-su…
I really like this footpath analogy...

In order to keep the footpath functionally open the local authority has to apply some rules to the users of the path. It has a duty to keep the path open for cyclists and pedestrians, but not for motorbikes. This is in the bye-laws

(this is the university's equality act compliant equality policy that is part of its governance)
There are some short parts of the path that are so unavoidably narrow that the local authority puts up signs saying "cyclists dismount here" to keep the whole path safe and open for all users.

That is fine, the path is still open to pedestrians and cyclists.

(that's a proportionate means to a legitimate aim in the Equality Act, its "no noisy protests that disrupt exams")
Read 5 tweets
Apr 9
This is quite the exercise in missing the point by Prof Shreya Atrey in Modern Law Review.

FWS will have a severe impact on "transgender, gender fluid, gender non-conforming, polygender, genderqueer and intersex" it says (without defining any of these terms).

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/14…Image
Remember, FWS was just about whether a GRC changes a person's sex for the purpose of the Equality Act.
Atrey says the protected characteristic of sex should be amended to include sex characteristics, gender, gender identity, gender expression and gender performance. 🤨 Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 12
A curious thing about the draft government guidance: It has no conceptual underpinning at all

“In recent years, we have seen a significant increase in the number of children who are questioning the way they feel about being a boy or a girl, including the physical attributes of their sex and the related ways in which they fit into society. “

Er ok…🤷‍♀️
It then dives into “where a child or their parent has raised a request relating to social transition”

The phrase appears 29 times in the guidance, but is never explained what it means or what it might involve.
The schools are told they must "consider what is in the best interests of the child and other children, and a decision relating to social transition may not be the same as a child’s wishes. "
Read 7 tweets
Dec 3, 2025
The judgment in the case of Maria Kelly v Leonardo is out and it is awful.

As bad as James Tayler’s judgment in Forstater v CGDE in 2019 (and just as likely to be turned over on appeal).

gov.uk/employment-tri…Image
The phrase “gender identity” appears 36 times in the judgment Image
Leonardo’s policy is that any member of staff who is proposing to to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process for the purposes of reassigning their gender can use the toilets intended for the opposite sex.

Maria complained and got nowhere. Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 1, 2025
I am hugely grateful to Naomi Cunningham for the work that she has done as the first chair of Sex Matters, and for her equally important role as a barrister representing claimants using the law to fight for justice.

I wish her all the best in her future endeavours.
There is not enough of Naomi to go around... ❤️ Image
Sex Matters board will be led by Interim Chair Dr Emma Hilton
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(