NEW: Facebook’s self-funded Oversight Board will announce tomorrow whether Trump stays or goes. There will be an 🧨explosion 🧨 of headlines. *Which is exactly what Facebook wants*
It wins if he stays. It wins if he goes. 1/
Imagine Phillip Morris set up the Independent Tobacco Oversight Board in the 80s. Then imagine it deliberated for 3 months over whether to sell cigarettes to kids. This is no different. It’s Facebook distracting attention from its own version of its cancer-causing chemicals.
2/
*Of course* Donald Trump should be permanently banned from Facebook! This is the no brainer of no brainers. He's violated Facebook’s terms of services repeatedly, incited hate & violence & super spreads disinfo. End of.
3/
Reinstating Trump would be an outrage. The Oversight Board will have invited one of the world’s most notorious racists and purveyors of disinfo back onto Facebook. And give the green light to authoritarians across the world.
4/
The Oversight Board is not a Supreme Court. Because Facebook is not a country. It’s a private company that can and should ban Trump as a serial violator of its *own* terms of service.
5/
The “free speech” argument is not an argument, it’s a lie. Donald Trump can say what he likes. But no social media company is obliged to spread his hate and incitements to violence.
6/
Either way, this is a distraction. What’s needed is real accountability. The Oversight Board is a Facebook-paid, Facebook-appointed body created by Facebook to launder its most politically sensitive decisions.
7/
This decision exposes the Oversight Board for what it is - a distraction from Facebook’s failures to take responsibility for its own platform. A PR stunt.
8/
Even if Trump is permanently banned, this decision does absolutely nothing to challenge Facebook’s systemic problems. This doesn’t change the algorithms. And it doesn’t change the “Trump effect” of dictators and extremists following his lead to use Facebook for evil.
9/
A reinstatement would be a green light for dictators everywhere: Already Narendra Modi in India, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, Viktor Orban in Hungary and Rodrigo Duterte in The Philippines all use Facebook in pursuit of authoritarian aims.
10/
Trump is one bad actor. And this is a very expensive show trial. If Facebook was serious about content moderation, *it would employ more content moderators*. It would train & pay them properly.
11/
While Trump pedals the “Big Lie” about the Election, this is the bigger lie. That a Facebook-funded & appointed board is anything other than part of its PR machine. Please see through the spin & ask the bigger questions. Thank you for listening.
12/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Facebook approves alcohol, vaping, gambling and dating ads targeting teens, lobby group finds" by Conor Duffy for @abcnews abc.net.au/news/2021-04-2…
@abcnews "What we found was there was no difference in the way they were treating teenager's data," Reset Australia executive director Chris Cooper said.
@abcnews "It enabled advertisers to buy access to those profiles and target teenagers around very questionable interest areas such as gambling, smoking, alcohol and even their dating status."
As Facebook announces record earnings in just 15 minutes, here’s a reminder of just how much “democracy destruction” the company has caused or facilitated in a single quarter. Remember that, investors. forbes.com/sites/jonathan…
Ahead of Facebook’s quarterly earnings call, RFOB has compiled an Investor Guide to give shareholders a snapshot of the kind of returns they can expect on their investments. This quarter for Facebook...
Insurrection: “Facebook allowed far-right groups to organize in Facebook groups, despite repeated warnings culminating in an attempted coup when Trump’s supporters stormed the US Capitol with the mission of taking elected representatives hostage and overthrowing the gov.”
Australia: “In an effort to strong-arm a democratically elected government, the company turned off access to all reputable news content with the hope of reversing legislation that would require the company to negotiate payment deals with news providers.”
According to Facebook, a data breach of user information occurred “prior to September 2019” executed by “malicious actors.” /2 facebook.com/help/463983701…
NEW: Ethical hacker and breach expert @intidc sat down with the RFOB team for an exclusive discussion on his discovery around the Facebook data breach of 533 million users. THREAD🧵 /1
.@intidc told us that he told Facebook about the contact importer tool, a Facebook tool that made such a breach possible, back in 2017! The company chose not to take action on a serious flaw choosing instead to prioritize growth over privacy security. /2
.@intidc explains why he’s so concerned by the vulnerability he detected. Facebook, in prioritizing user growth over privacy, neglected the safety and security of its users. /3