Share this page!

Gerry Doyle Profile picture
Twitter logo
3 May, 4 tweets, 1 min read
so, this is pretty nonsensical

taibbi is out of his depth, but the reason the cia wants a diverse workforce is because it can't function as an intelligence agency without one. that's not woke (or a failure of the left, as he bizarrely argues), it's practical Image
stole this screenshot from @AthertonKD, btw
I don't know how the same people come up with the dumbest takes over and over, but here we are
imagine the cia thinking: we should only hire midcareer straight english-speaking white men, this will definitely give us the edge against china

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Gerry Doyle

Gerry Doyle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mgerrydoyle

Gerry Doyle Profile picture
3 May
I see we have been shouting at each other about who should get the most resources to deter/fight a war with china
I have no hot take here, but it's a mistake to assume either that china has the ability to wipe u.s. counterattack possibilities off the board or that u.s. forces in the region are invulnerable

(that's the opposite of a hot take)
it does seem pretty clear that a war with china would primarily involve sea and air forces. ain't no one invading the mainland. the spratlys are probably cruise missile bait rather than marines over the beach
Read 5 tweets
Gerry Doyle Profile picture
12 Feb
we have reached the stage in the dystopia where the crowdfunding platform is like, "hang on a second"
seriously: the social and *economic* benefits of free education, health care and child care are robust and well-studied. the continued pretense that "actually helping people hurts them, because MorAl hAzaRd," is harmful and needs to stop
it is not, repeat not, "heartwarming" to see communities scrounging up change so someone can get a life-saving surgery. it's great that people care but it's sickening that a person's life could depend on the means and generosity of strangers
Read 4 tweets
Gerry Doyle Profile picture
10 Feb
incredible to see an elected official say this out loud
there is no equivalence between protests for social justice, in which what little violence there was, was against property, and the jan. 6 insurrection. none. not in degree, not in kind.
the prosecution is showing two things: that there was an insurrection, and that the president incited it. both facts are, tbh, extremely clear and supported by piles of evidence, some of which was presented today.

the gop defense: "nuh-uh"
Read 5 tweets
Gerry Doyle Profile picture
21 Jan
new *what* orders!?
the f-16 entered service in *1978* and unless we are talking about a "super falcon" type deal where the guts and airframe are completely revamped, ala the (awkwardly designated) f/a-18e/f then this is not a front-line aircraft in coming decades
the u.s. shouldn't be investing in buying new aircraft that can't easily operate in a contested environment, imo. the f-16 is a hot ride that can turn on a dime but it's not built for the mid-2000s
Read 5 tweets
Gerry Doyle Profile picture
29 Dec 20
yeah, that's not really the best takeaway

it took the better part of four years for the political media to come around to the idea that it was ok to say true things, such as "trump lies." would be nice if we could hang onto lessons like that
there is also a real danger of thinking "covering biden the same way" equals four years of the same sorts of stories. trump generated the coverage he did because of the person he is and the things he did.
for instance,
Read 4 tweets
Gerry Doyle Profile picture
17 Nov 20
that's correct.
the jcpoa put iran's nuclear program in the deep freeze, at basically no cost to the u.s. and its allies.

the u.s. decision to pull out of the deal spun up iran's nuclear program to the point where the u.s. is considering military force to stop it

just insane
and (sigh) if we're going to talk about what military force would look like, it's perhaps more complex than you think.

tomahawks can get the job done vs. surface targets, stuff that isn't buried or overly hardened. but you also need to take iran's counterattack off the table
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @mgerrydoyle has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @mgerrydoyle!

Read all threads by @mgerrydoyle