It’s an interesting PR tactic common with pro-Israel groups I call Quantum Zionism. they put on press tours, trips to Israel, luncheons etc for politicians, then when it’s a politician critical of Israel they go “um obsessed with Israel much? Hum, curious why that would be?”
Nov 5 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Trump openly said his motives for attacking Venezuela are to seize its oil. But recent explainers in WaPo, Politico, BBC pontificating about Trump's motives do not mention this fact at all. I wrote about western media's bizarre refusal to state the obvious columnblog.com/p/media-pontif…
For years Trump has openly talked about how he thinks the US should take over other countries' resources. Indeed, exploitation of resources is his most consistent, publicly espoused motive behind his foreign policy. Why is this dynamic rarely discussed in Venezuela coverage?
Nov 3 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
this is all so tedious. This sleight-of-hand is exactly what make the Abundance guys so cynical. What Sanders says here is that the generic "good govt" stuff is banal and fine. The issue is **this is not the whole of their project** which anyone with two brain cells can see
The Abundance "movement," as it exists in reality, (rather than a vague marketing pitch) but actual policies, think tanks and funders with actual goals, is defined by deregulation and left-punching. And anytime this is mentioned they do the coy "Who me?🥺I just want more stuff"
Oct 17 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Ah I see the Christian studio behind the Qanon exploitation film Sound of Freedom is releasing a gritty origin story hagiography on George Washington July 4 weekend 2026 and doing the aggrieved “help us make it the No 1 film in America (to own the libs)” marketing campaign
Mel Gibson chose to make the enslaved people free black workers (unclear why 18th century Mel Gibson would be so kind??) when he did The Patriot, curious how they handle this awkward fact. They may just ignore it, or just imply his slaves are cool and chill with the situation
Oct 16 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Another attempt at a fake scandal, Mamdani’s position on this is the same as Trump’s (thus far at least, thankfully). Demanding Hamas disarm is a nonstarter for obvious reasons. This is a rational and moral position because the alternative is open-ended nonstop genocidal killing
“Hamas shouldn’t be forced to disarm” isn’t some abstract normative position, or endorsement of Hamas, it’s a rational position because that’s what a “ceasefire” is—a cessation of firing—not demanding unconditional surrender from one side.
Sep 16 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Vance’s speech was a masterclass in shameless demagoguery. They cant find any credible media “cheering on” Kirk’s killing so they just highlight media criticizing him, then pivot to random nobodies celebrating Kirk’s death, then seamlessly switching back and forth between the two
The reason the goal posts has to shift from “celebrating Kirk’s killing” to “mocking it” to “being mean/misquoting him” is because no one with any power or significance on “the left” celebrated it so they have to create a fog by mixing in random social media posts w/ “the media”
Sep 9 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
One of the few certainties in social science is high social trust is essential to healthy societies which can only be achieved through greater equality. We not only rejected greater equality (ofc) but built our economy around a machine whose primary value proposition is deception
Having a technology adopted overnight that is, in most of its applications, premised on tricking people (often in intimate settings), doing plagiarism remix, letting Silicon Valley do our political thinking for us and exploiting people with mental health problems is Probably Bad
Sep 8 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Ok even if one accepts this frame where the perceived victim gets veto power over language, every single time a Democrat in congress says “Israel has a right to defend itself” 100s of kids are killed that week, nonstop for 100 weeks. Why isnt this expression therefore off limits?
This squishy bullshit sounds superficially sensible to half paying attention liberals, racists, or both. But more Palestinians were killed in first two weeks of the “Israel-Hamas war” than Israelis have been killed by Hamas since the creation of Hamas 40 years ago.
Sep 6 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Buddy upon news of the merger Ellison **put out a press release in the Jerusalem Post detailing how he “loves Israel” and “quietly donates quite a bit to the State of Israel and the IDF”**
Bari Weiss is a one note shill for Israel. But for sure, it’s just the free market at work
Even the sycophantic Puck News write up which was more or less transcribed from Ellison acknowledges her substack isn’t worth $150million. CNN and NYT both bury references to their mutual hatred of Palestinians as a reason for the deal. Let us be serious.
Aug 23 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
This has every dishonest liberal cliche:
1) One Bad Man Theory
2) Reinforce “Hamas must go” pretext for genocide (how exactly, magic??)
3) meaningless “offensive” vs “defensive” weapons
4) “two state solution” pablum
5) centering needs and ego of state committing genocide
Not sure what it would look like to “turn” on Mamdani, but I assure you any such “turn” will be grounded in (admittedly difficult and complex) value judgments on key issues. All politics requires subjective analysis of priorities and compromises, this is kind of its whole deal
I assure you conditional support is not some neurosis of the left, and we know this because Mamdani won the democratic primary and the whole of the democratic establishment—from Schumer to Gillibrand to Jeffries—refuses to endorse him. This is also known as “purity politics”
Aug 12 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
The thing is this isnt really a change. Conditioning bombs to the flow of aid is consistent w/ 2024 Dem consensus of Bomb Palestinian Kids on 600 Calories a Day vs the (R) position of Bomb Palestinian Kids on an Empty Stomach—modestly preferable but still objectively pro-genocide
The fact that this very low bar is now considered some type of “break” from Israel is just further evidence that this latest round of performative outrage is an ass covering exercise, something that can be pointed to at a later date.
Aug 9 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
As Dems struggle to find an off-ramp for the increasingly unpopular Gaza genocide, they've settle on blaming "Netanyahu." I wrote about the rise of One Bad Man Theory and how it serves to obscure much deeper issues with the logic and reality of zionism. columnblog.com/p/its-not-just…
‘Opposition’ leader below. “Netanyahu” is not the issue and the sooner we are honest about this fact, the sooner we can normalize a full arms embargo and sanctioning of the govt in question rather than pinning the genocide on One Bad Man
This is hilarious. Two recent polls by @GQRResearch and @ZenithPolls show Mamdani with a commanding lead among Jewish NYers but rather than cite them, @liamstack frames the question as ontologically unknowable and ignores them. GQR was commissioned by a pro-Israel lobbying group
A series of recent “ok maybe it’s a genocide” pieces all have the same “yes but acknowledging this hurts my feelings” front-loading and it cannot be stressed enough how little a particular truth making you A Sad matters. Go get a binky! Children are fucking dying and starving!
Sorry what is basically a whitegenocide narrative turned out to be solipsistic intellectual toilet paper justifying an ongoing genocide but maybe let’s remove ourselves as the protagonist of history, buckle down, beg for forgiveness and try to save some lives
Jul 31 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
If the word genocide “turns off allies” they shouldn’t be allies. it’s the conclusion of HRW, MSF, Amnesty and virtually all genocide scholars to say nothing of Palestinians who correctly assessed Israel’s motives while JStreet was threatening lawmakers calling for a ceasefire
If Gaza isn’t a genocide then the term literally has no meaning. If one wants to argue that the term itself ought to be retired they are welcome to make that argument but it cannot exist and also not describe Israel’s actions in Gaza. This is not remotely a credible position.
Jul 31 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Once again for the millionth time, demanding as a condition of a “ceasefire” one side surrender and disarm is not a call for a ceasefire. It’s a reiteration of surrender terms and an argument in favor of the pretext for the genocide (“war on Hamas”) to continue indefinitely
Liberals parroting this nonsensical position are being cowardly and very dishonest. this have your cake and eat it too-ism is the primary reason a consensus for an actual ceasefire cannot be reached. It’s an evasion, a cop out and a complete dodge of the central issue.
Jul 30 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
To blunt increasing pressure from the US left and the intl humanitarian and medical community, centrists (and the WH) embraced a “temporary pause” in Nov 2023 that explicitly did NOT end the “war.” This pause was later rebranded a “ceasefire” by Biden and Dem media in Feb 2024
tbc this REMAINS the mainstream liberal opinion. Instead of explicitly supporting the “war on Hamas” indefinitely (because this became impossible) the “ceasefire” rebrand demanded “Hamas have no role in post war Gaza” while nominally calling for a ceasefire which makes zero sense
Jul 29 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Not trying to be a moral hipster here but it’s worth examining why virtually no media outlets critically examined the fact that what the Economist says here (minus the “Iran humbling”) was also true in Oct 2023. Nothing changed except countless Palestinian lives are now destroyed
The fundamentals are the same, all that’s changed is 10,000+ more dead Palestinian children. This campaign was always, at best a nihilistic campaign of mass killing and, at worst, genocide. It turned out to be both. The nominal logic of the “war” never made any sense.
Jul 25 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
NYT's morning newsletter parroting @PatrickKingsley's absurd and deliberately credulous "failure to plan" framing. It wasn't the open pronouncements by Israeli officials they were cutting off food, or the bombing of and propaganda against UNRWA, guys, they just neglected to PLAN! nytimes.com/2025/07/25/bri…
Jul 25 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
My sense is this is too optimistic. I think emaciated children is a bridge too far PR-wise. There’ll be pressure on Israel to allow the UN to do a fraction of whats needed, then it’ll return to the pre-March 2025 status quo and Dems will go back to ignoring/cheer leading genocide
If one reads the statements the demand isn’t an end to the genocide, or “war,” or an arms embargo or demand Trump compel a lasting ceasefire, it’s a return to the pre March 2025 status quo, a/k/a the NYT editorial board line demanding Washington Bomb Children On A Full Stomach
