Ambassador Ahmet Üzümcü & @CSRisks, asking questions and not getting straight answers from the @opcw does not constitute an 'intense defamation campaign'. Let's ask some of the key questions again shall we:- @Tim_Hayward_
2) Why was the assessment of 4 NATO toxicologists, that the victims at Location 2 were not killed by chlorine gas, removed from the Final Report with all record of the NATO assessment removed? @2ndNewMoon
3) Why were inaccurate witness reports of Sarin nerve agent symptoms (which was never found) clearly reported in the original interim report (see here) but obfuscated in the final report & with 'constricted pupils' (a key indicator of Sarin) deleted?:- wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
4) Why was confirmation that some victims had been re-positioned throughout the night of 7-8 April, clearly reported in the original interim report here, buried in the Annex of the Final Report?
6) Why was an engineering report, confirming the incompatibility between the damage on this cylinder and the hole in the roof, blocked from consideration?
8) Given all of these critical issues Ambassador (and @CSRisks), why do you not support an eminently reasonable request from leading experts & voices to allow *all* of the Douma FFM team to discuss the Douma Report and the science behind it? berlingroup21.org@aaronjmate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As claims about chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria circulate, and calls are made for witnesses to be heard, here is a reminder of key scientific issues regarding the @opcw's investigation of the alleged Douma attack. @CL4Syr @MichaKobs @aaronjmate piersrobinson.substack.com/p/the-censored…
1) This alleged attack became controversial when OPCW whistleblowers revealed information had been manipulated and censored in order to blame the Syrian government @ukcolumn @UKCExtracts @Tracking_Power ukcolumn.org/article/the-ce…
2) For example, analysis showing the incompatibility between the chlorine gas cylinders and the supposed damage they had caused when hitting ceilings was suppressed. @citizenjournos_ berlingroup21.org/front-matter-a…
Dr. Gilbert Doctorow, in this interview with @Judgenap, implicates MI6 in the assassination of General Igor Kirillov due to his investigation of MI6 chemical weapons false flags, involving White Helmets, in Syria ( at 11:00 onwards)
1) He notes that @thetimes endorsed this assassination. The same newspaper which has itself been involved in MI6 sample gathering operations in Syria<<. berlingroup21.org/front-matter-a…
2) At the time of the controversial alleged attack in Douma 2018, General Kirillov, was interviewed regarding the event:
As heavily propagandised elites in the West celebrate the overthrow of the Syrian government, a reminder. As Wesley Clark revealed, the US planned to 'regime-change' 7 countries in 5 years. @ic911justice
1) The overthrow of the Afghan government in 2001 led to 20 years of war and no less than 176 000 direct deaths, as documented by the Watson Institute. watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/fig…
2) The overthrow of the Iraqi government in 2003 was underpinned by now documented deceptions regarding fictitious weapons of mass destruction. 315 000 dead, probably many more. Ensuing civil war was beset with extremist groups. academic.oup.com/psq/article/12…
This is indeed where we are now at. Current geopolitical realities can be traced directly to the 9/11 manufactured war trigger, or false flag attack on the US. @ic911justice. This was when Bush and Blair conspired as to when to hit Iran, Syria and Iraq
1) Prior to 9/11, Philip Zelikow - who, a little coincidentally ;) - ended up directing the 9/11 Commission, penned a Foreign Affairs paper warning of a catastrophic terror event in 1998. ic911.org/journal/articl…
2) The psychological shock of 9/11 was immediately exploited in order to initiate multiple 'regime'-change wars, as Wesley Clark explained several years later
For anyone yet to realise the import of the 9/11 event, the current round of wars across the Middle East, including genocide against the Palestinians, started with this manufactured - or false flag - war trigger. Destruction of Syria and Iran was always the goal. @ic911justice
1) This policy of war is underpinned by multiple strategic deceptions, some of which, such as the Iraq WMD deception, are well established. @thecoastguy @JamesMelville academic.oup.com/psq/article/12…
2) Others, such as the deception campaign involving chemical weapons allegations against the Syrian government, are known to those who have been paying attention. See this thread for fuller details:
As war escalates in Syria, a reminder that the 'Assad is bad' narrative has been maintained via repeated allegations of chemical weapons use. As revealed by the @opcw whistleblower scientists, this narrative has been maintained through deception. berlingroup21.org/courage-founda…x.com/WVanwagenen/st…
1) The key problem with the allegations, in the first instance, is that they have been supplied by organisations (such as the White Helmets, CBRN task force, Violations Documentation Center) linked to opposition groups and countries seeking to overthrow the Syrian government.
2) As @aaronjmate explains in this article, reliance upon such sources broke a fundamental rule that investigations should not rely upon evidence supplied by intermediaries thegrayzone.com/2022/09/09/syr…