Capitalism is a misanthropic, dystopian ideology. Its proponents always talk about "human nature" as greedy and selfish, which is complete bullshit that only feels true to a greedy, selfish person. But it's also a self-fulfilling prophecy that creates the world it describes.
Because capitalism cultists believe human nature is greedy and selfish, they cannot imagine any solutions to our world's problems that aren't driven by greed and selfishness. That's why they're holding out hope that we'll all be saved by greedy, selfish parasites like Elon Musk.
Someone who's always projecting their own greed and selfishness onto everyone else will scoff and dismiss the idea that we can transcend our self-destructive patterning and move into a collaborative relationship with each other and with our ecosystem. They see it as impossible.
So now here we are, with the dominant narratives of our age driving us into extinction via self-fulfilling prophecy. Which is why it's so important to do whatever we can to seize control of the narrative.
It does NOT have to be this way. Human nature is NOT what they say it is.
Bullshit. Absolute bullshit. I look inside myself and I do not find greed and selfishness, I find kindness, compassion, and an eagerness to collaborate. So you're not telling me about human nature, you're telling me about your own nature.
It's the way that term is now used. I've got nothing to do with Stalinism; I'm not even a Marxist. My opposition to imperialist agendas against Russia and China have nothing to do with communism whatsoever. Yet I get called a tankie every day.
This is how propaganda occurs in the west. It's not that Jeff Bezos emails WaPo employees saying "Promote US wars!", it's that only reporters who protect imperialism see their careers rise. "If you believed something else, you wouldn't be sitting here."
This is why you see blue-checkmarked reporters tweeting in service of imperialist narratives and smearing leftists and anti-imperialists. They're not (usually) being paid to tweet that stuff; they're promoting their career by signalling that they'll protect the establishment.
[ Today's Caitlin Johnstone article has been replaced with a breaking news report from the National News Conglomerate. NNC: Obey. ]
JERUSALEM -- A four-month old Palestinian infant has sustained fist-related injuries to the face on Saturday during a violent clash with Israeli police officers.
People believe we can just snip humans out of their ecosystemic context to colonize space for the same reason they believe in rugged individualism: they don't grasp how inseparably interconnected each human is. With our ecosystem, and with our society. Separation is an illusion.
We are not separable from our ecosystem. We ARE our ecosystem. We're so inseparably one with our ecosystem that, as Alan Watts once said, we need to send astronauts into space with a little box of it or else they will die. Space colonization will never happen.
People assume space colonization is part of our future primarily because science fiction takes this as a given. But science fiction is fiction, written to entertain and appeal to the same ego which imagines it is separate from the rest of the world. It's an illusory premise.
Every positive change in human behavior, individually or collectively, has been preceded by an increase in awareness. Anything you can do toward this end makes a difference, whether it's spreading awareness through a conversation, a tweet, or street graffiti. Your efforts matter.
One doesn't end an addiction or self-destructive behavior until they become conscious of the inner dynamics feeding into it. Societal illnesses don't end until people become conscious of how wrong they are. Dysfunction and consciousness can't coexist. Your efforts matter.
All that is wrong with our world is the result of human unconsciousness. All that is good in our world is the result of an expansion of consciousness. Anything you can do to help make even a tiny part of humanity a tiny bit more conscious of the truth makes the world better.
"It’s not surprising that Australians might look with horror on such a conflict. There’s no way for anyone to 'win' a war between America and China. A conventional clash could easily end up going nuclear, with the US still reserving its right to first use of these weapons"
Sometimes I think the Yanks would better understand why I write about their government's escalations against China if they lived a little closer to the front line.
"If China chose to retaliate to such an attack without directly attacking the American mainland, hitting a US ally like Australia would be an option."