Malnutrition among US women. "This is the stuff that keeps me up at night,” says prof. Bailey. And ability to have healthy children? “Going into reproductive age at nutrition risk can cause intergenerational effects"
Important story by @ANDREAAPETERSEN

wsj.com/articles/teen-…
This is a problem not just among teens but women of reproductive age. Slide from a recent talk I gave:
The consequences for children of B12 deficiency
(NIH information)
From WSJ: “Adolescent girls gain 40%-60% of their bone mass from 11-14 years of age,” says Dr. Rome--why calcium, Vit D, magnesium are so critical during this time. But 94.3% of 14-18y old girls eat less than the recommended amount of dairy foods--good sources of calcium, Vit D
And 53.6% of girls, age 14-18y, eat less than the recommended amounts of iron-rich meat, poultry. eggs, according to govt data.
Why? Maybe they are responding to idea that red meat is bad. Tho red meat has 2x more iron than white meat. And iron from meat far more easily absorbed
Important to discuss the real health consequences of cutting out meat. Costs + benefits have not been analyzed, and yet we're taking the plunge into eliminating meat from menus, dinner tables, etc. My recent talk on this issue:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nina Teicholz

Nina Teicholz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bigfatsurprise

9 Feb
In the US, "We live shorter, poorer lives" according to a Nat'l Academies' report. The report was called a "catalogue of horrors." Newspapers were "stunned" and "surprised." That was 2013. “As bad as things were then, they’ve only gotten worse,” says Dr. Woolf from @VCUHealth
By 2019, U.S. was 36th in the world on life expectancy at birth, behind Slovenia, Costa Rica. Recent paper found that even privileged whites fare worse on infant mortality, maternal mortality+deaths from heart attacks than avg. citizens of Norway, Denmark+other developed nations
"The troubling portrait of America’s health did not spur action to paint a better one. Two presidential administrations have ignored it, as has Congress" states this article by @undarkmag, looking back at the 2013 report undark.org/2021/02/01/ame… @XavierBecerra
Read 17 tweets
29 Dec 20
Thread Re: #DietaryGuidelines (DGA), just out:

USDA-HHS Secys said they're for “all Americans,” yet the DGA is scoped ONLY for disease prevention, not treatment. This ignores the 60% of US with a diet-related disease. DGA is thus for minority of Americans who are healthy. Image
Congress' statute says the DGA must be for the "general public"--yet clearly majority of Americans now have diet-related diseases. THIS is the general public, yet Guidelines excludes them. DGA process didn't even look at studies on weight loss, when >42% of adults now w/ obesity.
Tagline of this DGA is "make every bite count," yet did not reduce 10% of calories as sugar, as recommended by the expert committee. Sugar is not just 'empty calories'--it raises blood sugar and over time high blood sugars lead to diabetes (+ increase vulnerability to Covid) Image
Read 10 tweets
7 Jul 20
Here are the major review papers that the USDA has ignored on saturated fats. A decade of science swept under the rug.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
#DelaytheDGA @HouseAgGOP @HouseAgDems @HouseAppropsGOP @AppropsDems 1/
Major review papers on saturated fats ignored by USDA.
ebm.bmj.com/content/early/…
#DelaytheDGA @HouseAgGOP @HouseAgDems @HouseAppropsGOP @AppropsDems 2/
Major review papers on saturated fats ignored by USDA.
#DelaytheDGA @HouseAgGOP @HouseAgDems @HouseAppropsGOP @AppropsDems
doi.org/10.1093/nutrit… 3/
Read 8 tweets
7 Jul 20
Today! 11-3PM ET, tweet to #DelaytheDGA until the expert panel includes ALL the science in the Dietary Guidelines expert report. Currently all trials on weight loss, low-carb excluded. Sat fat reviews of last 10y excluded. @HouseAgGOP @HouseAgDems @HouseAppropsGOP @AppropsDems 1/
DGA methodology is a black box. Lack of transparency , eg. not disclosing sig. conflicts of interest on expert panel, which include major ties to food and pharma industries. #DelaytheDGA @HouseAgGOP @HouseAgDems @HouseAppropsGOP @AppropsDems 2/
DGA has no advice for anyone diagnosed w/ chronic illness including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, fatty liver disease, etc. Even tho these are DIET-related diseases. Obesity now at 42.4% in US. #DelaytheDGA @HouseAgGOP @HouseAgDems @HouseAppropsGOP @AppropsDems 3/
Read 5 tweets
8 Jun 20
Obesity continues to rise in the US. 42.4% among adults now. There was a prediction that we'd hit 50% by 2030, but seems like we'll get there sooner. Not surprising given that nearly all trials on weight loss excluded from our #DietaryGuidelines 1/ cdc.gov/nchs/data/data…
Our nation's nutrition policy, affecting schools, military, feeding programs for elderly etc, is only for "healthy Americans"--USDA-HHS have decided. Even though Congress said the #dietaryguidelines should be for the "general public." 2/
General public is now >60% of America w/ 1 or more chronic disease. Yet Guidelines are not for them. The current committee has also excluded virtually all low-carb science and all science that contradicts continued caps on sat fats. No matter ur views, this is bad science... 3/
Read 4 tweets
25 Jan 20
For those who missed the #DietaryGuidelines Committee hearing this week. Top news:
--USDA still using its 'own' methodology-- unvalidated, unrecognized. Allows evidence grade to be "strong" based solely on epidemiological studies 😒
1/
Thus, committee gave "strong" evidence grade for existing, status-quo Guidelines (Med/DASH/plant-based) and all-cause mortality, based only on epi data (not enough evidence for other 'dietary patterns,' committee said)
--No other "Dietary Pattern" review is yet complete. 2/
--It appears "low-carb" still defined as 45%
--Saturated-fats review not yet done.
--No 'strong' evidence for anything else. Only "moderate" or less for other questions...thus, if this were a rigorous process, no recommendations would be made based on such weaker evidence... 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(