My life goal is to bridge tools for thoughts and the blockchain, the purpose is to make human thoughts valuable. but there is something missing between people's thoughts and the pure blockchain,I m always thinking about this, what is it?
first, let's talk about the roles of each.
tools for thoughts, with the best representation of roam, is the private deep-thinking self that conducts synthesis and makes creations. It is networked being just like your brain, everything is connected so it's not easy to filter or even share.
the blockchain, with all the beings like defi,nft stuff, is the trusted medium of exchange.The blockchain makes things more liquidate ,attributes things with timestamp so people could have ownership.
so again, what's missing between the two?

i think it's curation.
Ideally, in the process of curation, people are doing public sharing (just like what we do via Twitter) while making their attention/efforts paid back.
To make this happen, we need to collect our curations everywhere on the internet (more than Twitter) to someplace safe, under our own control. And now guys call it metaverse.
Some of you may think of mymind.com, a tasty collecting tool that helps draft your mind path, but we should consider another part of curation: making attention/efforts rewarded.
In short,we should make those curation as DATA assets,or things can be canonically defined (refer to @jessewldn's Canonical Content Registry). So next question is ,who cares about those data assets besides the curators themselves?github.com/mediachainlabs…
One of the answers could be advertisers. Just think about how we curate content, we collect,tag and post on different platforms right? Most times when you actually promote for others, for me I often because I m a believer or true fan of them.
So when they have any marketing budget, i guess it's worthwhile for them to find such 1000+ true fans and incentivize them. KK's theory
a16z.com/2020/01/27/100…
So i m thinking what we do at @OwnershipLabs.
1st, ownership labs is building datadidi extension, which facilitates the metaverse of yourself. You collect and curate your data(across multiple platforms), and then you can share your preferences and let the community find you.
As for the POC of datadidi, we want people to get asymmetry benefits from their curation (Curation means that they use our extension to collect bookmarks, add tags, repost certain content to show their support, and so on.).
github.com/ownership-labs…
it can be achieved via multiple ways, an idea will be, users can get NFT badges that are exclusively co-designed by the advertisers (dApps) and us (ownership labs).
Besides, we are also thinking to match your metaverse with more diversified content,to let more like-mind communities, advertisers,nft artists find you.(Dont worry we hate random ads as well 😈)
We will not do in old-fashion , in web3 we highly respect your privacy and we play positive-sum game. Only if you authorize sharing your data(aka, preferences) with us, we can engage more data scientists to provide matching services for you.
That comes to the 2nd chapter, the data token and data economy.

see you next time 💃 😪
and that's how @BanklessHQ works,1) those who ve donated on @gitcoin will get the airdrop 2) issue NFT to community members

it's an interactive and dynamic relationship between communities and the dApp, not a single way.

@NormanChella

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jessie@FG

Jessie@FG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JESSCATE93

3 Apr
@sapinker Pinker said in [[the stuff of thought]] that a verb is a framework, not just a word to refer to an action.

I find that when I communicate with native eng speakers, sometimes you just say two words and they basically know what you want to say.
This reminds me of the natural habit of language learning (and I think it works, although most people get overly hung up on grammar): sentences are built around their verbs. (a concept here called verb construction)
Instead of studying grammar in detail, I prefer to stretch the boundaries of communication. The difference between the two is

The former favors "accuracy", while the latter emphasizes "matching". The former is for research, the latter for communication.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(