Lyn Alden Profile picture
May 6, 2021 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Broad money growth generally occurs in one of two ways: either banks lend and create deposits (and thus increase the money multiplier, M2/MB) or when bank lending seizes up, governments run large deficits and go around the bank lending channel.

A thread. Image
Looking at 140 years of data, we see periods where loan growth fueled broad money growth (late 1800s, 1920s, 1950s, etc), periods where fiscal deficits fueled broad money growth (1940s), and periods like the 1970s/1980s where both lending and deficits fueled broad money growth. Image
The 1940s are interesting because they are most analogous to the 2020s. After a large private debt bubble partial deleveraging (1930s and 2010s), a period of economic stagnation and external catalyst eventually resulted in a massive fiscal response (1940s and 2020s). Image
If we look at the money multiplier, M2/MB, along with fiscal deficits, we see further similarities between the 1930s/2010s (eras of rates hitting zero, monetary base expansion, private debt bubble peak), and 1940s/2020s (eras of fiscal dominance).
lynalden.com/fiscal-and-mon… Image
During the 1940s, inflation was transitory in rate-of-change terms, but after each spike in inflation, prices reached a new permanent plateau and went up from there. Cash and bondholders permanently lost purchasing power in three transitory/stepwise movements. ImageImage
Temporary supply shortages serve as catalysts for those rapid rate-of-change inflation spikes, but then prices remain structurally higher because more money is permanently in the system. It's not *just* the supply shortage, in other words.
When debt is high and the economy is sluggish, banks don’t lend much. The 1940s broad money growth, nominal GDP growth, and inflation were fueled almost entirely by fiscal deficit spending. It wasn’t until the late 1940s, after notable inflation, that bank lending kicked back in. Image
In other words, bank lending is not a prerequisite for either broad money growth or price inflation over a multi-year period.

Periods of fiscal dominance can override that usual relationship. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lyn Alden

Lyn Alden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LynAldenContact

Mar 6
I've got my fluctuating list of top-5 or top-10 of financial/macro interviewers, and there are many great ones out there.

But the unchanging #1 of that list for several years now has been @JackFarley96.

How do I rank this? By the % of their interviews I actually listen to.
🧵
I'm a case where I'm both a consumer of financial media, and an interviewee in financial media.

As a consumer, I want an interviewer to seek out great guests, research them thoroughly, and ask the right questions.

That's not always the most sensationalist viewcount stuff.
As a consumer, I also want to see pushback against popular guests. They do say the same thing a lot.

Interviewers struggle to get popular guests on their show. And so they tend to be nice, to get them again.

But the best shows involve some push and pull. Have the guts to push!
Read 6 tweets
Feb 22
Here's a thread about social media decentralization.

A couple years ago, I tried to "like" one of Doomberg's posts about a platform, and I literally saw the heart fill up, and then drain out of it like blood. I'd never seen that before.

Twitter said me liking that was disabled: Image
Then, when I tried to search on Twitter for that certain platform that apparently can't be named, the search results would replace it with "newsletter" in my search of the network, which was kind of Orwellian: Image
Even now, I don't say the obvious visible name of that platform that starts with an S. Since an unconscious algo might derank it.

Maybe that's not an issue anymore. Probably.

The funny thing is that I didn't even post about that platform until I couldn't. Then I did a lot.
Read 24 tweets
Feb 22
I think disagreement is the engine of change. Good ideas win or lose on their merits.

It might be short-form memes or long-form articles and books. But you need to be able to win your arguments that way.

Force is the *last* resort, usually in defense from irrationality.

But.🧵
Maybe I’m old-fashioned.

I was always taught in martial arts to be polite until hit, but then to rekt whoever hit me or those I am responsible for.

I think that’s pretty fair. It is a very high hurdle before your ideas can hurt me or my family enough for me to hit back.
My father was more hardcore, though.

He actually told me to hit bullies *first*.

He had a hard life and won, and I disagreed with his views early on.

I thought that was too rough. Too mean. My mother said otherwise. My conscience said otherwise.

But he was adamant on this.
Read 15 tweets
Jan 5
A lot of individual facts that the bears were saying in 2023 and 2024 were correct, but those facts were dwarfed by fiscal dominance. Image
For example, net bank loan creation was sluggish at just $300B over the past year.

But banks also bought $400B net in Treasuries. Image
Healthcare spending, DoD spending, Social Security spending, and interest expense just kept rolling. Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 13, 2024
I keep seeing the chart float around of 23 million government employees, as though that's directly cuttable by the new Department of Government Efficiency.

Keep in mind that 3 million of those are listed as federal and the other 20+ million are state/local.

A thread. 🧵 Image
Image
Now, quantifying the actual federal workforce is actually nontrivial.
-Are we talking civilian, or military too (1.3M)?
-Are we including postal workers (550k)?

This WH report says 4.3 million federal workers with all of this, with breakdowns.
whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
But wait, there's more. There are also somewhere in the ballpark of 4 million federal contractors. The number fluctuates.

In 2023, $759 billion was committed to them.
gao.gov/blog/snapshot-…
Read 6 tweets
Nov 7, 2024
Along with Steve Lee @moneyball and Ren @0xren_cf, I co-authored a paper that analyzes the process and risks of how Bitcoin upgrades its consensus rules over time, from a technical & economic perspective.

Here's a 🧵

You can check it out here:
github.com/bitcoin-cap/bc…
Here's the v1.0 PDF version:
github.com/bitcoin-cap/bc…
Bitcoin is hard to change by design, and the methods of how it changes have evolved as the network has grown.

In the paper, we analyze what consensus is, and how different types of entities have different incentives and powers during the course of a potential consensus change.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(