Why Journalists Have Little Credibility When They Quote 'Science!'
What the enclosed paragraphs say about SARS-CoV-2 virus can be said about many other areas of modern research, including Climate Change.
Was SARS-Cov-2 Created in the Wuhan Lab?
At this point there are serious doubts about 'natural emergence' of SARS-Cov-2 virus. Natural emergence seems like a fiction created and promulgated strenuously by China and virologists affiliated with China funded research.
This is why scientists are not always the best judge of societal risks of their work. Work on genetic mutations needs to be guided by a higher level of wisdom than seems to be at work at some of the labs around the world.
Read this for clear clues for what seems likely to have happened in Wuhan Virology Lab.
How do we know what Dr. Shi was working on. We know because she got a research grant, from none other than Dr. Fauci, to work precisely on this.
The lab escape scenario for the origin of the SARS2 virus, as should by now be evident, is not mere hand-waving in the direction of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It is a detailed proposal, based on the specific project being funded there by Dr. Fauci.
Even if the grant required the work plan described above, how can we be sure that the plan was carried out? For that we can rely on the word of Dr. Daszak, who has been protesting loudly for 15 months that lab escape was a ludicrous conspiracy theory. Conflict of interest?
On 9/12/2019, before coronavirus outbreak became known, Dr. Daszak gave an interview in which he talked glowingly of how researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been reprogramming the spike protein and generating coronaviruses capable of infecting humanized mice.
For an example of how money corrupts scientists look no further than Dr. Daszak.
Imprudent Risks
Another reason why scientists take imprudent risks.
Oh. My. Loving. God!
Our government knew more than it has let on till now.
The US Role in Funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology
The director of the NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins, have a lot of explaining to do, as they funded this research despite a law against doing so.
Maybe Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins know more than they can share, for reasons of national security, but their judgment can be questioned regardless, considering the worldwide toll taken by a virus that could have resulted from the research they funded.
If indeed SARS2 was generated in a lab, here are the players who seem most likely to deserve blame for unleashing this pandemic, in order of culpability. 1. Chinese virologists 2. Chinese authorities 3. The worldwide community of virologists 4. Possibly Dr. Fauci & Dr. Collins
This conclusion seems on point.
Here's an explanation for why there is so little media and Congressional curiosity about the origins of this devastating virus.
And this.
Origin of Covid -- Following The Clues
The best and most thorough article on the origins of SARS-Cov-2 you are likely to read. The above excerpts are all from this article. I am most grateful to Nicholas Wade for writing this. Respect!🙏
Pay heed folks. The below tweet is from a patriot who I believe served our blessed nation in uniform with honor. Now I am going to say something I would never have thought I would say even a few days ago. It's a stream of consciousness thread. Bear with me.
2. Back in early 2016 and for years prior to that, I detested Donald Trump as a rich blowhard who had no relevance to my life. So I ignored him almost entirely. I have never watched a single episode of any of his TV programs and his other exploits were a source of irritation.
3. I only started paying attention to Trump in the second half of 2016 when he became the Republican nominee for president. I had serious reservations about him. But once he got elected, I was compelled to take him seriously. So I reflected diligently on Trump presidency to come.
What do you think the result of the below mentioned survey would be if the question was changed
from:
"Do you think companies should publicly support..."
to:
"Do you think companies should publicly profit from..."? nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-ne…
2. Where public company actions are concerned, there is not a dime's worth of difference between "supporting" and "profiting from." No public company deliberately and willfully takes any action that might hurt their profits.
3. We as a society should of course treat gays with exactly the same respect and dignity and rights and everything else that is accorded to straights. We are all equal.
1. Message for Anyone Bothered By SVB Customers Being Made Whole
Stop with the nonsense. You either don't understand or are scratching a rash you got from somewhere else. It doesn't matter who SVB customers are or what they do. No depositor is ever responsible for a bank failure.
2. Bank failures are always the fault of the bank management and the regulators. And as for the "due diligence," it is fair to expect the bank investors and shareholders to do that and take a bath when they get it wrong. It's not fair to expect bank customers to do that.
3. Expecting depositors to do due diligence on the bank where they deposit their money is like asking every customer who uses electricity to graduate in Electrical Engineering before flipping a power switch to turn on the lights in their home. It is stupid blather.
1. How to Solve a Problem Like SVB
Having delineated in the enclosed thread how we got here, this thread addresses where we go from here. The SVB problem by itself is not that hard to solve, but it is possible politicians (of both parties) will plunge the nation into crisis.
2. First and foremost, let me dispense with the buzz on Twitter created by @elonmusk with his enclosed tweet. This ain't gonna happen. So please stop wasting time reading myriads of columns that have sprung up from this font. Musk is just having fun.
3. JP Morgan Chase would be a natural buyer but government screwed Jamie Dimon badly in 2008 after he came through and bought Washington Mutual at government’s urging. WaMu was the largest bank failure in U.S. history, SVB being the second largest.
There was plenty of mismanagement at SVB, but first and foremost I want to reassure my followers (maybe the events that unfold next week will make a liar out of me, so take everything I say as unauthoritative stream of consciousness).
2. The main thrust of this thread is to point out why the SVB blowout is nothing like the root cause of 2008 financial crisis, and people shouldn't jump to those kind of fears or conclusions. This is very different. Things like this have happened before but ~50 years ago, not 15.
3. 2008 financial crisis was brought on by banks making too many bad loans that were prone to risk of default. SVB was brought down by not making enough loans, but investing the deposited funds heavily in safe bonds which were nonetheless exposed to interest rate risk.