I've just posted this NFT-revenue-splitting-to-support-opensource-projects feature proposal for @hicetnunc2000 and would very much love your support/upvote or at least thoughts/consideration: hicetnunc.featureupvote.com/suggestions/18…
Isn't it ironic a 3D render, GIF, art piece made w/ open source tools not just quickly yields more income, status & higher incentive than putting in 1000s of hours working on the tooling/frameworks/community which allowed people to create & benefit from such works in 1st place?
As much as we celebrate digital art, its democratisation, diversity, free access etc. - where's the acknowledgment from the NFT crowd of the thousands of people who've been working on these creative tools used to make the hot-selling works NFT platforms are being flooded with?
If a 30sec GIF made w/ Processing (or OF, or Blender, or....) can make $1000s within a few hours, where's the incentive for people passionately working on these tools, yet struggling to make similar amounts in a year? What's wrong with our value judgement here? Is it wrong? 🤷♂️
Of course, we're now already seeing the NFT world organizing into new tribes & communities (which are real/valid) - but I'm currently having high hopes for particularly the H+N crowd (as chosen home for much the generative art glitterati) to pay more attention to these matters...
...and to be a leading light for the other platforms. To clarify, I've just started dipping my toes into this scene and as much as I can see a lot of benefits to artists/makers, I fear/sense the smell of short-lived gold rush blinding/misdirecting our long-term incentives...
Proof-of-Stake vs Proof-of-Work is just one aspect which NFT platforms can set themselves apart with, but there're many more to consider IFF (if-and-only-if) the real interest is in creating an artist-focused, rather than speculative economy...
Artist-focused also doesn't just mean NFT artists supporting each other by collecting each others pieces. If the platforms aren't curbing or at least addressing the underlying speculative nature, they WILL eventually succumb to pure speculation & all the other negatives it brings
TL;DR this isn't a hot take or subtweeting anything - just my personal view after 0.5 weeks of getting more into this exciting world and trying keep an open/critical mind...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ As follow-up to my @hicetnunc2000 revenue-split feature request: It was really great to see - at least in principle - many people are agreeing there's a need AND will/desire to support such a feature. I will try to explain my own thoughts/perspective in some more detail...
2/ For me this isn't primarily about tool makers getting a piece of the cake. It's about at least _attempting_ to provide some form of _economic feedback loop_, an incentive built into the platform(s)...
3/ ...a mechanism to provide attribution, recognition & sustainability for those groups of people who ensure that much (not ALL!) of the digital art on offer on various (not only NFT) platforms could actually be created by their respective artists in the first place!
1/ Painful realisation: The more I've learned, done & created over the years, the less I know how to even talk about it & get somewhat frustrated not being able to produce an elevator pitch for my last 10-15 years of near daily activity
trying to create...
2/ ...an alternative ecosystem of tools & concepts for creative coding. So here's a 🧵 to summarize my #PCD2021 talk a bit more: I likely missed _most_ of the key points I wanted to make on Thur, esp. the parts I didn't even get to present due to running out of time...
3/ ...with too much (time) spent on oldskool roots & anecdotes, which albeit important for larger context and maybe interesting to some, are not _that_ important in larger picture... I'm sorry!
@EmmanuelOga I was going to blog about this topic, but never seem to find the time for it. In short, I still love & use CLJ(S) for some of projects, but at the same time find TS is possibly more suited for my purposes/interests and IMHO provides a somewhat better balance overall... /1
@EmmanuelOga Some parts of thi.ng/umbrella are heavily influenced by my experience of working w/ CLJ fulltime for 5+ yrs, but adding a spin to it. Compared to CLJ, TS gives me more flexibility to break out of certain lang aspects/features when they're really not warranted/wanted /2
@EmmanuelOga Of course CLJ allows that to a large extend itself, but then quickly becomes unwieldy (YMMV). Syntax for doing relatively maths-heavy or non-standard / low-level stuff (even just using arrays vs CLJ vectors) is quite verbose & hard to read (in contrast to rest of lang). /3