Using the 2007-2020 ISCAP panel survey, I track a population-based sample of Americans who were 18 by 2008.
So I can isolate specific individuals' attitudes & see if they were shifting in ways that might have predicted the coming threat to democracy.
2/
For example, as of October 2020, there was no evidence that people who were Republicans in 2008 thought American elections were less fair than Democrats.
Trends are similar for two measures of system legitimacy.
(Of course, post-election 2020, it's a different story.)
3/
What about support for Trump specifically, and the intensity of that support?
Yes, there was a sizable fraction of people who were very pro-Trump in October 2020...
4/
But Obama actually enjoyed even higher levels of intense support. So the key question isn't about the distribution of views toward the two presidents--it's about how they did or did not mobilize their intense supporters.
5/
And in open-ended questions, Trump supporters were actually less likely to say that they were voting against someone that Biden's supporters were. The responses didn't show much disaffection, either.
6/
What about racial prejudice? Anti-democratic efforts have been connected with the preservation of White citizens' power and the disenfranchisement of Black citizens, American Indians, Latinos, Asian Americans & other groups for centuries.
7/
However, White respondents' levels of expressed racial prejudice against Black Americans have dropped since 2016 and remain well below their Obama-era levels.
Ideological extremity is another worrisome possibility. Citizens who see the opposing side as extreme may be less likely to accept a result that puts it in power.
But there's no real evidence Biden/Trump were perceived as more ideologically extreme than Obama/Romney in '12.
9/
To be sure, there are very alarming features of contemporary public opinion, including high affective polarization & continued racial prejudice.
Those are the building blocks of anti-democratic efforts.
10/
But my point is this: if you wanted to build an early-warning system, there weren't *changes* in American public opinion between late 2007 and October 2020 that would have tipped you off to the emerging threat.
11/
In part, this is important because it suggests that if we want to understand 1/6 or anti-democratic efforts, we can't just look at general population polls. We've got to focus on the much smaller group of elites who mobilize people & the activists who answer those calls.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Yes, it's💯 true that head-to-head polls aren't traditionally very predictive this far out, but there are only elections every 4 years, and much of the existing evidence comes from less polarized times.
2) Certainly, panel data shows that many individual voters can meaningfully report preferences many months out that they continue to hold on Election Day:
In the paper, we use the ISCAP panel (2007-2020) to examine the impacts of negative economic shocks like unemployment and income drops on Americans' attitudes towards unauthorized immigration.
2) I know from prior studies that the relationship between changing racial/ethnic demographics & political behavior is hard to isolate--rapidly changing communities differ in many ways.
Ex. fast-changing communities often more homogeneous to start.
So I want to see similar analyses accounting for things like district partisanship, baseline demographics, etc.--and for the selection biases inherent in looking at GOP-controlled districts.
(Assuming there aren't @RyanDEnos-style experiments, exogenous shocks to be had.)
(compiled with @Penn colleague Diana Mutz & support of many including @RussellSageFdn)
Tracking the same respondents' attitudes on questions like election fairness and system legitimacy, I find little evidence that those beliefs were eroding or polarizing as of October 2020, before the November election, the Big Lie, and 1/6.
We use @YouGovAmerica surveys of political activists in 2016, 2021 to show how Trump is redefining what it means to be "conservative"--even among political activists.
1/
Specifically, our @YouGovAmerica surveys asked political activists (Democrats and Republicans) to assess pairs of politicians, drawn primarily from the U.S. Senate--and tell us who within a pair is more liberal or conservative.
2/
In 2016, you could see pro-Trump GOP Senators (like then-Sen. Jeff Sessions) perceived as more conservative than their voting records suggest.
OTOH, Republicans with very conservative voting records (Sens. Flake, Sasse) who were anti-Trump were seen as more centrist.