Heidi Shierholz Profile picture
May 4, 2021 27 tweets 6 min read Read on X
There are certainly a lot of anecdotal reports right now of employers not being able to find the workers they need, particularly in restaurants. But unemployment is still very elevated—particularly among restaurant workers. What’s going on? 1/
First, remember there is *always* a chorus of employers who claim they can’t find the employees they need. One reason for that is that in a system as large and complex as the U.S. labor market there will always be pockets of bona fide labor shortages at any given time. 2/
But a more common reason is employers simply not wanting to raise wages high enough to attract workers. Employers post their too-low wages, can’t find workers to fill jobs at that pay level, and claim they’re facing a labor shortage. 3/
Given how pervasive this dynamic is, I often suggest that whenever anyone says, “I can’t find the workers I need,” you should add “at the wages I want to pay.” 4/
Further, a job opening when the labor market is weak doesn’t necessarily mean the same thing as a job opening when the labor market is strong. There is a wide range of “recruitment intensity” that an employer can apply to an open position. 5/
If employers are trying hard to fill an opening, they will increase the pay and perhaps scale back the required qualifications. If they’re not trying very hard, they’ll offer low pay and hike up the required qualifications. 6/
Recruitment intensity is cyclical, so when a job opening goes unfilled when unemployment is elevated like it is today, employers are even more likely than normal to be holding out for an overly qualified candidate at a very cheap price. 7/
The footprint of a bona fide labor shortage is *rising wages*. Employers who truly face shortages of workers will respond by bidding up wages to attract those workers, and employers whose workers are being poached will raise wages to retain their workers, and so on. 8/
When you don’t see wages growing to reflect that dynamic, you can be fairly certain that labor shortages, though possibly happening in some places, are not a driving feature of the labor market. And right now, wages are not growing at a rapid pace. 9/
While there are issues with measuring wage growth due to “composition effects” in the pandemic, wage series that account for these issues are not showing an unusually strong increase in wage growth. 10/ whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
At a recent press conference, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell dismissed anecdotal claims of labor market shortages, saying, “We don’t see wages moving up yet. And presumably we would see that in a really tight labor market.” 11/
Also, when restaurant owners can't find workers to fill openings at wages that aren’t meaningfully higher than they were before the pandemic—even though the jobs are harder b/c workers now have to deal with anti-maskers and health concerns—that's not a labor shortage. 12/
Further, the labor market added 280,000 jobs in the leisure and hospitality sector in March, the sixth highest percent increase in the last half century, even though average weekly earnings for nonsupervisory workers in that sector equate to annual earnings of just $19,651. 13/
And, while there are certainly fewer job seekers than there would be without COVID—many people are out of the labor market because of Covid-related care responsibilities or health concerns—there are far from enough job openings to provide work for all job seekers. 14/
In the latest data on job openings, there were nearly 40% more unemployment workers than job openings—and more than 80% more unemployed workers than job openings in the leisure and hospitality sector. 15/
One question people raise is whether expanded pandemic unemployment benefits are keeping workers from taking jobs. There was also a lot of fuss about this question a year ago, when workers were getting a $600 additional weekly benefit. 16/
There were several rigorous papers that looked at the impact of the $600, and found extremely limited labor supply effects. If the $600 a week wasn’t keeping people from taking jobs then, it’s hard to imagine that a benefit *half* that large is having that effect now. 17/
Recent history is helpful here. In the aftermath of the Great Recession, counterintuitive reports about employers not being able to find the workers they need captured the public’s imagination over and over again. And (surprise!) it’s happening again here. 19/
After the Great Recession, people claimed there were worker shortages b/c workers didn’t have the right skills for available jobs. We now know that was totally wrong. We got to a 3.5% unemp rate without a massive national training program that accelerated skills attainment. 20/
Thankfully, the “workers don’t have the right skills!” claims have been mostly quiet this time around. But alas, the claims of worker shortages are still deafening. Just remember that like last time, there is likely a LOT less to this than meets the eye. 21/
Excellent additional point here. If employers really couldn't find the workers they need, you'd expect them to be ramping up the hours of the workers they have... 23/ Image
Another key point—tips are down in restaurants, so restaurants must pay higher base wages for workers to get their pre-COVID earnings. This survey found that more than 2/3rds of restaurant workers report tips have dropped at least 50% since COVID. 24/ onefairwage.site/wp-content/upl…
Note, some people are saying that because wages at the low end of the labor market haven’t dropped as much in this recession as they did in the great recession, we have a labor shortage now. So much about that is wrong! 25/
For one, in the first 13 months of both recessions, wage growth for the bottom quartile dropped by about half a percentage point on net. 26/ Image
And of course, if there were a shortage, we'd expect wage growth to be *rising*, not just not falling. 27/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heidi Shierholz

Heidi Shierholz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hshierholz

Feb 20
The immigrant share of the labor force reached a record high of 18.6% in 2023. As a result, anti-immigration forces have been out in full force with a deeply misguided chorus of “immigrants are taking all our jobs.” Here are some key facts, to set the record straight. 1/
The unemployment rate for U.S.-born workers averaged 3.6% in 2023, the lowest rate on record. Obviously, immigration is not causing high unemployment among US-born workers. 2/
The share of prime-age U.S.-born individuals with a job is at its highest rate in more than two decades. In 2023, the prime-age employment-to-population ratio EPOP for U.S.-born individuals was 81.4%, up from 80.7% in 2019 and the highest it has been since 2001. 3/
Read 13 tweets
Jan 23
The #UnionMembership numbers from 2023 were released this morning by @BLS_gov, showing that unionization increased by 191,000 in 2023. There are now 16.2 million workers represented by a union in the U.S. 1/
While union levels increased by 191,000, the share of workers represented by a union declined from 11.3% to 11.2%. There was very strong job growth in 2023 and unionization efforts simply couldn’t keep up with all the new jobs being added. 2/
Before digging in, it’s worth noting that the decline in union density is not because workers don’t want unions. Survey data show that 48% of nonunion workers—more than 60 million workers—would vote for a union in their workplace if they had the chance. More on that to follow. 3/
Read 20 tweets
Jan 19, 2023
Union membership numbers from 2022 were released this morning by @BLS_gov, showing that 200,000 more workers were represented by a union in 2022 than in 2021. There are now more than 16 million workers represented by a union in the U.S. 1/
However, MORE THAN 60 MILLION WORKERS WANTED TO JOIN A UNION, AND COULDN’T. How do we know that? Survey data show that 48% of nonunion workers—more than 60 million workers—would vote for a union in their workplace if they could. 2/
Note, @BLS_gov publishes numbers for both union membership and for union coverage (coverage = those represented by a union contract). In 2022, the share of workers represented by a union was 11.3%, while the share of workers who were union members was 10.1%. 3/
Read 18 tweets
Jan 5, 2023
This morning the @FTC released a proposed rule that, if finalized, will ban noncompete agreements. It is REALLY good. 1/ nytimes.com/2023/01/05/bus…
Why do we need this rule? The only source of power nonunionized workers have vis-à-vis their employers is their ability to quit and take a job elsewhere. So, SURPRISE, employers are using noncompete agreements to cut that source of worker power off at knees. 2/
The research on this is clear. Noncompetes are ubiquitous, they reduce wages, keep workers from finding better opportunities, and reduce the formation of new firms. 3/ epi.org/publication/no…
Read 6 tweets
Jul 8, 2022
We added 372,000 jobs in June, bringing the three-month average to 375,000. This is down from the blistering average pace of 561,000 per month for the 12 months ending in February of this year. Job growth remains very strong, but is clearly moderating. 1/
Wage growth is also clearly decelerating, which is enormously consequential for fed policy. Quarterly wage growth ticked down in June and has dropped substantially in recent months. It is now near its pre-COVID range. 2/
Make no mistake, we want positive real wage growth for workers. But—and this is hugely important—this decelerating wage growth means the Fed doesn’t need more interest rate increases to contain inflation. 3/
Read 13 tweets
May 12, 2022
The latest version of the claim “we can’t have nice things because inflation” is the idea that we can’t cancel federal student debt because... it will cause inflation. PEOPLE NO. 1/ crfb.org/blogs/cancelli…
First, what is the argument of those who are making this claim? The (theoretical) idea is that not having debt payments will unleash spending on goods and services by those who had those debt payments forgiven, boosting inflation. 2/
But folks, there is currently a pause on federal student loan repayments, which means that people with this debt *don’t currently have debt payments*. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(