There have been many people pointing out that the proliferation of dancing nurses and doctor videos since the onset of global COVID19 policy has been...well...tacky. I agree, but also think there may be more going on.
🧵...
Several months ago, while still a Twitter newbie, I wrote a thread about an artist named Meyerhold. (Here it is:)
He was a large influence on the performance art piece I created as well. The way movement impacts and inspires people beyond just the emotional impact to the viewer isnt something that is discussed often, however we can see it throughout history.
While watching the seemingly endless dancing nurses videos, I was suddenly struck a few weeks ago by a memory; I’d seen this before...many times.
My mother is both a victim and survivor of communism. She was a performer and an actress. I have a degree in the theater arts. I have, over the years noted the ways that the performing arts are both influenced by and influence authoritarian regimes.
Performance is at its most simplified a form of story telling; even when the performance may appear to simply be something else.
It’s been over 14 months since those videos of dancing as part of the COVID19 crises began. So what story are we being told and telling? This is the question I keep asking myself. This thread is a study of that.
While patients are seen in the videos out of Wuhan, note that they are absent in the videos streaming into our homes in the west. D
There is a disconnection between the “essential workers” and everyone else.
Only a select few are encouraged and able to join each other and through music, movement and even humor find comfort in a sense of unity.
Only a select few may joyfully gather.
It’s difficult for those deemed “inessential” to understand how a crises allows the time for large choreographed and filmed dance routines.
Or why only some people are allowed to create for themselves and each other a ritualized time, space and actions.
Why only some are celebrated for celebrating.
Remember. These are “patients.”
They are not well enough to care for themselves. They are not responsible enough to care for each other without strict rules of confinement.
I’ll leave you with one more thought. It’s our time to dance.
🧶
@Studio28nyc you’ll appreciate this. Btw…great handle. Nostalgia abounds.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ooana Trien ~ Eric Arthur Blaire’s Mistress

Ooana Trien ~ Eric Arthur Blaire’s Mistress Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ooana

Aug 3
🧵THREAD: What Really Happened in World War I The Great War

Not the story you were taught. A tale of broken empires, ritual inversion, and the memory war that never ended.
🕯️ On this day, August 3rd, Germany declared war on France. But the real story started long before…and it’s still unfolding.
1. The End of a Sacred Order

World War I was not just a geopolitical accident.
It was a ritual dismemberment of the old world monarchies, lineages, and sacred patterns of time and memory.

Czar Nicholas. Emperor Franz Joseph. Kaiser Wilhelm.
All related. All gone by war’s end.

This was not chance.
2. A War Against the West

What collapsed in 1914 wasn’t just empires.
It was faith itself—the covenant between the individual, the sacred, and the real.

It wasn’t only Christendom that fell,
but the very promise of religion:
That life had meaning.
That suffering had dignity.
That the soul stood before God - not the State.
Read 37 tweets
Jul 22
THREAD 🧵 | Why some media outlets may shut down instead of reporting the truth: The hidden history behind the Smith-Mundt Act, intelligence-media networks, and the rise of the information-industrial complex (2012 to 2025) - a study.
1. They call it the Great Narrative. We call it what it is: weaponized consensus built by midwit technocrats, intel cutouts, and corporate priests.

You’re not watching collapse.
You’re watching controlled reconstruction through chaos.

Let’s name it all.
Let’s ✨Zachor what we learned from Covid.
2. It started in 2012. Quietly.

Congress passed the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, buried in the NDAA. It repealed a Cold War rule that banned the U.S. government from deploying propaganda against its own citizens.

The firewall came down. The machine turned inward.
Read 35 tweets
Jul 21
I’ve said it before I’ll say it again loudly for those in the back.

Learn about the Arrow Cross.

🧵How Stalin and Hitler empowered the Arrow Cross in 1944 — and how “woke” logic of friend/enemy distorted reality in Hungary
1. In Oct 1944, Stalin and Hitler helped a fringe paramilitary party — the Arrow Cross — seize power in Hungary in 1944 - A Catholic priest, András Kun, used religion to justify mass executions. Image
2. The Arrow Cross Party began in the 1930s as a minor extremist movement in Hungary.
They called themselves “Green Shirts”, copying the uniform tactics of militant groups in Europe.
The color “green” was meant to signal renewal, nationalism, and peasant identity as a branding move to appeal to “the people.”
Read 30 tweets
Jul 2
Something changed in us after the lockdowns. Not just mentally. Not just emotionally. Deeply. Spiritually. Here’s what I’m seeing—and why we may be living through the long echo of mass psychological programming. 🧵
1/
After the mandates, lockdowns, and messaging loops, I’ve been watching people. And what worries me most isn’t fear.
It’s this:
People no longer seem moved to act just because something is good.
Only if it is “effective,” “impactful,” or “productive.” This inverts Hope.
2/
Rather than Hope being relational and personal it’s mechanized, institutionalized, made into something determined by a system. Vaclav Havel said this about Hope. Image
Read 67 tweets
Jun 20
What the Talmud really says—and why misunderstanding satire leads to dangerous distortion.
Let’s talk about Peter Schäfer, “Yeshu,” and why misreading rabbinic humor is like thinking A Modest Proposal advocated cannibalism. 🧵
1/
@RealCandaceO here cites Princeton scholar Peter Schäfer to claim the Talmud says disgraceful things about Jesus.
That’s not just incorrect—it’s a misreading of satire, of literary context, and of Jewish interpretive tradition. Remember what Robin Williams said about killing all the funny people?
@RealCandaceO 2/
In Jesus in the Talmud, Schäfer analyzes stories about “Yeshu” (a figure some associate with Jesus) in rabbinic texts written centuries after his death.
These stories are not creeds…they’re literary, often satirical, and encoded for a reason.
Read 13 tweets
May 10
Stalin wrote “the base produces the superstructure so that it can serve the base.” Alongside both Hitler and Mao the same principle established the revolution from above as dictated by Lenin. In 2020 Angelo Codevilla wrote this in American Mind prior to the Covid narrative launching the anti-reality and anti - human environment which took advantage of while corrupting the landscape which brought us to today.

Notice that the same arguments against individualism and redefining liberalism (begun by the MSM decades ago I might add) were used by Gorky, Stalin, Hitler, Mao and every totalitarian creep.

“The moral class critique from above was always implicit. It largely stayed in the background of the campaigns for social improvement into which Progressives have led the American people ever since the 1930s, and especially since the 1960s. …But each and all of these campaigns produced mostly the ostensible objectives’ opposites while increasing the numbers of the oligarchy’s members and their wealth and power, endowing them with socio-political clienteles as well as with levers for manipulating them. As its members’ powers grew, they developed a taste for disdaining independent Americans and acquired whips for punishing them.” - Angelo Codevilla 2020

Now it is, at first sight, a simple fight between two groups, one could even call this a class struggle, but Havel in 1977 discovered something which I believe is a key to understanding where we are. But first, we need to explore a bit more what Party means from the point of view of Marxism or, as I believe it would be better to call it, Liberation Theology.

My sense is that we are not actually simply facing two different political ideas battling it out but rather one Religious idea masquerading as economic, philosophical and political, while in truth it is in fact a religious ideology with a method of absorbing all which opposes it into itself via the power of narrative. That is the Great Narrative and it has a structure. It also has a singular author. That author is Party.
More accurately it would be The Party Spirit or even Will.

Under the Soviet’s this term was Partiinost'. It is a transliteration of the Russian term. In Chinese, it is translated as Dangxing (Chinese: 党性). It can be variously translated as party-mindedness, partisanship, or party spirit.

It is one of the philosophical pillars of the Great Narrative which was, and still is, Socrealism or Socialist Realism.

These pillars are:
Klassovost (Class-mindedness or consciousness.)

Narodnsot (People/folk-mindedness or orientation toward the masses)

Ideinost (Idea-mindedness), emphasising that ideas should reflect those of the Party, as well as motivating people for a certain aim.

And of course

Partiinost (Party-mindedness) meaning that every expression was considered political, and the foundation of all knowledge is the Party.

Party is the only purveyor of ideology. And ideology supersedes all, all knowledge all history all wisdom. Morality is not determined by amalgamated wisdom, Torah, The Gospels or from within the human spirit. There is no human spirit. There is only Partiinost; Party Spirit.
And that Spirit has a singular goal, unified and in total and it is determined by Party, not a parent, not a teacher and certainly not any internal choice. The human being is not, according to this principle, capable of making such decisions. It echoes in an interesting way what Codevilla wrote in Revolution 2020
“the logic that drives each turn of our revolutionary spiral is Progressive Americans’ inherently insatiable desire to exercise their superiority over those they deem inferior. Its force, I observed, “comes not from the substance of the Progressives’ demands,” but rather “from that which moves, changes, and multiplies their demands without end. That is the Progressives’ affirmation of superior worth, to be pursued by exercising dominance: superior identity affirmed via the inferior’s humiliation.”
Codevilla continued. “Affirmation of one’s own superiority by punishing inferiors is an addictive pleasure. It requires ever stronger, purer doses of infliction, and is inherently beyond satisfaction.

In short, the Progressive ruling class’s intensifying efforts to oppress those they imagine to be their inferiors is not reversible. It is far less a choice of policy than it is the consequence of its awakening to its own identity—awakening to the powers and privileges to which they imagine their superior worth entitles them. It is awakening to its deep resentment—indeed, to hate—for whoever does not submit preemptively.”

Progressivism does not live purely on the left or the right. This illusion provides cover for the false perception that the march of revolution (or as Tim Pool has drummed for years now) is inevitable.

I will diverge from Codevilla here and this is very important.

Yes, a symptom of this assault from above that uses the appearance of mass consensus (either on the left or the right) we call woke (awakening to its own consciousness) but this is naming the disease without naming the cause.

What he recognizes as a quality of the Progressiveness, and their collective motivation I think he, and most people fail to recognize as The Spirit of Party in general or
Partiinost' or Dangxing.

More of a priest guild - Party is the soul purveyor of Ideology. And ideology is what assures Party it has an existence.

Ideology rather than principle is how decisions are made and how power is transferred from one person to the next. Ultimately all principle, all morals, all ethics and all identity becomes subordinated to ideology. To Ideinost.
It is essential to understand the power dynamic here. Party cannot exist without ideology and ideology cannot exist without party.

This dialectical is like a black hole which sucks in everything and everyone around it because it exists only to exist. It makes decisions based only on what will serve its existence and as it grows in power it permits into its “praxis” only those so long as they will serve it.
We have not yet entered complete transformation into a social totality in which there is no escape from the singularity of Ideinost watched by the guards of Partiinost and in truth, since it is so unnatural I do not believe it is actually any more possible that the foolish idea that you can ever reach the horizon line. However….
The consistent belief that it IS possible whether it is right or wrong is what makes this so dangerous.

This, in short is what in Power of the Powerless Vaclav Havel calls The Post Totalitarian Society….
Vaclav explains brilliantly and we would be wise to listen to him how this is distinctively different than a Dictatorship no matter how much it may seem to resemble one. In fact that resemblance is merely another form of Totalitarian Creep obscuring itself and hiding itself behind its primary ally; ideology.

The goal of socrealism is simple. It’s to spread Revolution via transforming the consciousness of its targets.

We now see on all sides of the “political isle” a consistent defending of Marx, Mao, Hitler and Stalin. We see a creation of new hero narratives and a refraining of not only history but also a distortion of literature, theology and western philosophy which is a new myth making. The Purpose of these new myths is to utilize artifice (a form of propoganda and corporate marketing similar to what we saw globally during Covid) to express a simple and deadly idea…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(