1/ Official news are out that the money for metro rail in the Italian recovery fund will go toward a 11km extension of Catania's 🚇metro system.
Here is make a thread about a system that started its life not so well, but has a very good potential for the future.
2/ Catania's metro has long been the tiniest metro system in Italy, contending this not so enviable title with Genova. It's still the least used one, with some 20k/day users in 2019 (7M/year).
But what is the history behind a system that is atypical in the Italian context?
3/ Catania is a 300k city with some 7-800k inhabitants in a metropolitan area spreading along the Eastern coast of Sicily and on the fertile foothills of Etna, cultivated with wine, pistachios, oranges, lemons, prickly pears🤤 etc.
4/ At the end of 19th century, the Ferrovia Circumetnea (FCE), a 950mm gauge rail, was built to connect the harbor and Catania's mainline station to those spreading villages and towns forming a ring around the Etna, crossing through lava fields and rugged terrains
5/ The line has been operating since then, with a street running section through central Catania between Borgo station and Centrale. As many private local lines, it was nationalized in the 1950s, but kept under the central government control instead of the regional one.
6/ A project to convert the urban section into a proper metro line was approved in the 1980s, and a first short 3.6km section, with 6 stations was opened finally in 1999, after several delays. Unlike the rest of the FCE, it was built to standard gauge, preventing through-running
7/ During the 2000s, the idea of making this little, very lightly used 3.6km stretch the initial section of a proper U-shaped metro from Misterbianco to the Airport via the old city gained momentum, and two extensions at both ends (black dotted) were funded and works started
8/ It goes without saying, works were delayed again and again but finally, both extensions have been opened between 2016-17. Now reaching the city center at Stesicoro, the line has passed from 600k/year to 7Mk/year in just 3 years.
9/ A two station western extension is in advanced construction and may open next year. The first part of fundamental extension to the airport via the city center has been u/c since 2019, and the full extension will be u/c by the current year.
10/ Finally, the NextGenEU will finance with 415m€ an 11,5km extension to the West, connecting several large towns on Etna's foothill and replacing the slow and not so well placed section of the FCE rail. The line will be built a/g and u/g in C&C.
11/ When all those extension will be commissioned in 2026 🤞, the line will be some 30km long and carry up to 130-150k/day. A small revolution for a city with a quite bad transit system and legendary traffic.
12/ Other projects are in the pipeline: the full double tracking of the FS mainline to be converted into an urban passante, with an unfortunate NIMBY-inspired choice to abandon the "archi della marina" for a deeper, costlier u/g alignement south of the central station
13/ A pessimistic final note: as too often in southern Italy, the risk is to see the infrastructure finished but the service not adequately funded, leaving people to cope with an insufficiently frequent and unreliable service. Let's hope it's not the case here.
14/ Well, let's finish with a more positive note: the line is probably one of the cheapest ever built in Italy, despite being mostly u/g, and boasting also mined stations in lava rock in the city center: between 40m€ and 75m€/km depending on sections.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's always interesting to note how, unsurprisingly, the history of transportation planning is nested in the shifting larger paradigms of urban planning.
The only two sizable "greenfield" outlying sections of Frankfurt U-Bahn follow two different paradigms of urban integration.
The only greenfield section part of the overall pre-metro scheme built in the initial phases run either underground or in a freeway median, within an area of interwar (Romerstadt) and postwar modernist development.
Grade-separation was the "gold standard" for everything back then
The 2000s addition to the U-Bahn network, serving the large greenfield development of Riedberg, whose own urban design reverts to the "traditional" perimeter block, run as a tramway on a street tree-lined median with signal-controlled intersections. Quite the change of paradigm.
One of the reasons why French tramways tend to be relatively slow is that they often have very curvy and zigzagging alignments. There are two main reasons for that, one linked to the history of urban development in France, the other to how and when French networks developed.
The historical reason is that France, outside of Paris intramuros, it's not a country of Grand Boulevards and large urban schemes. With one of the most property owners-friendly land regimes, French cities mostly grew with chaotic street patterns during both the 19th and 20th c.
Streets, even major radial arterials, tend to be narrow until the postwar era, outside of a few isolated redevelopment schemes, such as Grenoble's 20th c. boulevards or Bordeaux 18th c. Triangle. Provincial elites never indulged in the grandiose schemes of the capital city.
Not only Seattle (and many other cities) opt for mined stations in city-center areas, but they also do it in the most bloated way, with full-length mezzanines and wide off-street access shafts.
Let's look at a more sober approach to mined stations from u/c Vienna's U5
First, the Seattle approach (veru common in NA mined stations) is to go with a large cavern encompassing both tracks, a central platform and a "full-length mezzanine, that is a slab above the platform level allowing for horizontal circulation outside of platform space
The wide two-level single cavern is connected to the vertical shafts via two "transepts" (mined tunnels perpendicular to the cavern), as the shafts are built rigorously off-street. Additionally, a diagonal mined tunnel can host escalators.
Today, the much-awaited, 5, 5 km, 8 station, metro line 6 in Naples was finally (re)opened* (with limited service) after a 40+ years-long saga that is emblematic of how the bad choices and habits of the 1980s still haunt Italy today.
A 🧵
Naples' line 6 has a very troubled history. It was initially planned in the early 1980s as the "Linea Tranviaria Rapida", an LRT-like system mixing at-grade and grade-separated segments crossing the city East-West roughly along the coast.
It was planned following the approval of a national law encouraging the construction of "LRT-like" systems, to be built with local and national funds with the involvement of the state-controlled IRI conglomerate, via non-competitive 30 years "concessions of sole construction"
A recent exchange in here reminded me that historically there has essentially been two main paths toward level boarding of mainline rail.
The prevalence of one type or the other in a country depends a lot of when and how the railway became a commuter-oriented mobility tool.
A🧵
The 19th c. railways had very low platforms, just slightly higher than the tracks, either in wood, masonry, or simply a stone curb filled with gravel. Essentially, a glorified sidewalk.
That was ok for a railway with sparse traffic and generous dwelling times.
But platforms that require passengers to climb several steps to get into the trains, whose boogie-mounted floors are often >100 cm high above the track, are unfit for the need of the higher frequency, high traffic railway catering to the hinterland-to-city commuters.
How does Zurich achieve consistent running times and an elevated average speed on its legacy tramway network despite the fact that it's not fully running on dedicated lanes?
An example of urban integration and conflict management strategies along a segment of line 3
A🧵
Tramway line 3 covers the 4.3 km, 11-stop section between its terminus at Albisrieden to Sihlpost /HB in 16 minutes, with consistent running times throughout the say, averaging a pretty good 16 km/h speed.
How does it achieve these performances?
Let's start from line 3 western terminal loop, where the tram enters the general circulation protected by a traffic light and then continues along the central lanes of a suburban street. All lateral streets yield to the main arterial which is a "priority street"