Apparently @kaitlancollins seems to forget the media was leaked a classified top-secret FISA application on March 17, 2017. Yes, there was a full blown *secret* FBI investigation into who SSCI Security Director James Wolfe was leaking to. DUH!
2. The latest article, written (not accidentally) by Devlin Barrett, opens the door for us to remind everyone what exactly was happening at the time.
3. Before getting to the nub of it... a reminder:
4. March 17th Wolfe leaked FISA to Ali Watkins. A few weeks later Watkins starts writing about the FISA (without saying she had it). Immediately after Watkins @DevlinBarrett and company join in.
5. Which leads to the biggest MEDIA FRAUD in the past few decades.
All the outlets (Buzzfeed, Politico, WaPo, NYT) had the actual FISA application in their hands. Yet they specifically wrote lies about the Trump campaign being under Obama admin surveillance.
6. Unbeknownst to FBI HQ, WasFieldOffice FBI Special Agent Brian Dugan was tasked with following the Wolfe leak of the FISA.
Dugan conducted physical surveillance on Wolfe, identified the reporters, went to a court and got a warrant. That's how solid the evidence he had was.
7. Agent Dugan set up a sting operation. Followed the reporting of the leak, and collected evidence about which reporters gained custody of the FISA application.
Mid-December 2017 Wolfe finally admitted to the leak.
8. Agent Dugan finished his investigative file and turned it over to DC U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu.
However, by early 2018 Robert Mueller (per Rosenstein) held all investigative authority over everything Trump/Russia. Liu couldn't prosecute Wolfe without first informing Mueller
9. In/around early February 2018 agent Brian Dugan's file of evidence against Wolfe was then given to the special counsel team for review and return to Liu.
This was the first time Mueller/Weissmann found out about the FBI FISA leak investigation.
10. By that time Weissmann and Mueller (oblivious idiot) were knee deep in using the special counsel for the cover-up operation to protect the DOJ and FBI officials who did the illegal surveillance.
11. The Weissmann crew freaked out. The Dugan file would undermine the validity of their own investigation. The special counsel obtained downstream warrants as an outcome of a fraudulent FISA application.
They needed to throw a bag over Dugan's file.
12. What the special counsel did with Dugan's file was pretty astonishing.
First they informed Senator Mark Warner that his communications were also intercepted by Dugan.
Dugan used the backdoor to Warner by getting the text messages of Adam Waldman.
13. Dugan followed the Wolfe trail (and interviewed him) and in that trail he found Mark Warner who likely (almost certainly) told Wolfe to leak the FISA application.
[Warner wanted a special counsel in March 2017. The leak and narrative supported it.]
14. So Weissmann gave Warner a head's up.
And then the special counsel took the text message evidence out of the Dugan file and distributed it (FEB 2018).
Warner was provided time to cook up his story about why he was in contact with Chris Steele.
15. The next thing Weissmann did was inform the media who received the leak(s) that an FBI investigation led to a search warrant authorizing their phones to be reviewed.
The special counsel needed to now make sure the leaked FISA was the only one what ever was public.
16. After informing the media about the content of Dugan's leak investigation file.....
17. The special counsel then had to release the *exact same version* of the FISA that was leaked.
The version Weissmann released (under the auspices of FOIA) was the version that was inside Dugan's file.
That's why the dates were redacted.
18. To this day, few people realize the copy of the FISA that was made public by the special counsel (7/21/18) contains the Dugan file copy.
The March 17, 2017, FISA stamp is the day the copy was given to Dugan... who gave it to Wolfe... who leaked it.
19. So yeah, all the journalists who Wolfe contacted were also caught up in the investigation by FBI Washington Field Office Agent Brian Dugan.
THAT includes:
20. Any Questions?
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. The results from the FBI search warrants, was the predicate material for the J6 team to begin targeting Trump supporters in the aftermath of the 2020 election.
3. Those Arctic Frost search warrants included banking records, networks, affiliations, communications, Google search results, social media platform user IDs and much more.
2) It was in June 2022, when Senator Chuck Grassley sent a letter to then Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Chris Wray, notifying them of whistleblower allegations from within the FBI that senior leadership in both Main Justice and FBI are involved in a coordinated effort to cover up criminal activity related to Hunter Biden.
3) The whistleblower allegations, in combination with the documented history of DOJ and FBI misconduct, culminate in Senator Grassley stating:
...“If these allegations are true and accurate, the Justice Department and FBI are – and have been – institutionally corrupted to their very core to the point in which the United States Congress and the American people will have no confidence in the equal application of the law. Attorney General Garland and Director Wray, simply put, based on the allegations that I’ve received from numerous whistleblowers, you have systemic and existential problems within your agencies.”
Grassley was admitting what has been visible for years.
2) The reality is actually something entirely different.
The people in control of FBI field operations (not Kash), set up their agency head by informing the boss a suspect was in custody.
The ever concerned and focused on public opinion, Kash Patel, then took to Twitter to relay the news.
We all watched it unfold.
3) An embarrassed Patel then was forced to retract his public statement, walking back his message that a suspect was in custody.
The FBI field operatives smiled. Egg applied as expected, it worked brilliantly.
Patel couldn't then turn to those who set him up with anger, because their defense was, "we were questioning a suspect, we didn't tell you to go public with it - and as it turned out the suspect was cleared."
It was a brilliant maneuver, intended to undermine his authority and position and it worked perfectly.
Did you see his face when he eventually did arrive in Utah and didn't say a word at the microphone?
On Friday November 18th, 2016, The Washington Post reported on a recommendation in “October” that Mike Rogers be removed from his NSA position:
..."The heads of the Pentagon and the nation’s intelligence community have recommended to President Obama that the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael S. Rogers, be removed.
The recommendation, delivered to the White House last month, was made by Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., according to several U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
[…] In a move apparently unprecedented for a military officer, Rogers, without notifying superiors, traveled to New York to meet with Trump on Thursday at Trump Tower. That caused consternation at senior levels of the administration, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters."...
In February and March 2017 HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes, a gang of eight member, reviewed intelligence reports that were assembled exclusively for the office of the former President (Obama). That is why he went to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) Information Facility to review.
After Devin Nunes review the information March 22nd, 2017, Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, then held a brief press conference and stated he had been provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources that include ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.
Quotes from the presser:
1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”
2.) “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”
3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”
4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.
“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”
•“Who was aware of it?” •“Why was it not disclosed to congress?” •“Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?” •“Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?” •“And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”
“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th [2017] letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”
Back in 2017 when House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes was working to reauthorize the FISA legislation, Nunes wrote a letter to ODNI Dan Coats about this specific issue:
There is little doubt the NSA database was used by Obama-era officials, from 2012 through April 2016, as a way to spy on their political opposition. Quite simply there is no other intellectually honest explanation for the scale and volume of database abuse that was taking place.
When we reconcile what was taking place and who was involved, then the actions of the exact same principal participants take on a jaw-dropping amount of clarity.
All of the action taken by CIA Director Brennan, FBI Director Comey, ODNI Clapper and Defense Secretary Ashton Carter make sense. Including their effort to get NSA Director Mike Rogers fired.
Russia-Gate, the Steele Dossier and even the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (drawn from the dossier and signed by the above) were needed to create a cover-story and protect themselves from discovery of this four-year weaponization, political surveillance and unlawful spying.
This is why President Obama was willing to push the Russiagate story with his activity in December of 2016 after the election. Obama wasn’t only dirtying up President Trump, Obama was using Russiagate as a cover for the spying that took place using the NSA database.
Even the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel makes sense; Mueller was FBI Director when the use of the NSA database surveillance began. Aaron Zebly was his chief-of-staff.
The beginning decision to use FISA (702) as a domestic surveillance and political spy mechanism appears to have started in/around 2012. Perhaps sometime shortly before the 2012 presidential election and before John Brennan left the White House and moved to CIA. However, there was an earlier version of data assembly that preceded this effort.
Political spying 1.0 was actually the weaponization of the IRS.
This is where the term “Secret Research Project” originated as a description from the Obama team. It involved the U.S. Department of Justice under Eric Holder and the FBI under Robert Mueller. It never made sense why Eric Holder requested over 1 million tax records via CD ROM, until overlaying the timeline of the FISA abuse:
The IRS sent the FBI “21 disks constituting a 1.1-million-page database of information from 501(c)(4) tax exempt organizations to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” The transaction occurred in October 2010
1. Former National Security Advisor John Bolton is a well-documented neocon, who operates inside the business model of selling U.S. foreign policy influence for personal gain. His activity mirrors that of former Senator John McCain in many regards.
John Bolton sold his access, contacts and ability to influence policy to the highest bidder. In DC parlance they call that a “consultant.” When the consulting is contracted for a specific foreign national interest, the title shifts to “lobbyist.” That was his job, and all of Washington DC knows it.
Washington DC operates on this business model; the entire system will be soft to criticize Bolton, and many will likely defend him.
2. The FBI raid on his residence and office has led to a considerable amount of speculation. However, as some background details start to come out, it appears CIA Director John Ratcliffe provided FBI Director Kash Patel with specifics on the international travels and efforts of Bolton.
That CIA referral has led to an FBI investigation under the auspices of potential violations of the espionage act, where Bolton would have leveraged current or prior classified intelligence information as part of his influence business.
Almost identically to former Senator John McCain, John Bolton was well known to intersect with the nation of Qatar as part of his operation. Qatar has deep pockets and a long-identified influence operation throughout the middle east and the United States, sometimes playing all sides.
Qatar is also the playground for the CIA.
While it is yet unknown which nation and which activity Bolton was likely engaged in, the highest probability centers around the deepest pockets, which would also put Bolton on the CIA radar.
3. "The information that provided the basis for the warrant to search John Bolton’s home on Friday was based on intelligence collected overseas by the C.I.A., according to people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing criminal investigation.
John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, provided Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, with limited access to the intelligence. It involved the mishandling of classified material by Mr. Bolton, the people said.
The search of the home and office of Mr. Bolton, who was national security adviser during President Trump’s first term, was a major escalation of a long-running inquiry into whether he collected or leaked sensitive national security information, law enforcement officials said.
The nature of the intelligence collected overseas is not known. The F.B.I. obtained the search warrant after presenting evidence to a federal judge. Mr. Bolton’s office declined to comment.
The C.I.A. and F.B.I. regularly cooperate on counterterrorism investigations. It is unusual for the C.I.A. to so prominently provide information for a high-profile investigation of a former U.S. official."...