On the remote-work controversy, I can't help but think that people who do actual work are more likely to enjoy remote work, where it's easier to concentrate, & managers, whose work is meetings, want to return to physical offices, where meetings aren't so obviously useless/dreary.
Still useless, just not as dreary!
One thing discussions around this topic always reveal is that I'm an extreme outlier. My appetite for solitude, and solitary work, is basically bottomless. This need or appetite people have for workaday interactions with co-workers ... I just don't have it. At all.
To be clear, I'm not *averse* to those interactions. I have liked & enjoyed many co-workers over the years & still count many as friends! Being social is fun for all the normal human reasons! I've just never found it important for my work, much less necessary.
All I've ever wanted, from the time I was a little tot, is to go off by myself, do my thing, & then turn it in. I never understood collaboration, never wanted it, was always terrible at it. Same for instruction & guidance. No thanks. Just leave me alone to do my thing.
As you can imagine I was a nightmare employee and might as well have been built in a lab for Substack. At last, pure solitude, all work, no meetings!
Didn't intend to make this thread eternal, but I just remembered another way to describe a difference in the way people work. Some people have extremely high intellectual/social metabolism. They jump into a task, get fried quickly, need a different task, need novelty & change ...
... just flit from thing to think & need regular/frequent input to stay energized. They are like ... supercapacitors. Capable of rapid absorption, rapid discharge, but not much *depth* of charge. They run out quickly. On the other hand ...
... there are people like me, more like a giant flywheel. If I try to flit about from thing to thing, I get *nothing* done. I need deep concentration, and it takes a long time & a lot of steady input/concentration to get me in that productive state. But ...
... once I'm going, once the flywheel is spinning, I can go *forever*. If freed from distractions & breaks & interruptions, I can sit alone at my computer, in deep concentration, for hours & hours & hours & hours.
As you can imagine, for someone like me, working in an office just means constant breaks & interruptions, which means I can never really get the flywheel spinning, which means I get nothing done. This is why 98% of my actual writing work, for years, has been done at night.
Gimme those five hours from 8pm to 1am. Fewer emails, fewer tweets, fewer interruptions, just me slowly spinning up the wheel until it is running full speed, and letting it hum along in that state for hours on end. I can be SO productive then. But only then, really.
Anyway, I don't know if "flywheel" is a category in, like, management literature or whatever, but is should be. Flywheels work better at home.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

8 May
The skills necessary to be a good press secretary are so utterly, diametrically opposed to mine that I view it as a kind of dark magic. I just love watching Psaki work.
Be polite and indulgent when you're disgusted.

Say a thing without actually saying it.

Answer a question without actually answering it.

Burn someone to the ground while smiling & saying nice words.

Refuse distractions and repeat a small set of core messages.

It's all magic.
Read 4 tweets
7 May
It's not that difficult. They're belligerent, xenophobic reactionaries who sole pursuit is political power & imposing suffering on outsiders & Others. But the whole US center-left/VSP apparatus has ruled that explanation out, so what's left is a mystery. washingtonpost.com/politics/biden…
It goes like this: if you say Republicans are in fact the terrible people they appear to be, you're "partisan." And it is deep, deep in the DNA of VSPs that they are not on any team -- they are above that, with refined sensibilities that appreciate both sides' perspectives. So...
... they can't say that. But then they're left with this endless puzzle, which is explaining endless ugly, ignorant, cruel behavior ... without attributing it to ugliness, ignorance, or cruelty. This is like the main intellectual job of VSPs: laundering that behavior.
Read 8 tweets
6 May
We're going to need lots of minerals. (Chart by @axios.) iea.org/reports/the-ro…
Oil & gas will try to draw a false equivalence between the need for minerals & the need for fossil fuels, but there's a key difference. If you want more oil & gas, your only choice is to explore further, dig deeper, do more violence to 🌎. The minerals challenge is different ...
... in that minerals are not the ends, just the means. We can innovate around them. We can reduce the need, find benign substitutions, improve mining standards, figure out recycling at scale, etc. Oil & gas is a 20thC resource problem; minerals is more a 21stC innovation problem.
Read 5 tweets
28 Apr
All right: A THREAD. A long thread.

I had a thought I wanted to add to this piece, but it was a bit of a wonky diversion, so I left it out. I will instead tackle it here on Twitter, the ideal venue for complicated wonky diversions. 🤪 volts.wtf/p/america-is-m…
There's a concept in economics (from recently deceased Canadian economist Robert Mundell) of an "optimum currency area" (OCA). His idea was that common currencies should go beyond national borders to regions that share certain features. investopedia.com/terms/o/optimu…
The euro is the baby of this idea, though later some people (I think Krugman among them?) criticized it by saying that, in fact, countries like Germany & Greece are not similar enough, & do not share strong enough central gov't, for the euro to work well.
Read 20 tweets
27 Apr
Like all the right's demonstrable lies, this will lead to ... nothing. None of the people who told it will apologize or feel any regret. None of the people who believed it will feel like suckers. No reporter will apply additional skepticism the next time. washingtonpost.com/politics/biden…
The only thing you need to know about the future course of the GOP is that it is operating in a context in which lying is all upside, no downside. It's like playing the lottery, but the tickets are free -- possible jackpot, zero cost. Why wouldn't they keep doing it?
Here's a challenge. Of all the lies the right has told in the 21st C -- about Iraq, terrorism, climate change, the economy, Obama, Hillary, voting, etc. etc. -- name one that has harmed them in any way. Legally, electorally, financially, reputationally, anything. Name one.
Read 6 tweets
27 Apr
My new post: to get back in the Paris climate agreement, Biden pledged to reduce US national emissions 50% by 2030.

That’s ... fine. It’s a nice bit of symbolism. Enjoy the warm feeling. But remember: it’s policy that matters. Policy, policy, policy. vox.com/22401917/biden…
Policy, policy, policy.
Relevant to my earlier Carville tweet.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(