The city could encourage this by allowing developers to fully deduct package rooms from zoned floor area (great idea!). But without that, it drives up the cost of housing by forcing developers to use buildable land for package storage rather than housing @ReynosoBrooklyn
Allowing more FAR deductions (hallways!) would allow more housing while flying under NIMBYs’ radar. Nobody looks that closely at the zoning code...we could have larger and more livable apartments – and, for big sites, more of them – if hallways didn’t count as zoning floor area
There is precedent for this: one of the ways that the Japanese national government liberalized zoning in the 1990s was to exclude hallways, elevators, and other common areas from zoned floor area calculations researchgate.net/figure/Success…
The NYC Zoning Resolution already allows you to do this, but weakly – only half the floor area can be deducted, and certain conditions apply fontanarchitecture.com/quality-housin…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s amazing how America has some of the strictest fire rules in the world when it comes to construction, but then nobody from the city ever checks to make sure you’ve even got a smoke detector. Seems like possibly lower hanging fruit
When I was co-op board president we tried to inspect units once a year to make sure they were working (since, like most buildings in the city, it didn’t have sprinklers and god knows what was going on inside the walls with the wiring), but we couldn’t legally make tenants open up
In new buildings, you’ve got sprinklers and fire-rated double stairs and electrical that’s likely up to code and hardwired smoke alarms. And if you try to suggest that sprinklers or double stairs in masonry/steel buildings might be overkill, people act like you’re a monster
This struck me early on. But rather than accepting the premise than working for Phipps is a black mark, I'd reframe and say that the NYC left is so anti-housing that they can't even support the city's oldest nonprofit affordable housing developer
For example, the Sunnyside Gardens rejection. The local council member SAID he was opposed because of Phipps's reputation...but then once Phipps added parking and cut the density and he got on board, despite their reputation remaining unchanged. So what was it really about? 🤔
Then there's the worst evictors list. What is a non-profit supposed to do with tenants who don't pay the rent? It's not market rate housing – a tenant being evicted is all downside to them. They have no incentive to evict unfairly
We’re not in a great place if the sober middle ground is to say yes to the 3-story bldg where a 5-story bldg once stood, but no to a 7-story bldg unless the developer builds something expensive (glass addition to old structure, mass density in a small tower) in a low-income city
Philadelphia is a city with high construction costs and low rents. I’d love for American to reform its building codes and culture, but we are not at continental European levels of efficiency, and this is just not affordable in a place where new townhouses sell well under $300 psf
And my point as well. I’m coming at you with numbers; you’re coming at me with “see, YIMBY absolutist!”
The bottom of the New York area housing market: $625 SRO (microwave and mini-fridge, presumably shared bathroom) for rent in Patterson, NJ. No smokers. Work verification required. Craigslist ad in Spanish newjersey.craigslist.org/roo/d/paterson…
I mean, okay, it's not the literal bottom of the New York housing market. You can find a cheaper bunkbed or living room sectioned-off by a bedsheet. Or a room in a basement. But it's close to the cheapest accommodations you can rent with four walls and an above-grade window
Been reading this book (thanks, @nyc_ce). It argues that immigrant developers and architects, not upper-class housing reformers, were responsible for improvements in tenement housing in NYC and Boston in the late 19th/early 20th centuries. It’s very good amazon.com/Decorated-Tene…
Tenement kitchen improvements (stoves, running water, hot water heaters) were entirely market-driven, toilets (moving them inside, then within apartments) were a mix of market and regs, baths were the market (shunned by reformers, in fact!)
This book is so good...better than Plunz’s A History of Housing in NYC. Better story arc, not as encyclopedic. Really gets into the head of an immigrant tenant...you can imagine yourself upgrading to an apt with a private toilet, hot water heater & hall entrance for your boarder
The problem with these old European tourist-heavy cities is that they’ve stopped growing and created this zero-sum competition for space, where every space taken over by tourists crowds out a local. It doesn’t have to be like that though nytimes.com/2021/03/31/tra…
There is also some benefit to “destroying” spaces through overdevelopment. In a healthy city, neighborhoods should rise and fall...charming district destroyed by overbuilding, tourists move onto somewhere else, not-so-charming area is taken over by immigrants who don’t need charm
What’s the point of an ancient old city center anyway if no locals dare set foot there for fear of vomiting, screaming 25-year-old tourists? Who’s it really benefitting?