With Pablo Iglesias gone it feels a bit like the end of an era. For those in my generation who witnessed occupied squares of 2011 and then their electoral spinoffs (Corbyn, Syriza, Sanders, Podemos) it may seem like the usual boulevard of broken dreams. It ain't.
As Iglesias himself said in his resignation speech "we have changed Spanish politics and broken two-party rule". Podemos has made a wedge into the Spanish political system that is profound and structural.
Same thing for many other countries. Sanders and Corbyn came very close to snatching away a presidential nomination, and winning majority in Commons respectively. This was unthinkable before 2011.
Often surprised by how little long-term view we have. And how after defeats (which are part of the process) ppl easily get disheartened. Lula won at the *4th* attempt. Little bit more persistence, self-confidence, and what once upon a time they called discipline, would be great.
The purple wave was effective at 3 levels:
1) establishing new priorities in political discourse;
2) establishing organisation
3) perhaps most important of all: nurturing some sense of possibility after decades of self-doubt
The first one is obvious. Think about what political discourse was like 10 years ago (that is if you are old enough to remember). Inequality was not a thing people would discuss as today. Much less how beautiful public services are, or let alone social-democracy or socialism.
Biden is doing the good things is doing because of 1) fear of Trump comeback; 2) fear of China, but 3) also because discourse has changed and socialist-populists were instrumental to that.
In terms of organisation, in Spain, France, Italy (though 5 star is the odd one out), new parties have been established with 100,000s members. They are parties with flaws but they *exist*. Real parties - and orgs like Momentum or Justice Democrats, DSA - are not born every day.
I'd say the most important thing of all is that this signals people once again think organisations and parties are necessary. That's an important turn in common sense vis-a-vis late New Left cult of spontaneity and/or sectarian groupuscules.
Finally: possibility. Most important of all neoliberal dogmas was infamous There Is No Alternative, internalised by so many of us under high neoliberalism. 2010s shattered sense of stasis/impotence. But also taught ppl that trying to change things comes with a cost.
It will be very interesting to see how the seeds planted in the 2010s germinate in the 2020s. My money is on the fact that we will see on the one hand quite a bit of readjustment in the political mainstream (Bidenomics etc.) and on the other hand new populist revolts.
end
I realise I have an affective investment in this, so I may not be too sober. But perhaps the point is precisely that all this taught us there is no transformational politics without enormous affective investment and some suspension of disbelief.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paolo Gerbaudo

Paolo Gerbaudo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paologerbaudo

11 Apr
A must-listen interview with Brian Deese, director of Biden’s National Economic Council on Bidenomics. It highlights profound shift in discourse and policy. Here are some points: thread. nytimes.com/2021/04/09/opi…
Deese argues that the massive stimulus and other economic measures taken by Biden are not simply response to the pandemic. They aim at radically redirecting economic system in the long term.
He identifies two major threats: economic inequality and climate change. But his concern is also geopolitical. He fears US is in increasingly bad position vis-a-vis ascending China
Read 12 tweets
7 Apr
Since 2008 scholars have discussed various "variants" of neoliberalism in its zombie phase: authoritarian neoliberalism, punitive neoliberalism, etc. Yet, what we are now witnessing in the West is something quite different from neoliberalism. New concepts are urgently needed.
Neoliberalism's key tenets are all in question:
1) Monetarism: already gone with post-2008 QE
2) Fiscal Conservatism: largest deficits since World War II
3) Global Trade: Biden is almost as protectionist as Trump
4) Low taxation: ppl are discussing a minimum global corporate tax!
Very difficut to chart what comes next, as it is a very fast moving terrain, and hard to discern conjunctural from structural trends. But many signs point to a more statist model of capitalism than the one we have witnessed from late in 1980s to 2010s.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(