Sam Blatherwick Profile picture
Apr 30, 2021 19 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Factorising non-monics

I had read about doing this before factorising monics.

So I gave it a go.

Fans of #donsteward 's boxes (donsteward.blogspot.com/2019/02/boxes-…) will like this!

This is y10 set 2 aiming for grade 6/7. Some of them will do A-level.

#mathschat #mtbos #mathscpdchat ImageImage
I appreciate this is leaving nothing to chance, direct teaching. This took four lessons in total.

I was a little delayed, when, halfway through the week almost half the class got put into self-isolation and I was teaching it blended with 13 at home and 16 in the classroom.
I'd written about this approach here in theory logsandroots.wordpress.com/2020/10/11/way…

based upon a tweet by @DrStoneMaths here:

so this week has all been about putting this plan into action.
I started with skirting round what I intended to avoid; explicitly teaching monic factorisation

We multiplied some brackets out. I didn't specify a method. We noticed stuff. Some students were caught "speeding" (eg not writing out all four terms). We discussed how they did it. Image
Then worked onto a hook. These had a pattern but it wasn't so obvious. We could write down the next one in the sequence, but it wasn't as straightforward as the last to see what the coefficient of n was going to be. Image
I didn't go over the top at this point.

I wanted to highlight the importance of the four term expansion to these and we'd got that. I specifically asked for the four terms here. Four terms is important for where we are going to so they needed attention drawing to it.
We have done loads of practice at "boxes" over the year. I had been doing loads of practice because I knew in September it would come to this.

I gave them a sheet of A4. The top exercise was boxes the bottom exercise was expanding double brackets.

I forced the grid method ImageImage
Because the students' attention was drawn to the procedure they hammered their way through all of this.

Then I asked them to step back and look at the numbers.

WOAH!

What do you notice? All about the wow here!

There's a lot of hard work still to go
Worth mentioning at this point that a student had recalled the diagonals property of boxes (as we had investigated it earlier in the year) and had shared with the class that it was a v good strategy in this case where it was hard to see the ratios as well. Image
I hammered this for the rest of the week. I kept coming back to this student and saying it was his method.

I emphasised how important it was that he had remembered it.

We are doing "Student X's method" - all about the ownership.

ps I started putting product in the middle Image
Now we had made that connection I needed to put some ground work in. We started with two mini steps. One was working with algebra in boxes. The other was putting four terms into the grids.

Big variance in performance here. ImageImage
Because of the variance in performance I looked at my assessment and put some scaffolding in place here. I went back to whiteboards and did some work on both of these. Image
Students at this point were keen the emphasise how important the diagonal property was here. (as a coincidence I saw @StudyMaths using this method in a worked solution this week on another type of problem)

They put this and would explain it like this. Image
I made a point of still talking about horizontal and vertical relationships. So important to still spot those in the answer and PRAISED students who weren't following the crowd method and were seeing alternatives.

All about diversity of thought and listening to those thoughts
Then I looked at the four term problems. Some students struggled with knowing where to put the terms. So I did another expansion and then highlighted the positioning. ImageImageImage
At this point students are happily factorising these four terms and we get to the point where if they are given four terms then they can *easily* factorise it - 100% success rate.
I now go back to a theme that we have talked about before (many months ago) and we begin to explore the sum of a diagonal. Image
So we do the sum of everything, and then start to specify it with problems. Image
Then moved it onto thinking through these with algebra, before finally going for it.

I need another lesson of practice but I have confidence that this has been more successful than I've taught it in the past.

I am also much more happy with this method! ImageImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Blatherwick

Sam Blatherwick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blatherwick_sam

Jun 12, 2022
Either side of half term I've been teaching vectors to Yr 10 higher.

I wanted to put a thread together on how I scaffold the leap to vector algebra, and how vector algebra is a lovely vehicle for interleaving.

#mathschat Image
I did loads of vector thinking a couple of years ago, especially prompted by @danicquinn's #mathscpdchat in Nov 2019

We then taught vectors in y11, around the same time as translations.

Later, I moved it to y10, straight after ratio and algebra work

Before half term I did a load of work on column vectors, drawing, adding and subtracting, multiplying by scalars, seeing these visually, and also filling blanks in for the sums.

Also important for students to see the reverse vector is the negative ImageImageImageImage
Read 26 tweets
Dec 15, 2021
because of a change of scheme of work, the pandemic, the groups i've been put on... i've not taught surds for over 3 years.

***I LOVE TEACHING SURDS***

and I have got to teach it this week 🥳

(yr 11, aiming for grade 7/8) Image
my starting point with surds is always thinking about squares, but actually I had a funny coincidence with the starter sheet that lesson.

The question had a changing subject of the formula Q as below. Image
We discussed the misconception that if we rearrange to q² = p² - 4, you couldn't then square root to q = p - 2

I always pop this by showing this demonstration, but I added the following, as I'd been doing distributive property with my yr 10s Image
Read 25 tweets
Jul 2, 2021
I have been working my yr 10s hard this week on finding equations of a line from pt and gradient or two points. However, lots of my time has been spent on gradient as a concept and there is a lot of heavy lifting done by the procedures
initially students are comfortable with the idea that y=mx+c is something to do with equation of a line, but I need the key features of this to be fluent so we swot this to begin with

not sure about my spelling here!
Nice Q that came from a student here was "what if we wrote this as y = 5 - 7x?", love the opportunities that come out of student Qs

rearranging for gradient + intercept isn't something I was doing here, I'll go back to it in the Autumn as retrieval when I do changing the subject
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(