A paper for SAGE released yesterday analyses hospital admissions post vaccination. Reinforcing the point that one dose does not give full protection, 400 people entered hospital and subsequently died who displayed symptoms after vaccination. 1/6 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The majority of these (72%) showed symptoms within 21 days of the jab, so probably were infected prior to the jab, or before immunity develops. However, 113 people only showed symptoms after 21 days or more (likely "vaccine failure").
2/6
You can see also that the "over 21 day" cases weren't confined to the few days after, but are spread over a longer period. (Note these graphs relate to admissions, but the point is the same.)
The decline in the green zone will be at least partly due to declining prevalence.
3/6
Note in the first two tables, those in vaccine tier 1 (CH residents) have typically been allocated to Tier 2, due to lack of information to categorise them separately.
The colouring in the previous graphs is explained here.
4/6
The paper notes the large number admitted within 7 days of vaccination, and discusses the possible reasons for that here. These include the possibility that an asymptomatic case at vaccination had symptoms triggered by the vaccine. 5/6
In total though the number admitted post vaccination are a very small percentage of the total admitted in the second wave, evidence that clearly disproves those who have suggested that the vaccination programme caused the dramatic increase we saw in December and January. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A great thread on the state pension and National Insurance.
For me, the trailed abolition of NI and thus its replacement by general taxation in terms of funding state pension benefits will have a major generational redistribution of tax.
It’s been the case that (in aggregate) at any one time the working generation funds the SPs of the retired generation above it.
2/
If the abolition of NI results in an increase (albeit smaller - else why bother) in income tax, whilst those in work will in total be better off, pensioners will be worse off.
3/
The Pensions & Lifetime Savings Association has updated its guide to living costs in retirement. The full report is well worth a read, and goes into a lot of detail.
One key point is that it assumes that pensioners own their home outright - probably reasonable now, but the shift to renting means that in future years that may become increasingly questionable.
2/
It focuses on retirement income, but note that other sources may be used to fund retirement, whether it be income from savings/investments, or gradual withdrawal of capital. Much more likely to be relevant for those aspiring to a comfortable lifestyle of course.
3/
UKHSA estimates that prevalence of COVID in England and Scotland has nearly tripled in the month since the ONS restarted its COVID infection surveillance.
Fortunately prevalence is lowest at the oldest, more vulnerable age groups, but is estimated at just under 6% in the 18 to 44 age groups.
2/
Prevalence is estimated to be highest in the London area, at just over 6% across the population. Note though that confidence intervals are wider due to lower sample sizes than in previous studies.
So with the news this morning that the earnings growth announced today means the state pension (SP) will very likely increase by another 8.5% next year, it's time to set out once again why the SP triple lock (TL) is such a bad idea.
1/
It's all down to cherry-picking the best of the three rates each year. I did a thread nearly a year ago, that hopefully sets out clearly how the mechanism inevitably means that the SP will grow over time against both earnings (E) and prices (P).
With BH's still distorting individual weeks' figures, the cumulative position gives a better view, with the latest CMI age-standardised analysis showing mortality 3.8% (of a full year's mortality) worse than its reference year of 2019.
Here's the mea culpa - it was only wrong by a factor of 13, but at least the post has been deleted rather than just corrected and left up, when experience shows that only a fraction of the original audience will see the correction.
So what are the true numbers?
2/
In E&W the peak week in 2020 was just under 9,000, and the second wave peak was pretty close to that number.
In total ONS has recorded 199,728 COVID related deaths in E&W since the pandemic started.