A few thoughts on Cru's recent, deeply troubling publication on CRT, specifically its portrayal of critical theory.
p.48
"I don’t think you have to know about Critical Theory
or Cultural Marxism to have the biblical discernment
that these teachings contradict Scripture." #CruToo
This quote 👆 encapsulates so much that is wrong with evangelicalism.
I have been teaching on critical language pedagogy & critical language theories since 2008.
I can't say strongly enough how grossly inaccurate, wildly misinformed & dangerously unbalanced this Cru document is.
The Cru document is heavily dependent on one online 2019 TGC article on critical theory.
Yet even this article notes that "Christians, in general, are woefully ill-equipped to accurately represent & critique critical theory because of relying too heavily on secondary sources."
That a global organisation of the size of Cru would so poorly represent the ways that numerous scholars (incl. Christians) have engaged responsibly w/ the diversity of critical theories in order to work toward a more just society is staggeringly irresponsible.
In my own scholarship trajectory, I've spent nearly 20 yrs considering/wrestling w/critical pedagogy & critical theories of language in order to understand how these theories do & do not apply to the ways that religious language & other discourses work.
When working on issues connected to violence, to harm, to injustice-
When speaking about social, cultural, economic, educational, religious, etc. forces, where the stakes are so high, that connect to matters of dignity, to flourishing, to justice ..
Elsewhere, according to another Cru alumnus, white people are like Polish villagers during Nazi occupation
"If one village killed a Nazi invader the entire village would pay. To punish all "whites" and make them pay reparations for the crimes of others is the same kind of logic"
Someone has given me a video of Cru US National Director Mark Gauthier responding to the recent anti-CRT report.
Rather than clearly condemning this highly inflammatory, racist document, Gauthier's key objection seems to be the fact that people found out about it. #CruToo
The way Gauthier frames his message is striking. After giving a note of personal thanks about prayers for his mother, he laments "the shooting that happened in Atlanta today where 8 people made in the image of God lost their lives. 6 women of Asian descent and 2 Caucasians."
"I also think about some of you that this kind of violence touches you in a very deep way. I want you to know that I'm praying for you, and I want to invite all of us to pray ..."
What matters here is what is *missing*.
No mention of the shooter nor Christian white supremacy.
Some of this responses to this post show us alot about how #religiouslanguage words.
We use religious language to evoke authority, tradition, mystery. It marks something as special (whether positively or negatively), set aside, sacred.
1/
2/ If Christians with recognised authority call something "Biblical" (Biblical manhood, Biblical counseling, Biblical patriarchy),
& if this is repeated often enough,
The sacred meaning attached to that concept (of manhood or whatever) becomes *very difficult* to question/detach
3/ If you question this concept that has been *branded* as Biblical,
You aren't just questioning the concept of manhood or counseling, etc.
You aren't just questioning the authority figures who designed that brand.
You are now questioning the Bible. You are questioning God.