Luis V. Sanchez Profile picture
May 3, 2021 17 tweets 8 min read Read on X
I had a fascinating conversation covering the payments industry with an early Square employee for @MosaicRM.

We discuss: Jack Dorsey, $SQ, $PYPL, Stripe, $AFRM, $APT, $V, $MA, & more

Here is a thread containing my highlights:
Part of Jack Dorsey's "secret sauce" was to scale himself out of multiple companies which forced him to build the right teams at $SQ and $TWTR early on
Square aimed to create a value-added product in a commoditized industry. Today it has established itself as a payment services "platform" $SQ
Square has two distinct and powerful customer acquisition vehicles: payment processing for merchants & Cash App for consumers $SQ
Why owning payment processing is a competitive advantage for Square $SQ

"[It] allows them to expand in all sorts of possibilities that if you didn't own those parts of the experience and of the stack, you wouldn't necessarily be able to."
The difference between large enterprise customers and small merchants as for payments processors
Why Square increasingly views Stripe as a competitor. $SQ

"I would say that there are aspects of Square that start poking into Stripe's domain of expertise"
The competitive dynamics between PayPal and Square $PYPL $SQ

"[payments] start converging and eventually meet: on one end, on the merchant and how they get paid, and on the other end, on the consumer and how they choose to pay. They start going in competition with each other."
Can buy-now-pay-later companies evolve from 'payment feature' into 'payment platforms'?

"I worked at Square. I also saw how payments processing, previously thought of as a commodity, can really become its own thing."
On the source of Visa and Mastercard's pricing power. $V $MA
Can Square eventually displace the Visa and Mastercard rails? $SQ $V $MA

"You could envision Square eventually displacing Visa, but Visa's keeping a close eye on it as it grows. Visa and Mastercard, they're not going to stand around and wait to be displaced in that regard."
Square's bank charter could help it create proprietary rails & lower cost. $SQ

"Square's move into becoming a bank makes this possible because you can't do a lot of stuff unless you're legally a bank to store money, transfer money, make loans, and do things like that officially"
Fintech companies will aim to push transaction costs to zero or near zero which could completely change the power balance of the payments industry.
The cost of transactions over blockchain is orders of magnitude greater than legacy payments rails and may never be cost-competitive due to the computing intensity.
Square and PayPal's blockchain initiative was in large part a customer acquisition strategy $SQ $PYPL
A full transcript of the call is available here: stream.mosaicrm.com/i/a2b41b

It requires a subscription to @MosaicRM

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luis V. Sanchez

Luis V. Sanchez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LuisVSanchez777

Feb 7, 2022
A lot of musicians are complaining about the economics of Spotify but lost in the debate is how the company saved the entire music industry.

From $SPOT's 10K:
Considering that record labels take the lion's share of streaming royalties, perhaps their angst is mistargeted?

@SleepwellCap explains it well here sleepwell.substack.com/p/music-stream…
Another lie going around is that Apple/other services pay artists more.

No, the royalty agreements are very similar across the services.

The royalty pools are fixed, it's primarily that SPOT users are more engaged.

variety.com/2021/digital/n…
Read 5 tweets
Nov 6, 2021
Scuttlebutt is something few investors do well because it's fraught with confirmation bias.

In addition to the interviewer potentially asking leading questions, it's important to think about what biases the interviewee may have.

Some quick thoughts on what works for me:

1/x
If I am interviewing a former employee, I always ask about the terms on which they left their former company.

I always try to interview industry people from multiple companies with different perspectives and different levels of responsibilities.

2/x
NEVER go on the opinion of a single person. I ask similar questions to several people in order to assess the "industry expert consensus".

I take notes on every call (don't trust memory) and talk to the same experts 6 mo later to see if their views changed (they often do).

3/x
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(