I'm often asked about my experience as a CXO at a Vista Equity-backed company. Lots of mystery around their unique playbook, large AUM ($75B AUM) and charismatic (and controversial) founder Robert F. Smith. Here's my 5 lessons from my time at Vista on why they win 🧵⬇️
0 - Andreesen says "Software is eating the world." Robert Smith says "All software tastes like chicken. They’re selling different products, but 80% of what they do is pretty much the same." And that's how they approach the world.
1 - System over Individuals. I always say Vista is the "Alabama" football of PE. They have a clear system of how to play the game and it's system over individuals. Less of a focus on the star players and catering to them.
2 - There's little debate over the plays. Too often in companies there's debate on X vs Y (on which IT software to use, how to measure X) that just wastes time. Vista says this is the way we measure across all companies. No debate.
3 - They have a style. On the investment side, it is well-known that most of their investors wear 3-piece suits emulating the founder Robert F. Smith. When they roll in, you know who is coming and it's time for business. It's pro ball.
4 - Connecting the Peers. Vista spends a lot of time and money getting together the execs (and upper-middle) of Vista companies. This is especially helpful since everyone is running the same plays (#2). You have "seniors" teaching the "freshman" tips on running the plays.
5 - Clear goal. Alabama has a clear goal - national title. Vista like most PE has a clear target - 3X cash on cash returns - in a clear time hold time. All parties know what they are running at.
P.S. That's not to say everything is perfect at Vista or with Robert Smith. Plenty of those articles online & on Glassdoor. But you don't get to their scale, their IRR, & evolution (from lower-middle market software to take private buyouts) without doing something right.
P.P.S. Want to learn more? Give me a follow or sign-up for my newsletter on SMB, software, entrepreneurship through acquisition - bit.ly/etamusings
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) The value arbitrage is real. When we sold GovLoop probably had 10X the brand awareness and customer reach than GovDelivery but were worth probably 20X less in enterprise value.
2) The talent arbitrage is real as well. Comparing apples to apples - media talent is higher calibre, more output for less money than the same talent doing similar work at SaaS companies.