Cheney is being ejected from the Republican Party because she continues to speak out against its anti-democratic wing.
Greenwald avoids talking about that when attacking those who praise her. Much easier to mock people's bios.
"Ha-ha, look this person who supports BLM and MeToo also praises politicians who don't vote to overturn elections" is perhaps just less of an own than GG thinks it s.
GG will talk about Cheney's past and all the reasons she is a terrible person. But thats not why she is being exiled from GOP party leadership though, is it? Or why some liberals are praising her? It's almost like some people want to downplay efforts to overturn US democracy.
Its really not that complicated. One party refusing to accept the outcome of the election is not a "trivial partisan concern" - it's a threat to democracy. It's actually good to have a system where people can set policy differences aside to agree on basic democratic protections.
There was a window after the Capitol insurrection when the GOP could have punished the anti-democratic elements of the party. But they kept Trump, and now those refute the Big Lie are being exiled because they are an awkward reminder of that choice. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
GG's whole shtick is that liberals are hypocrites. Fine. But by standard political science measures US democracy has gotten weaker, and the threat is not over yet (see @ThePlumLineGS).
Its not hypocrisy to prefer the pro-democratic wing of the GOP. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Laws banning speech have already been passed in some states, but we are finally starting to see a media recognition about how "critical race theory" is a carefully constructed moral panic theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
These laws serve multiple purposes: they are culture war fodder with a racial valence to distract from the GOP's threadbare economic policies. While obviously unconstitutional, they will still succeed in chilling speech by teachers/faculty who don't want to be pilloried on Fox.
Media, esp. local media & right wing media, have largely accepted the framing of CRT as a dangerous theory that must be stopped, rather than as an unconstitutional attack on free speech motivated by a desire to stop conversations about race and power.
When people complain about excessive wokeness on campus, the examples are often vague or poorly reported. This one is not. Students don't want to participate in a song that originated in a minstrel show, and alum want to compel them to do so.
*Student guides don't want to include a plaque featuring the song on campus tours
*Student band members don't want to play the song, so the university now has two bands!
*Student athletes don't want to be compelled into singing the song
UT did its own investigation into the history of song, and determined the song was not overtly racist. But obviously many students don't agree. washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/03…
Striking how a bunch of conservative activists have persuaded state politicians to ignore the judgment of educational professionals about what should be taught in the classroom. Statement from OK City Schools Superintendent opposing the law kfor.com/news/oklahoma-…
Signs of a successfully-created moral panic: "we can confirm that this vaguely defined thing is happening at some colleges"
Good morning to everyone except the very serious free speech warriors who are encouraging, or strategically ignoring, state censorship of discussions of race in the classroom tennessean.com/story/news/pol…
The term Orwellian is overused, but this is very straightforward doublespeak. Conservatives claim to be fighting state imposed speech but they are the ones passing laws that determine what can and cannot be taught in the classroom.
Those pushing the efforts to censor speech in the classroom are pretty upfront about their propaganda and you can see it disseminate in real-time. See Megyn Kelly concur with the new use of terminology "state sanctioned" and then uses it with her 2.5M followers.
The juxtaposition of the Democracy Dies in Darkness header and hosting the book tour of the guy who encouraged Capitol insurrectionists is too much.
The @washingtonpost then presents a fawning bio that Hawley's publicist presumably sent them ("a leading champion in Congress for working families") while skipping over the whole insurrectionist/voting to overturn the election thing. washingtonpost.com/washington-pos…
Hawley's twitter feed is full of complaints about how the media and tech giants are trying to censor him. And yet, the newspaper owned by Jeff Bezos is giving Hawley the most flattering platform to hawk his book.
The ongoing GOP opposition to democratic outcomes should be treated as what it is: a danger to democracy, a measure of party failure, an issue party leaders should be asked about anytime they are in public.
This local news station has taken a different approach, one that is actually supportive of democracy. They remind viewers which elected officials spread conspiracies or voted to overturn an election. This should be the model. washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/medi…
A President refused to accept the outcome of the election, has persuaded most in the party that this Big Lie is true, his supporters stormed the Capitol seeking to overturn it, and many party members voted against it. We normalize or forget these dangerous actions at our peril.