Broad money growth generally occurs in one of two ways: either banks lend and create deposits (and thus increase the money multiplier, M2/MB) or when bank lending seizes up, governments run large deficits and go around the bank lending channel.
A thread.
Looking at 140 years of data, we see periods where loan growth fueled broad money growth (late 1800s, 1920s, 1950s, etc), periods where fiscal deficits fueled broad money growth (1940s), and periods like the 1970s/1980s where both lending and deficits fueled broad money growth.
The 1940s are interesting because they are most analogous to the 2020s. After a large private debt bubble partial deleveraging (1930s and 2010s), a period of economic stagnation and external catalyst eventually resulted in a massive fiscal response (1940s and 2020s).
If we look at the money multiplier, M2/MB, along with fiscal deficits, we see further similarities between the 1930s/2010s (eras of rates hitting zero, monetary base expansion, private debt bubble peak), and 1940s/2020s (eras of fiscal dominance). lynalden.com/fiscal-and-mon…
During the 1940s, inflation was transitory in rate-of-change terms, but after each spike in inflation, prices reached a new permanent plateau and went up from there. Cash and bondholders permanently lost purchasing power in three transitory/stepwise movements.
Temporary supply shortages serve as catalysts for those rapid rate-of-change inflation spikes, but then prices remain structurally higher because more money is permanently in the system. It's not *just* the supply shortage, in other words.
When debt is high and the economy is sluggish, banks don’t lend much. The 1940s broad money growth, nominal GDP growth, and inflation were fueled almost entirely by fiscal deficit spending. It wasn’t until the late 1940s, after notable inflation, that bank lending kicked back in.
In other words, bank lending is not a prerequisite for either broad money growth or price inflation over a multi-year period.
Periods of fiscal dominance can override that usual relationship.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I keep seeing the chart float around of 23 million government employees, as though that's directly cuttable by the new Department of Government Efficiency.
Keep in mind that 3 million of those are listed as federal and the other 20+ million are state/local.
A thread. 🧵
Now, quantifying the actual federal workforce is actually nontrivial.
-Are we talking civilian, or military too (1.3M)?
-Are we including postal workers (550k)?
Along with Steve Lee @moneyball and Ren @0xren_cf, I co-authored a paper that analyzes the process and risks of how Bitcoin upgrades its consensus rules over time, from a technical & economic perspective.
Bitcoin is hard to change by design, and the methods of how it changes have evolved as the network has grown.
In the paper, we analyze what consensus is, and how different types of entities have different incentives and powers during the course of a potential consensus change.
CPI for November came in this morning. Headline numbers continue to bounce around above 3%, while core continues to gradually decrease. 🧵
Some people assume that the end of inflation means prices go down, but instead it just means the rate of change of prices decreases to the target rate.
There's permanently more money in the system, and prices in aggregate are permanently higher.
Currently, China has weak domestic consumption but strong production/exports, the United States has decent consumption but weak production, and Europe's domestic consumption *and* production are weak.
This weakness weighs on energy prices and other materials.
Since the start of 2020, the United States has taken on $10.7 trillion in new public debt (i.e. accumulated deficits).
That's about $80k per household in four years.
Has your household received that much in deficit spending? Some did, but likely not yours.
Some households received hundreds of thousands or even millions in stimulus.
And a sizable chunk of them were wealthy law firm or investment firm owners, or and various rather large business owners (100s of employees) that were not even disrupted by the pandemic/lockdowns.
Some households received indirect deficit expenditure. For example, if your employer received it, it may have positively affected your job.
But most analysis (e.g. see above tweet) showed that most of the money didn't go to that. It instead pooled near the top.
-The Golden Monarch
-Lord "Uncle" Sam
-The Dragon Emperor
-Archmage Nakamoto
🧵
The Golden Monarch economically defeated all opposition and reigned supreme for thousands of years. Now ancient and wise, and having seen the entirety of history, he contemplates his diminishing role in the modern world and wonders if he could have done anything differently.
Lord Sam, usurper of gold, known merely as “the Uncle” to many, sits at the Cantillon Source and wields the mighty dollar. Liberating in his youth, now oppressive in his age. His monetary power reigns supreme but shows increasing signs of decadence, decay, and defiance.
Often I see people assume that with full-reserve banking, there would be no credit.
But full-reserve banking just means that loans are funded by time deposits rather than demand deposits. In other words, there is duration-matching between assets and liabilities. 🧵
In that arrangement, bank customers that need to be able to access their money on demand, get full-reserve liquidity.
Customers that want to earn a yield with risk can put some money into time deposits, which the bank can use to make loans of similar duration or less.
With fractional-reserve banking (which all countries do today), there is a duration mismatch which can lead to liquidity problems.
Demand depositors are told they can withdraw at any time in banking hours, and yet most of their money is loaned out in illiquid loans/securities.