name the “others” opposed to the waiver! Someone name them, it’s always mysterious anonymous advisors nytimes.com/2021/05/03/us/…
after all the bullshit about how the global south doesn’t have “capacity”, and the TRIPS waiver is a “side show” and a “distraction” and it’s really “complex” and how the real problem is “corruption” in poor countries this is all the opposition to patent suspensions comes down to
what's noteworthy is how little Big Pharma's talking points have changed. When 39 drugmakers sued South Africa in 1998 for manufacturing unsanctioned generic AIDS drugs, they, like today, argued IP was a non sequitur and that the real issue was capacity in poor countries.
A 2000 episode of The West Wing was even kind enough to turn this racist and cruel Pharma talking point into a dramatic plot beat
TOBY: africans cannot tell time
[cue dramatic music]
JOSH: I was wrong to think cheap AIDS medication was a good idea
[cut to All State commercial]
in 2001, some AIDS activists claimed the Bush admin, who mimicked the "Africans can't tell time" line were, in fact, simply repeating what they heard on The West Wing
Sadly I’m 100% sure that’s what happened. I mean, it’s not like the Bush officials wouldn’t have been super racist otherwise but im 100% sure they saw the stupid West Wing episode and were like “oh that’s good, that’s a great line to justify defending pharmaceutical giants”
Andrew “Bell Curve” Sullivan also used the “Africans can’t tell time” argument around that same time while secretly shilling for a Pharma lobbying group newrepublic.com/article/162000…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There’s a frog in boiling water element to this too. On polymarket you can bet on whether Gaza will be ethnically cleansed. On Kalshi you can bet on whether they’ll be famine in Gaza (that one paid out for ‘yes’ btw) This is objectively depraved and should not be legal but 1/2
it is not only legal but totally normalized and never commented on by anyone in our media. CNN, by partnering with Kalshi, is going to be “reporting on the news” now while offering the chance to wager on these events. On mass death, starvation, dispossession and genocide. 2/2
The fate of victims of an ongoing genocide—a genocide often supported and backed by the same investors and executives of these gambling apps—are just another chip on a roulette table. The total dehumanization of the billions of NPCs they wager on and fleece is complete and total.
A simple way of explaining this to people is that Israel’s calculus is that they can maintain apartheid and carry out genocide and will still be seen as a normal country—just with some bad apples. BDS says no, this is unacceptable. Israel is banking on Business As Usual. 1/4
“Open dialogue” claptrap is just another version of Business As Usual. To the extent speaking to Israelis in person has any political utility (very debatable) it is VERY MUCH outweighed by the more urgent and meaningful goal of cementing Israel’s pariah status. 2/4
There’s a reason why 38 states have passed anti-BDS laws and exactly zero have banned Socratic Masterminds like Peter Beinart or Ben Burgis from speaking to Israelis. One challenges actual power, one is fart sniffing idealism and/or careerism 3/4
None of the people in these emails lovingly chatting with Epstein will face social consequences and we know this because in 2019 it was revealed Bill Gates met with Epstein several times—and his wife of 30+yrs divorced him over it!!—and this basically went into a memory hole.
It’s an interesting PR tactic common with pro-Israel groups I call Quantum Zionism. they put on press tours, trips to Israel, luncheons etc for politicians, then when it’s a politician critical of Israel they go “um obsessed with Israel much? Hum, curious why that would be?”
The obvious implication is this “singling out” or “obsession” can only be explained by antisemitism. But they can’t actually say this because they don’t have the courage or substance to level such a charge so it’s just heavily implied
Trump openly said his motives for attacking Venezuela are to seize its oil. But recent explainers in WaPo, Politico, BBC pontificating about Trump's motives do not mention this fact at all. I wrote about western media's bizarre refusal to state the obvious columnblog.com/p/media-pontif…
For years Trump has openly talked about how he thinks the US should take over other countries' resources. Indeed, exploitation of resources is his most consistent, publicly espoused motive behind his foreign policy. Why is this dynamic rarely discussed in Venezuela coverage?
I get that 'resource grab' stuff has the undignified and Unserious whiff of conspiracy but this isn't an issue when the guy in charge openly says “when I left, Venezuela was ready to collapse. [Had I won in 2020] we would have taken it over, we would have gotten all that oil.”
this is all so tedious. This sleight-of-hand is exactly what make the Abundance guys so cynical. What Sanders says here is that the generic "good govt" stuff is banal and fine. The issue is **this is not the whole of their project** which anyone with two brain cells can see
The Abundance "movement," as it exists in reality, (rather than a vague marketing pitch) but actual policies, think tanks and funders with actual goals, is defined by deregulation and left-punching. And anytime this is mentioned they do the coy "Who me?🥺I just want more stuff"
everything Abundance argues that is unobjectionable is vague to the point of being politically meaningless. Everything they actual specify, when it comes to actual trade offs, priorities, and narrative focus is explicitly anti-populist and pleasing to their billionaire patrons.