Lyn Alden Profile picture
May 6, 2021 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Broad money growth generally occurs in one of two ways: either banks lend and create deposits (and thus increase the money multiplier, M2/MB) or when bank lending seizes up, governments run large deficits and go around the bank lending channel.

A thread. Image
Looking at 140 years of data, we see periods where loan growth fueled broad money growth (late 1800s, 1920s, 1950s, etc), periods where fiscal deficits fueled broad money growth (1940s), and periods like the 1970s/1980s where both lending and deficits fueled broad money growth. Image
The 1940s are interesting because they are most analogous to the 2020s. After a large private debt bubble partial deleveraging (1930s and 2010s), a period of economic stagnation and external catalyst eventually resulted in a massive fiscal response (1940s and 2020s). Image
If we look at the money multiplier, M2/MB, along with fiscal deficits, we see further similarities between the 1930s/2010s (eras of rates hitting zero, monetary base expansion, private debt bubble peak), and 1940s/2020s (eras of fiscal dominance).
lynalden.com/fiscal-and-mon… Image
During the 1940s, inflation was transitory in rate-of-change terms, but after each spike in inflation, prices reached a new permanent plateau and went up from there. Cash and bondholders permanently lost purchasing power in three transitory/stepwise movements. ImageImage
Temporary supply shortages serve as catalysts for those rapid rate-of-change inflation spikes, but then prices remain structurally higher because more money is permanently in the system. It's not *just* the supply shortage, in other words.
When debt is high and the economy is sluggish, banks don’t lend much. The 1940s broad money growth, nominal GDP growth, and inflation were fueled almost entirely by fiscal deficit spending. It wasn’t until the late 1940s, after notable inflation, that bank lending kicked back in. Image
In other words, bank lending is not a prerequisite for either broad money growth or price inflation over a multi-year period.

Periods of fiscal dominance can override that usual relationship. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lyn Alden

Lyn Alden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LynAldenContact

Dec 12, 2023
CPI for November came in this morning. Headline numbers continue to bounce around above 3%, while core continues to gradually decrease. 🧵
Image
Image
Some people assume that the end of inflation means prices go down, but instead it just means the rate of change of prices decreases to the target rate.

There's permanently more money in the system, and prices in aggregate are permanently higher. Image
Currently, China has weak domestic consumption but strong production/exports, the United States has decent consumption but weak production, and Europe's domestic consumption *and* production are weak.

This weakness weighs on energy prices and other materials.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 9, 2023
Since the start of 2020, the United States has taken on $10.7 trillion in new public debt (i.e. accumulated deficits).

That's about $80k per household in four years.

Has your household received that much in deficit spending? Some did, but likely not yours. Image
Some households received hundreds of thousands or even millions in stimulus.

And a sizable chunk of them were wealthy law firm or investment firm owners, or and various rather large business owners (100s of employees) that were not even disrupted by the pandemic/lockdowns. Image
Some households received indirect deficit expenditure. For example, if your employer received it, it may have positively affected your job.

But most analysis (e.g. see above tweet) showed that most of the money didn't go to that. It instead pooled near the top.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 7, 2023
Four monies, personified:

-The Golden Monarch
-Lord "Uncle" Sam
-The Dragon Emperor
-Archmage Nakamoto
🧵 Image
The Golden Monarch economically defeated all opposition and reigned supreme for thousands of years. Now ancient and wise, and having seen the entirety of history, he contemplates his diminishing role in the modern world and wonders if he could have done anything differently. Image
Lord Sam, usurper of gold, known merely as “the Uncle” to many, sits at the Cantillon Source and wields the mighty dollar. Liberating in his youth, now oppressive in his age. His monetary power reigns supreme but shows increasing signs of decadence, decay, and defiance. Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 6, 2023
Often I see people assume that with full-reserve banking, there would be no credit.

But full-reserve banking just means that loans are funded by time deposits rather than demand deposits. In other words, there is duration-matching between assets and liabilities. 🧵
In that arrangement, bank customers that need to be able to access their money on demand, get full-reserve liquidity.

Customers that want to earn a yield with risk can put some money into time deposits, which the bank can use to make loans of similar duration or less.
With fractional-reserve banking (which all countries do today), there is a duration mismatch which can lead to liquidity problems.

Demand depositors are told they can withdraw at any time in banking hours, and yet most of their money is loaned out in illiquid loans/securities.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 24, 2023
The #Bitcoin side of my feed has tremendous comment liquidity- I write something about it and get an *immediate* response by the hundreds or more.

Bear/Bull- I haven't seen this in years. It's different than sentiment; it's volume. Comment numbers, broadly.

Here's a thread. 🧵
Yes, I'm structurally bullish.

No, I don't know what it will do in the next six months.

Yes, institutions increasingly understand this more than you do. If you've not followed this in detail, you're going to follow eventually.

Chart via @PositiveCrypto Image
Bitcoin is the leading digital money. As information began coalescing online, eventually value did too, but it took longer.

The internet browser was created in 1994. Bitcoin was launched in 2009.

Bitcoin is half as old as the browser now, and it keeps growing in adoption.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 22, 2023
The fact that Satoshi:

1) published the Bitcoin white paper before he launched it,
2) kept it on track for 2 years with upgrades,
3) disappeared without ever spending his own coins for profit, and
4) had such skill that people can't prove his identity,

is... remarkable.
Literally the Batman vs Bruce Wayne comparison is the only good one here.

Even if Satoshi is the NSA, people should have evidenced it by now.

A man can be killed, embarrassed, or shown to be weak.

An idea lives on and becomes a legend or a god. It's his material that matters.
And Bitcoin was built as an open source decentralized project to survive regardless of who the creator was.

The departure and the absence of the creator only made it *more* decentralized since it removed any sort of ultimate authority, and it iterated from there.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(