Andrew Levi Profile picture
Apr 30, 2021 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Russia & Germany - what next?

It’s a perilous moment in the internal & external development of Russia.

Few understand Russia & Germany better than Ernst-Jörg von Studnitz (below with Mikhail Gorbachev).

In a recent article he says Nordstream 2 & old thinking must go. A 🧵/1.
Published originally in German (below) in the Redoute Papers series, Ambassador von Studnitz’s article is presented in English, in this short🧵. Each page accompanied by a one-tweet summary/ commentary by me. It carries sharp messages for German & other western policy-makers. /2.
Drawing on deep historical understanding & over half a century’s experience dealing with Russia, including as German ambassador in Moscow 1995 - 2002, Dr von Studnitz examines the Germany-Russia context facing a new Chancellor in Berlin this September. Old approaches are out. /3.
None of the four approaches used over 100 years helps: Rapallo (post WW1), Ostpolitik (1970s & 80s), Helsinki (1970s onwards), Two Plus Four (1990 onwards). The last of these was a bitter defeat, a catastrophe, in President Putin’s eyes. We must wake up to current realities. /4.
Germany is constitutionally committed to a united & peaceful Europe. That goes beyond the EU. And beyond economic interests. Important though both are. Massive German economic engagement has failed in the policy objective of helping usher in a modern, European Russia. /5.
Democratic forces in Russia have proved too weak. Ambassador von Studnitz sets out how, since the Georgia invasion of 2008, at least, Russia has been in the hands of a revanchist, territorially expansive power elite whose goals are incompatible with European peace & security. /6.
Complaints about NATO’s eastward expansion are intended to deflect blame for European division from Russia to the West. Yet no one can doubt both the right & good reason for central & eastern European countries to join the western alliance. 1956 & 1968 remain in vivid memory. /7.
Germany’s economic interests can’t be allowed to trump politic essentials. Nordstream 2 serves the former & contradicts the latter. It must go. Russia depends on advanced European industry. It has no realistic China alternative. Russia’s future is in Europe. So, what next? /8.
Political robustness, framing social & economic engagement, with patience, perseverance, consistency & western unity are the essentials.

No German “Alleingang” - close alignment with the US & EU partners. No splits.

Many small steps, over many years.

If it isn’t too late. /9.
Final notes.

The original text represents Ambassador von Studnitz’s views. Errors or omissions in the translation or the Twitter 🧵 are mine.

Photo credit: German-Russian Forum.

Paper credit: Redoute Papers, Bonn.

Full disclosure: Dr von Studnitz is my father-in-law. /10. End
Correction to tweet 8: “politic” should read “political”.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Levi

Andrew Levi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewPRLevi

May 8
While understanding the surprise (it was unexpected!) at Natalie Elphicke’s defection, I’m bemused by the shock, in some quarters, that Keir Starmer welcomed her.

No, not because Sir Keir is a “Red Tory” or a “short-term opportunist”.

His grand strategy explains it.

A 🧵/1.
Starmer’s Labour is on a mission, even if some in the party don’t yet realise, to make Labour *the* party of Britain, embedding it in government for decades.

Creating a national consensus, drawing in the widest feasible span of committed supporters. /2.
The purpose is to transform the country (more on that in a moment).

“Doing an Attlee”.

But succeeding.

(Before you raise both eyebrows, consider this: what might Attlee & his colleagues have achieved if Labour had been in power a lot longer?). /3.
Read 15 tweets
May 6
Today is Holocaust Remembrance Day, date of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising.

27 January, the liberation of Auschwitz, is UN Holocaust Remembrance Day.

We remember systematic, industrial, genocidal murder.

In 2022 I shared a letter from Peter.

I’d like to do so again.

A🧵/1.
Mauthausen, 13 May 1945

Dear Fritz, Dear Barbara!

After an infinitely long time I am allowed to write to you, the still existing branch of the family – or so I hope – and to tell you the events of the last 3 years. /2.
Oma is dead. She passed away peacefully and quietly in her sleep. She had been locked up in the “Home for the Aged” of the Jewish Community in Darmstadt. Mutti was put into jail. From there whilst in transit to a concentration camp she died, of kidney trouble they said! /3.
Read 20 tweets
Apr 26
The other day I took part in a seminar organised by perhaps the world’s most famous human rights organisation.

The subject was UN efforts to end mass atrocities & the need to prevent countries blocking the UN doing so.

Something unexpected happened.

A 🧵/1.
Much of the session focused on the use of international law, & on the role of the UN Security Council, particularly its veto-wielding five permanent members, China, France, Russia, the UK & the USA. /2.
So much was perhaps predictable &, although reasonably well-informed & coming from a humane & decent place, somewhat frustrating. We all know that nothing major is likely to change on the UNSC front for years to come, if then. /3.
Read 23 tweets
Apr 11
A Study in Scarlet

The human suffering of 7 October & since renders any but sociopaths deeply distressed. We're all covered in blood. Perhaps you're now angry with me for "moral relativism" or another modern deadly sin. Reading on may not help. But I hope you will.

A long🧵/1.
The most obvious reason for distress is the carnage. Then feelings of impotence & rage. Then, for the more honestly reflective, a recognition of complicity & guilt.

There is no "clean" way out. Nor has there ever been.

Don't be angry. Be determined. And realistic. /2.
Let's start with our complicity.

To recognise that, it's unnecessary to rehearse the history of the Balfour Declaration, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the League of Nations (British) Mandate, the Holocaust, the multifaceted role of the UN & its major powers, & so on. /3.
Read 62 tweets
Oct 26, 2023
The US and us

Current world events are both highly distressing in many respects, and highly clarifying.

Whether we're in the US, of it, or neither; interested in the US or not; supportive of the US or critical - the US is indispensable, and unavoidable.

A shortish thread. /1.
When (or if ...) the US loses its leverage, anywhere significant, it spells deep trouble for us all.

If the US uses its leverage badly, we're also in deep trouble.

The UN, and the world, depend on the US using its leverage, and well. /2.
There is no credible alternative, in any foreseeable timescale. Just horrifically escalating disorder. You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

So: what do we - that’s to say, our governments, and those of our fellow citizens who have more or less influence over that - do? /3.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 13, 2023
Israel-Palestine

You’re right, of course, @McFaul.

And you know this subject well. But many who are now, rightly, taking a close interest, don’t.

So, as a former policy-maker with relevant background, I offer some thoughts for social media users.

A 🧵/1.
Image
The kinds of ultimate resolution under discussion require a few things.

I’ll start with acceptance by all of Israel’s right to exist within internationally recognised borders. (Presumably those would be, or would be no less than, the pre-1967 “six day war” borders). /2. Image
Perhaps there would be some negotiation about security zones beyond those, but I won’t assume that right now.

It would also require Palestinians giving up all claims on territory within Israel’s recognised borders. /3.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(